UN climate talks 'approaching decision time'

 
Chris Huhne speaking at Cop17 meeting Mr Huhne's comments were a call to arms for nations that had so far been "reluctant to join in"

Related Stories

The UK Climate Change Secretary says UN climate talks are at a crunch point.

On the final morning of talks in Durban, Chris Huhne said countries must decide whether they want a treaty that can really curb global warming.

The EU has made an ad-hoc alliance with some of the world's poorest nations to push for a strong deal here.

Ministerial talks overnight made little concrete progress, with big-emitting countries sticking out for a new deal that would take effect only after 2020.

That is too late for the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis), who both say talks must begin in January and conclude at the end of next year.

No big new treaty is going to be agreed at this meeting. What the LDCs, Aosis and the EU are seeking is a firm timetable - a mandate - leading to a new treaty.

In informal overnight discussions, ministers from the powerful BASIC group - Brazil, South Africa, India and China - held the line that talks should not begin before 2015, and should only take effect when current pledges on reducing emissions expire in 2020, sources said.

However, sources also indicate that India's Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan did not attend the overnight talks.

"We're reaching the point at which a number of delegations have got to decide whether they want to get a treaty with real environmental integrity or not," said Mr Huhne.

"There's now a very visible high-ambition coalition that stretches across the developed world, in Europe, and the developing countries, and the real issue is whether those that have been reluctant to join in with high ambition are prepared to do so."

Game of halves

On Thursday, Brazil's Environment Minister Izabella Teixiera told BBC News she was flexible on some elements of the proposed mandate.

The US - which has been widely accused of blocking tactics - also said it supported the EU concept of a "roadmap", but gave few extra details.

Aosis ministers had already questioned the validity of that statement - and in somewhat acerbic mood, Mr Huhne commented: "One of the key things is to look in detail about what people are prepared to do on the page as opposed to what they're prepared to say to the television cameras."

There has been little word from inside the Chinese or Indian camps as to how they currently see the negotiations.

Connie Hedegaard, the EU Climate Commissioner, suggested that of the four BASIC countries, Brazil and South Africa were showing much more flexibility than the Indians or Chinese.

Climate change glossary
Select a term to learn more:
Adaptation
Action that helps cope with the effects of climate change - for example construction of barriers to protect against rising sea levels, or conversion to crops capable of surviving high temperatures and drought.

"We have the half the BASIC group - we are now waiting for the other half," she said.

In what may be a reflection of that, campaigners have even developed a new acronym for the three-nation bloc they believe now stands in the way of a strong agreement - USIC.

Tosi Mpanu Mpanu, speaking for the African Group, said he believed ordinary Americans were not "the problem" - instead, it was "special interests", he said.

"I don't know how many Congressmen have a passport, I don't know if they travel to Africa - maybe if they travel to Africa they wil understand what this climate change phenomenon is all about," he said.

"If they only travel from Washington to Colorado, of course they're not in touch with what happens abroad."

Mr Mpanu Mpanu elaborated slightly on his earlier statements that the talks were seeing "chequebook diplomacy".

"Some people are telling us 'we don't want the Kyoto Protocol to continue, we want to get out, and look at all the money we are putting on the table for fast-start [finance]'."

But he declined to name names.

Alden Meyer from the Union of Concerned Scientists described the EU/LDCs/Aosis as "a significant development" of the type that led to endorsement of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997.

"We have never seen progress in these negotiations unless there is a progressive coalition of leaders from developed and developing countries who want action," he said.

The remaining obstacles in the negotiations are serious, but several observers described the mood as constructive.

Few are willing to bet on an outcome, apart from on the point that talks will continue long into Saturday morning.

Follow Richard on Twitter

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 79.

    If going green means increased cost, I must be doing something wrong. New car, low CO2, zero cost for road fund license and more mpg. Installed biomass heating, running costs reduced by one third over gas. Buy electricity from a 100% renewable source, unit cost is more, but I cut down my usage by 30%. I don't live in a cave, am warm and still reduced by CO2 footprint by 60%+. Some conspiracy.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 77.

    For the record, I'm with those who believe climate change is exacerbated by humans. Even if it ISN'T happening, it's still a good idea to re-use, recycle, reduce waste and use resources more wisely.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 53.

    We will soon have the planet we deserve. an arid ruin devoid of life.

    We are a species of selfish, greedy, parasitical apes.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 52.

    It will be the scientists, not the greens who will save us, in reality, cold showers, in the dark, and no cars/flights is going to be impossible to force on the developed world, let alone will developing countries swallow that they are going to be denied these aspirations. Start loving your scientists, start paying them more!

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 21.

    Attentions are focused on a financial crisis while climate change, a far greater threat is almost forgotten. Sadly very little if anything will be done until the inevitable glacial melt, a consequence of global warming from human activity altering atmospheric gas composition, begins to raise sea levels.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • Lake Chapala in Mexico (Pic: Joel Espinosa/Flickr)Crossing borders

    Illegal migration between Mexico and the US is not all one way

Programmes

  • The deep water submarineFast Track Watch

    Pushing the limits of tourism - how much would you pay for a real voyage to the bottom of sea?

bbc.co.uk navigation

BBC © 2012 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.