Viewpoint: Should we send humans to Mars?

Mars exploration

Related Stories

In the second instalment of his two-part feature on human missions to Mars, Dr Alexander Kumar - who has been overwintering at Concordia Station, Antarctica - asks whether we should send people to the Red Planet given our poor record managing this one. Read the first part here.

Much like the interior of Antarctica, Mars remains inhospitable.

For humans to live on the planet for any significant period of time would require the recycling of water and air, along with other so-called "life systems".

At Concordia station in Antarctica (my current home) we use "grey water recycling" - taking the water generated from domestic activities such as laundry, bathing and dishwashing and recycling it on-site for other uses. This mirrors the system used on the International Space Station (ISS).

But there are even grander ideas that could further extend the duration of human habitation on Mars.

Whether or not we find Martian life, there is a long-standing wish to "terraform" the Red Planet. This would involve artificially transforming the climate and surface to enable humans to live there without life support systems.

In his Mars Trilogy, science fiction author Kim Stanley Robinson documents the process of inhabitation and colonisation, causing a chain of events that turn the Red Planet into a green one and later a blue world.

A human presence on Mars will inevitably change the environment. It was HG Wells who first identified the possibility of humans unknowingly "spoiling" other distant planets through bio-contamination - bringing their bacteria and other potential microbial colonists with them.

I believe the lessons we have learnt in the past century through polar - and in particular Antarctic -exploration and science are very relevant. Our delicate polar regions are continually threatened by climate change and so often used to forecast and track the state of our planet.

Mr Robinson maintains that when it comes to investigating the challenges of sending a manned mission to Mars "Antarctica is the best analogue, not the Wild West or anything else".

Contaminating Mars

John Ash from the Scott Polar Research Institute commented: "Forward contamination is a critical factor in space exploration, and much may be learned by the work being done in connection with the penetration of Antarctica's hidden ice lakes. Of course, it is critical not to contaminate samples that may offer scientific proof of extraterrestrial life; but there are also legal obligations."

He is referring to the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies.

Ray Bradbury In Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles, humans take refuge on Mars

Alongside the potential for "forward" contamination, our own contamination of the new, previously undisturbed environments we visit, there is the potential of "backward" contamination also.

There are many other ideas - methods employed by past polar explorers using a depot system to cross Antarctica's empty, hostile and unknown interior, could be adapted to a manned mission to Mars, where a series of supply depots could be laid in orbit between Earth and Mars, accompanied by sending reserve supplies equipment into Mars' orbit or to a planned landing site on its surface.

Like the polar expeditions led by Amundsen, Scott and Shackleton, this would add a factor of safety, reassurance and ability to resupply and makes repairs en-route, for the brave crew travelling into the unknown.

Over the coming decades, there could be another call for astronauts, this time for a manned mission to Mars. Similar to Ernest Shackleton's fabled newspaper advertisement, with Nasa's recent budgetary cuts, recruitment for an interplanetary mission's crew might also spell out: "Men and women wanted for hazardous journey, small wages, bitter cold and long months of complete darkness."

The late science fiction writer Ray Bradbury left us with an echoic and stern warning in his story The Martian Chronicles where the colonisation of Mars becomes a necessity for human survival - with humans fleeing a troubled, broken and atomically devastated home planet Earth.

If our species follows its current course, a biblical apocalypse could be a potential outcome.

Extinction event

In describing the possibility of standing on the surface of Mars himself, Tim Peake tells me: "It would be the most exhilarating feeling imaginable."

He adds: "At some point, hopefully many, many years in the future, the Earth will suffer an event that human life cannot tolerate - that is to say, an extinction event.

"If mankind is to survive as a species then in the long term our future existence lies in colonisation of other planets or moons. I believe this is something that can be achieved, but it will require many years of progressive steps before we are capable of colonisation.

Concordia Research at remote outposts such as Concordia may yield lessons for future missions to Mars

"We live on a fragile planet in a highly dynamic Universe, so manned exploration of space is not just about our quest for knowledge but also an insurance policy for the future."

Many sceptics will undoubtedly question why any country would choose to invest in future space exploration, including a manned mission to Mars, while there are so many unsolved problems on our planet, from HIV to malaria to poverty.

They would be absolutely correct. Trust me, I'm a doctor who has travelled far and wide, and have witnessed the worst effects of poverty, disease and war.

The last words of Captain Robert Falcon Scott, addressed to the public in his diary, echo loudly: "For God's sake look after our people."

Sitting in Antarctica 100 years on, dreaming of Mars, I would update Scott's advice by factoring into his equation, the impact (unbeknown to him) of humans on Earth over the past century.

I would reiterate: "For God's sake, look after our people…. and also our planet."

Caring is sharing

Should we be so frivolous by our excessive nature, and be trusted to visit, contaminate and perhaps colonise another planet when we seem so incapable of conserving and looking after our own home world?

Maybe this continuing lack of care for the planet and its people will one day become the reason we leave Earth for once and for all.

However, alongside my experiences as a doctor, I also travel the world as a scientific explorer.

On a large lonely wooden cross on top of a hill in Antarctica, overlooking a route taken to the South Pole, someone inscribed the words "to strive, to seek, to find and not to yield".

These words, borrowed from Sir Alfred Tennyson's Ulysses poem, had been left by the party who located Scott's tent in memory of the expedition team's legacy.

Among them, my own hero, the doctor Edward Wilson, whose dreams did not become a graveyard leave a blazing trail and legacy of science to inspire future generations.

Only by pushing mankind to its limits, to the bottoms of the ocean and into space, will we make discoveries in science and technology that can be adapted to improve life on Earth.

If the origin of life as we know it arose from a Big Bang in a distant area of the Universe, perhaps the solutions we seek to our problems on Earth may also lie there.

Failing to strive, seek or find would be an even greater tragedy - and represent a giant leap backwards for mankind.

You can follow Doctor Alexander Kumar's current experiences in Antarctica at his website.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 89.

    Having read a few of the comments I am pleasatly surprised to see so few comments from self loathing humans.

    It is a moral imperative to colonise worlds just as it was to leave the stone age cave. To discover new lands and to return useful knowledge to those who insist on staying behind.

  • rate this

    Comment number 88.

    Sir Richard Branson recently said: "In my lifetime, I'm determined to being a part of starting a population on Mars. I think it is absolutely realistic. It will happen."

  • rate this

    Comment number 87.

    I will just leave this here.

    Sagans' Scaling Heaven - On Human spaceflight.

  • rate this

    Comment number 86.

    This planet is a paradise that should be nutured. It is a sign of immaturity and sickness to abuse our 'Mother' earth. To set up an alternative base is a great idea, but not because we have trashed this one.

  • rate this

    Comment number 85.

    I volunteer the Con-Dems for the mission, we'll miss them but they will be leading the way.

  • rate this

    Comment number 84.

    Yes. I suggest Cameron, Milliband, Clegg and Bercow. Ed Ball and his missus can go on the same space ship as Lord Prescott, Denis Skinner and Harriet Harman, they will enjoy each other's company. On the last spaceship perhaps some of our entertainers should go to keep the politicos joyful. Jo Brand comes to mind along with Bill Odie, Russell Brand and the new winner of X Factor.

  • rate this

    Comment number 83.

    For those that missed it, the first instalment of this story is at

  • rate this

    Comment number 82.

    Mankind will be extinct in 100-200 years time ... right now businesses are under incredible pressure to create new franken-foods, GMO, new dangerous technologies and rush them to the shop in 3 years or less.

    Our technology is powerful now, but our irresponsibility and risk-taking the same ...

    And there is only one result of this situation- extinction.

    Can mankind wake up ?

    Can you wake up ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 81.

    Maybe I am alone but the masochistic ramblings of people who think humanity is evil and we should slowly fade into extinction does my head in. We must do everything in our power to ensure the survival of our species, and one day that will mean colonising another planet (probably not Mars). Hopefully the colonists will be the brightest human minds, rather than the Mayflower puritan sort.

  • rate this

    Comment number 80.

    Yes great! lets force those that can afford a one way ticket to Mars and make sure they never return to earth again what a better earth we will have after they leave lol

  • rate this

    Comment number 79.

    @35 john byng.

    just out of curiosity, how big do you think the earth is?. the earth is around 8,000 miles in diameter (7,926 miles). and you have the audacity to question someone's education?.perhaps it is you that needs to check facts first.

  • rate this

    Comment number 78.

    the biggest problem with Mars is sending people there is easy but expensive. There will be no profits to be had until we start terraforming and populating the planet but that will take a long time. Even if we started now it would not be achieved for many generations and whilst future generations will be very grateful we did start todays generations would not benefit and so would be less grateful.

  • rate this

    Comment number 77.

    I wonder how property rights would be decided? In the great march across the frontiers of America your property was pretty much where you decided to settle. Will the corporations have already carved up the land? If so what incentive would there be for any settler to stay? You'd just be a unique type of tenant.

  • rate this

    Comment number 76.

    There is one fundamental rule to life, things want to live and fill every nook and cranny available to ensure future survival. We humans are no different in this respect. Why do we live, procreate and adapt to our environment if not to ensure the survival of our species? At some point we will outgrow our host planet and the only option will be find another host. Life as they say will go on...

  • rate this

    Comment number 75.

    The argument ALWAYS is 'we have problems on earth we need to solve before we can go'. Scary news flash. They won't go away - not ever, no matter the treasure we pour down the maw of poverty, or the blood, sweat, and tears we spend in curing disease. There will always be poverty, always disease, always waste, want, war, and human stupidity. That's not a reason - it's an excuse.

  • rate this

    Comment number 74.

    The thought that the human race might survive for billions of years and colonize other planets is just too horrible to contemplate. I'm sure that we will discover a way to wipe ourselves out long before we achieve viable space travel.

  • rate this

    Comment number 73.

    We will send people to Mars and we will teraform the planet so that the air is breathable, there is both flora and fauna, rivers lakes and seas. The only real drwback is Mars will become a massive retirement planet. You will spend your young years on Earth and when ready retire to Mars. The reason being the gravity on Mars is much less and so much less strain on old bones easier retirement

  • rate this

    Comment number 72.

    Yes we should send humans to Mars. It is an alien world strewn with boulders but many discoveries await those that go there. The cost would run into billions but perhaps it could be a joint venture with all nations taking part in their own way and the project would help unite mankind and bring a sense of pride and achievement to all.

  • Comment number 71.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 70.

    Absolutely...starting with Nick Clegg, Andrew Mitchell, the Milliblands.........


Page 16 of 20


More Science & Environment stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.