Fortress security for GM wheat trial

 

Past two barriers of security, a mile inside the Rothamsted Research centre, I was taken to see what must be the most closely guarded field in the United Kingdom.

With groups of police and security guards dotting the lanes throughout this centre, a relatively small plot of land lies behind high steel fencing.

This is where genetically modified wheat is being grown, part of an experiment to see if the plants can repel a common pest, aphids, without having to resort to insecticide.

One of a small group of journalists, I was allowed through the fencing into the plot itself - this is crop science conducted inside a fortress.

Under a blazing sun, the earth was baked dry, and the GM wheat, a pale green, twitched and fluttered in the breeze.

The wheat is being cultivated in small squares, surrounded by other plants which will be checked to see if they are contaminated by the wheat.

The plants themselves look unremarkable and it was a strange sensation making the visit under such stringent conditions.

Walkie-talkies crackled, a police helicopter hovered overhead and acres of day-glo clothing were apparent on the guards monitoring the perimeter.

The initiative to take journalists inside the trial site is part of a major PR offensive by the scientists and their backers to be open and transparent about the research - in an effort to explain its value to the public.

The director of the centre, Professor Maurice Moloney, has been giving endless interviews this morning to describe the work.

His appeal is simple: let us do the experiment to see if this technique makes sense.

For the community of plant scientists, and its supporters in government and the wider world of science, this is a vital test of strength.

The planned protest by anti-GM campaigners, Take the Flour Back, is gathering at the edge of the centre.

Their argument is that the risks of conducting GM trials in the open are too great and that the site should be "decontaminated".

No one can be sure how this will play out. I'm off to see the protestors now.

 
David Shukman Article written by David Shukman David Shukman Science editor

How could man intervene to change the climate?

The field of geo-engineering - where humans intervene to change the climate - throws up fascinating ideas, and nightmare scenarios.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 206.

    ''They say crops could contaminate the surrounding area. Site owner Rothamsted Research says that is highly unlikely.''
    +++
    They said it was ''highly unlikely'' that the Titanic would sink.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 205.

    @202 'Arcid'
    ~~
    Finally! What a relief to see a post from you that acknowledges the danger of specific GM intervention on plants/crops.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 204.

    200. Drunken Hobo said:
    "... Now you're just talking nonsense ... I find it so disheartening that people are so wilfully ignorant when the facts can be so easily found if they only took the effort to find them."

    Maybe you didn't understand my point - I couldn't make it any simpler.

    I must admit I don't know the guy's name, I'm sorry about that. But what else do you need to know?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 203.

    @199.Matthew
    @198.David Agnew
    It just seems a little too coincidental

    your logic is the same as
    Iran has been developing nuclear weapons since roughly the time GM crops were grown therefore GM crops caused Iran to start developing nuclear weapons

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 202.

    #171 Most GM would involve implanting genes to cause the plants to manufacture specific proteins. The interaction of these proteins plus the ones that are already in the plant could form a compound that could cause allergic reactions. the trouble with these is that they would be horribly specific, and at this point our understanding about how thy interact would be down to trial and error

 

Comments 5 of 206

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.