Tests show fastest way to board passenger planes

 
Interior of a passenger plane The current most common boarding method clogs the aisles and rows

Related Stories

The most common way of boarding passenger planes is among the least efficient, tests have shown.

The best method has been the subject of study for years but now various approaches have been put to the test.

Boarding those in window seats first followed by middle and aisle seats results in a 40% gain in efficiency.

However, an approach called the Steffen method, alternating rows in the window-middle-aisle strategy, nearly doubles boarding speed.

The approach is named after Jason Steffen, an astrophysicist at Fermi National Laboratory in Illinois, US. Dr Steffen first considered the thorny problem of plane boarding in 2008, when he found himself in a long boarding queue.

He carried out a number of computer simulations to determine a better method than the typical "rear of the plane forwards" approach, publishing the results in the Journal of Air Transport Management.

Several authors had already proposed an order in which those seated in window seats boarded first, followed by middle seats and then aisle seats - dubbed the Wilma method. But Dr Steffen's best results suggested a variant of this.

He suggested boarding in alternate rows, window seats first, progressing from the rear forward: seats 12A, for example, followed by 10A, 8A and so on, then returning for 9A, 7A, 5A and so on, and then filling the middle and aisle seats in the same way.

The approach avoids a situation in which passengers are struggling to use the same physical space at the same time.

graphic

Only now, though, has the idea been put to the test. Jon Hotchkiss, a television producer making a show called This v That, began to consider the same problem of boarding efficiency and came across Dr Steffen's work.

Mr Hotchkiss contacted Dr Steffen, offering to test the idea using a mock-up of a 757 aeroplane in Hollywood and 72 luggage-toting volunteers.

The pair tested five different scenarios: "block" boarding in groups of rows from back to front, one by one from back to front, the "Wilma method", the Steffen method, and completely random boarding.

In all cases, parent-child pairs were permitted to board first - reflecting the fact that regardless of the efficiency of any boarding method, families will likely want to stay together.

The block approach fared worst, with the strict back-to-front approach not much better.

Interestingly, a completely random boarding - as practised by several low-cost airlines that have unallocated seating - fared much better, presumably because it randomly avoids space conflicts.

Boarding methods put to test

  • "Block" boarding - 6:54
  • Back-to-front - 6:11
  • Random - 4:44
  • Wilma method - 4:13
  • Steffen method - 3:36

But the Wilma method and the Steffen method were clear winners; while the block approach required nearly seven minutes to seat the passengers, the Steffen method took just over half that time.

Dr Steffen said that broadly, the results aligned with the predictions he made in 2008.

"As far as the actual amount of time it took to fill the plane, the times didn't agree - because I didn't know how long it took people to put their luggage away and walk down the aisle," he told BBC News.

"The basic conclusions I drew were realised; the method I proposed did the best, and the other ones landed where I would've predicted."

Dr Steffen will now get back to his usual work, putting together plans to find planets around other stars using the Kepler space telescope. But he hopes that commercial airlines will take an interest in his approach - especially given that he estimates it could save them millions.

"I haven't received a phone call yet, but the day is young, so maybe that will change," he said.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 559.

    A saving of three or four minutes is hardly worth the effort seeing as the plane sits there for ages after you've boarded anyway.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 558.

    Most time is taken in lifting hand luggage into overhead storage. Airlines should make a price differential to use the overhead storage or allow people who don't need to use them to board first. Then of the passengers with hand luggage single travellers should board first then groups. The groups sorted back first front last. Late boarders probably account for greater losses than slow boarding.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 557.

    Dr. Steffan's report and most of the comments on it ignore the most important factor: the level of experience of travelers. Conduct an experiment: take 2 identical planes each with 150 seats. 150 seasoned "road warriors" board plane A using any of the current methods. 150 infrequent or first-time flyers board plane B using the Steffan method. Boarding of plane A would be complete far faster!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 556.

    There should be a maths teacher in every departure lounge. The arrogant queue jumpers can then be taken aside and given lessons on numeracy so they learn that row 27 does not lie between 1 and 15. (Incidently when I am waiting in the queue I do not want, as on a recent flight from Frankfurt, to hear your overloud phone conversation, on how you secured your contract or hired an engineer!)

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 555.

    Does Dr Steffen's method assume everyone is a single traveller. What about families who sit next to each other in rows, I suppose you are only going from a gate to a plane connected to it, so it's not as if your leaving them to fend for themselves in the terminal, but it's not ldeal

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 554.

    They could make a mock up of the plane's seating in the waiting area at the gate and then they can make everyone find out where they are sitting and organise the boarding calmly with one of the crew walking up and down telling each person when they can board. After a few boardings they would have it perfectly. They could even have a second crew member inside the plane advising by walkie talkie

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 553.

    552.Kid Chameleon

    Hmmm. Responses in excess of 500 suggest to me the issue is relatively important to quite a few people. Some of them might even be travelling to Somalia for charitable reasons for all we know.

    Not travelling much then, are you? Environmental reasons perhaps?..

    There are plenty of blogs talking about the issues close to your heart. Suggest you direct your energies there.

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 552.

    Does anyone care? Have we resolved all of the big societal concerns such as disease, poverty, over-population, impending food and water crises? No? Well then, might I suggest these people expend a little more effort on those issues and less man hours on guff like this which has no practical value whatsoever.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 551.

    Might not work if you have a family with children and try explaining the method to people from different backgrounds/ages. The following might help:

    1. Only allow "hand baggage" and not big cases/bags. This will provide more luggage space above your seat and avoid walking down aisles to put your hand luggage.

    2. Use doors at the rear of the plane.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 550.

    Well, hey, you know, opening the back as well as front doors, having people (in non-reseverved seats) using those furthest from the entrances, the windows etc. is of course going to be quicker. Having people remove coats etc. BEFORE getting in the plane would also help... standing round while someone strips off 10 layers and stows them is a real PITA

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 549.

    Did the tests include a time allowance for passenger non-comprehension, espcially where several languages are involved?

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 548.

    It makes no difference how you board, because you always get somebody with hand luggage the size of something a family could use for a 2 week holiday. The luggage get jammed against every seat as they try to work their way down the aisle and is so heavy that they can not lift it into the overhead locker or it will not fit. in the end nobody can board until they are finished

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 547.

    546.suzkid

    Ah, condescending as well as melodramatic.

    I get the picture. Don't worry.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 546.

    545.That_Ian
    Glad to hear all those things. Now put saving 3m boarding a flight next to them. Or even better, your churlish comments.

    You seem to be the literal sort & incapable of understanding the point being made - don't worry about it.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 545.

    542.suzkid

    Accounts of life from the concentration camp. I am fully aware of the evil one human can inflict on another. Read quite a few of those memoirs plus visited Auschwitz a number of times. Have you?

    I think you are being a tad melodramatic here, that's all.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 544.

    What about queue at the lounge? You will always have people for positiions > 20 standing in front of the queue and blocking everyone else. My theory 'use all doors', no astrophysics. Yes, you have to modify your aerobridges.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 543.

    If people were allowed to put children in the overhead lockers there wouln't be a problem in the first place.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 542.

    539.That_Ian

    "Your point being?"

    Have you read Primo Levi's "If This Is a Man"? Read it. Then read your comment. Then answer your own question.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 541.

    Any algorithm or method you come up with is quickly thrown out the window as soon as you get 2-3 passengers (and you almost always get this in every flight) who simply want to "take their time" in arranging their belongings and taking their seat... No method can compensate for simple human nature or human stupidity...

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 540.

    As aeroplanes' atmosphere is always stuffy, why not also offer outside seating? Easier access plus only the strong survive. A breath of fresh air (subject to availability).

 

Page 1 of 28

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.