Water proves a prize asset

 
Lake Turkana at sunset

On first acquaintance, it's hard to see Ikal Angelei as a rebel.

Too young, too mild-mannered (perfect English diction), too much at ease in T-shirt and trousers.

It's a salutary lesson in never judging the book by the cover; because this young Kenyan woman is leading a protest movement that could yet block one of East Africa's most significant infrastructure projects.

The campaign has netted Ms Angelei one of this year's Goldman Prizes, one of the highest annual honours for grassroots environmental activists.

Not that there are too many grass roots in the Turkana region of Kenya, on the border with Ethiopia, South Sudan and Uganda. Rains have been infrequent as far back as communal memory stretches and have become even scarcer in recent years.

The region's prized water resource is Lake Turkana.

It's one of those unusual "endorheic" lakes that has no outflow; water that flows in, and is not used directly, either evaporates or percolates down into aquifers, which in turn provide water for those pastoralists who keep their herds some way distant from the lake itself.

Now, the Ethiopian government is building a major dam, GIBE-3, on the Lower Omo river just over the border. The Omo currently provides about 80% of Lake Turkana's water.

Graphic of GIBE-3 GIBE-3 would be one of the biggest dams in the world, dwarfing its neighbours

Nearly 240m high, the dam would generate 1,870MW at full flow. It would become the biggest dam in Africa, and the fourth-largest in the world.

Prime Minister Meles Zenawi says it must be built "at any cost" to help Ethiopia electrify and develop, and to power the irrigation schemes and plantations he wants to establish along the Omo valley.

Ikal Angelei Ikal Angelei: "When I started this campaign, my own family thought I was crazy"

The Kenyan government, which is likely to buy some of the electricity, also supports the scheme.

But Ikal Angelei fears the dam could dry the lifeblood for hundreds of thousands of people in the river valley and around Lake Turkana - lowering the water level by many metres, increasing the already high salinity, and preventing the drainage into aquifers that keeps cattle alive kilometres away.

"Communities that have been benefiting from the flow and the pasture will all have to move to where water is available - you're creating pressure for conflict in an area that already has a high potential for conflict because of scarce resources," she tells me.

"You do anything to change the current balance, you really exacerbate conflict in the region."

The recently increased aridity, combined with population growth, has already brought conflict, some of it across borders.

In 2006, when parts of Turkana had already gone three years without rain and three million Kenyans were on daily food aid, I visited the region briefly.

A local governor told me of pastoralists crossing the border with Uganda in search of somewhere to water their animals, exchanging fire with Ugandan air force planes; hardly a recipe for stability between neighbours.

Last year saw conflict between the Kenyan Turkana people and the Ethiopian Merille.

Flooding effect of dam on Omo River

At present With dam

Ms Angelei does not downplay the development benefits that GIBE-3's electricity could bring, though she does dispute Ethiopian government claims that its impact on Lake Turkana will be negligible.

What she's asking for first is to have the issues discussed thoroughly and openly, with all factors on the table.

The Ethiopian government awarded contracts for building GIBE-3 without tendering - and when this was pointed out to potential funders including the World Bank, European Investment Bank and African Development Bank, they withdrew.

Kenyan law has been another battleground.

She explains that the government is obliged to consider the needs of local people when considering such projects; and as the dam's first Environmental Impact Assessment didn't even mention Lake Turkana and was kept unpublished for years, she argues the government has broken its own law. A case is currently in the courts.

Turkana is among the "cradles of humanity", where our species lived and evolved; so the area has World Heritage interest as well.

Perhaps the most important aspect of the campaign she's mounted with her group Friends of Lake Turkana (FoLT) consists of talking to the communities that make up a variegated and neglected social landscape with a literacy rate barely above 10%.

In 2008, she found, hardly anyone she talked to had heard of GIBE-3 even though it was already underway; many did not even know what a dam was. So much for community engagement and informed consent.

A year later, chiefs and tribal elders signed a declaration authorising FoLT to tackle the Kenyan government on their behalf.

She argues that the governments are looking at the potential economic benefits of the project without understanding its economic costs.

No-one has yet studied the net worth of the fish Lake Turkana produces, the benefits of the cattle pasture - and the costs that society will have to bear if those things disappear.

And there are questions too of whether hydroelectric schemes are the best way to power a region that regularly sees droughts and may in future see them even more frequently as a consequence of man-made climate change.

"Turkana Boy" skull The region's rich anthropology has led scientists such as Richard Leakey to blast the dam

In 2003, 2008 and 2009 Ethiopia saw regular power cuts because of droughts affecting its existing hydro dams, including GIBE-1 and GIBE-2, which also sit on the Omo river.

"Our prime minister said two years ago that we cannot afford to depend on hydro - but now we're going to buy hydroelectricity from Ethiopia, which is even drier than Kenya," she says.

There's a certain irony in noting that just as Ethiopia is encouraging plantations along the Omo basin of cotton, one of the thirstiest crops and not exactly necessary for food, farmers in Australia's drought-hit Murray-Darling basin are being pressured to give it up.

Success is not assured for Ikal Angelei's campaign.

But even if it fails, it will have created a more informed local society, brought governments closer to the position of having to observe their own environmental laws, and made it more difficult to finance projects with dubious credentials.

This year's other Goldman Prizewinners are:

Evgenia Chirikova Evgenia Chirikova's Khimki Forest protesters have been arrested and beaten for their opposition
  • Caroline Cannon, for campaigning on behalf of her Inupiat people in Alaska to keep the Arctic waters pristine in the face of oil and gas exploitation
  • Evgenia Chirikova, campaigning for the re-routing of a planned road that would bisect Khimki Forest, Moscow's "green lungs"
  • Edwin Gariguez, a priest on Mindoro in the Philippines, who is leading opposition to a nickel mine that he believes will damage nature and the island's indigenous people
  • Sofia Gatica, an Argentinian whose child died from pesticide poisoning and who now organises local women (the "Mothers of Ituzaingo") to oppose indiscriminate use of toxic agrochemicals
  • Ma Jun, who created an online database showing Chinese citizens which factories are violating environmental regulations.

Each wins $150,000 for his/her campaign, as well as having the chance to raise the profile of the issues on which they work.

In doing so, each has the chance to follow in the footsteps of the late Kenyan campaigner Wangari Maathai, who won the Goldman Prize in 1991 en route to entering parliament, becoming environment minister and the first environmental Nobel Peace laureate.

"Wangari's fight made us believe that the efforts of one person can go a long way," says Ikal Angelei.

"For me, when I started this campaign in 2008 it was a one-person fight, most people didn't understand what I was doing, my own family thought I was crazy.

"But seeing the impact it's had, the legacy - it's leaving behind a situation where communities are actually believing 'you know what, we can fight for ourselves' - that has been a great inspiration."

 
Richard Black, Environment correspondent Article written by Richard Black Richard Black Former environment correspondent

Farewell and thanks for reading

This is my last entry for this page - I'm leaving the BBC to work, initially, on ocean conservation issues.

Read full article

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 1.

    Dams are extremely useful to us for they help to control floods and supply water to dams and cities. Dams also generate hydroelectric power, and the water stored in the lake is useful for irrigation of crops. The lake that forms behind the dam can be useful for water sports and leisure activities. Often, large dams become tourist attractions of their own sight.& can't understand how they are wrong

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 2.

    1.mccain
    True I agree with everything you have said, but it's a slightly onesided view. The lake prior to the dam will provide water and irrigation for the area, but deprive areas after of the valuable water resource. The main issue with dams is ecological damage, loss of habitat for wildlife, displacement of people. One of East Africa's resources is it's wildlife. Benefit must outway the damage.

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 3.

    i find it deeply uncomfortable about campaigning on behalf of illiterate people who 'dont know what dam is'. How about educating them and letting them make up their own mind? What is more important, allowing Ethiopia to develop and modernise or keeping a few quaint herding tribes alive so western eco-tourists can go on human safari

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 4.

    If you read more about the issue FoLT are educating local communities about what the dam is/what the consequences of it being built are. As to your claims that only a few "quaint herding tribes" will be kept alive; over 800,000 people live in the region and rely on the portion of the lake that may be affected by this dam. This kind of local initiative should be applauded not called into question.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 5.

    it is one sided story. my firend wrote that....Somethings are difficult to understand...those who are destroying the environment for real are not even close to list...when would the world get fair? Always good to check the two sides of the story...

 

Comments 5 of 59

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.