A green shoot in the economic mire
South Korea is investing $85bn in green growth
I know; it's terrible everywhere.
Economic gloom from Brest to Brastagi. The US so deeply in debt that it's hard to see President Obama's nose poking over the edge of the pile of IOUs.
Smog-bound in Beijing, parched in East Africa, drenched in Bangkok, isotope-laden in Japan. Energy prices rising, natural disasters increasing; and the western world too bound up in debt to do much about it.
If you like your analogies cinematic, this is our version of the bleak landscape confronting the Pixar robot Wall-e as he zips around on his fruitless, endless, pointless tidying-up mission.
If you've seen the movie, you'll know that eventually the fate of Wall-e and indeed the entire remaining human race is transformed by the discovery of a single green shoot.
An analogy for our times?
There are of course myriad analyses out there of the current economic and environmental crises.
And much promoted as something that can solve both in one fell swoop is "green growth".
Han Seung-soo is spearheading South Korea's green growth
In a quote that encapsulated the issue as neatly as I've seen it done, UK climate minister Greg Barker said last year: "What's holding the climate talks back is one question, and it's the same question whether you're a senator in Illinois or an MP in India or any European country.
"Fundamentally, it is whether a transition to a low-carbon economy is compatible with continued economic growth; and no-one knows the answer, because no country has made the transition yet."
If anyone's going to show whether the transition can be made succesfully, it's likely to be South Korea.
When the Fannie May/Freddie Mac/Lehman Brothers chapter of the economic crisis struck, many countries announced economic stimulus packages.
In environmental circles, South Korea was widely applauded for directing $85bn of its package towards "green growth" initiatives.
It also founded a Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) headed by former prime minister Han Seung-soo to research and develop approaches.
This is not an academic exercise.
In partnership with other countries, using expertise from anyone who wants to contribute, the GGGI aims to develop real strategies that can be used on the ground to change the economic paradigm - and with it, humanity's environmental prospects.
At the UN climate convention meeting here, I caught up with Dr Han and asked him to talk me through South Korea's reasoning, what "green growth" means in different countries, and what the prospects are for agreeing something meaningful on it at the Rio+20 summit next year.
Though the UN is firmly behind green growth, it's clearly a work in progress, as you'll hear.
I'd intended to write quite a bit more about green growth for this post; but as I type away in the BBC's booth in the converted car park that is our home for the conference, events here appear to be hotting up.
So that's it from me. The rest of the words are Dr Han's - which is good, as he knows far more about it than I do.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~05~RS~)




Karzai to boycott Taliban talks
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Patchy record
On the move in Mumbai
Fast Track
Comment number 1.
Cariboo8th December 2011 - 19:05
Richard says "US so deeply in deb".
Well (yawn) the numbers are certainly big but as a percent of GDP much less than the UK with it's debt load of 400% of GDP.
If the US can not afford it then just how is it that the UK can? There is no spare cash to pay for this foolishness so the money would have to be borrowed further encumbering the populace with ever more taxes.
Link to this (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
MangoChutney8th December 2011 - 19:29
Richard
Is it true that BBC pension funds rely on "Green Growth" to allow staff to have a wealthy retirement and is it a conflict of interest to promote "Green Growth" when staff pensions are ever more reliant on getting the Green message across?
It's a rhetorical question of course, because we all know BBC pension funds invest heavily in Green everything to the tune of £8b, I understand
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
Jack Hughes8th December 2011 - 19:42
"Green Jobs" is just the "broken windows" fallacy taken out of the fridge and warmed-up again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
MrSkipp8th December 2011 - 19:44
I think you are confusing green growth with the green economy. Green growth is an OECD initiative. It is about growth, and not about the environment. But it is the green economy which is on the agenda at Rio+20, and there is plenty of documentation there making the difference clear
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
Jack Hughes8th December 2011 - 19:52
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comments 5 of 37