Revealing the secrets of falling to Earth

 
ATV Re-Entry 2008 The return of Jules Verne in 2008 was subjected to a detailed observation campaign

Related Stories

Late on Tuesday (GMT), a huge fireball will streak across the skies over the Pacific Ocean.

Not many will get to see it; it will be over an uninhabited part of the world, and ships and planes have been warned to steer clear of the area.

The event is the return from orbit of Europe's space freighter, ATV-Johannes Kepler.

It has completed its mission at the International Space Station (ISS) and it's now time to come home.

The freighter took up more than seven tonnes of fuel and other supplies to the orbiting outpost, but for its return it has been packed with the platform's rubbish.

Little of the ship or this waste is actually expected to make it all the way to the surface of the Pacific Ocean. Most will simply vaporise in the intense heat generated during the descent through the atmosphere.

ATV (Nasa/Esa) Johannes Kepler has spent the past four months attached to the back of the ISS. It has been filled with all the rubbish from the space station for its destructive return to Earth

This is the second time a European freighter has made the fall to Earth. In 2008, the maiden vessel, Jules Verne, did exactly the same thing.

On that occasion, its brilliant path across the sky was observed by US and European space agency research planes. Their observations produced some remarkable video and some of the most detailed analysis ever done on what happens to a spacecraft when it breaks up on re-entry.

That analysis is still ongoing; scientists continue to debate precisely which components broke away, and when. But they have a broad picture.

"The break-up created a big jigsaw puzzle of pieces," said aircraft observing campaign principal investigator and meteor astronomer Peter Jenniskens of the Seti Institute and Nasa Ames.

"We analysed the colours of those fragments to figure out their composition. The two participating airplanes provided depth perception to trace the fragment paths," he told BBC News.

Falling space debris

Rocket propellant tank (Nasa)
  • Hardware re-enters at shallow angles (<1 degree)
  • Some 50 items weighing >1 tonne re-enter a year
  • Major break-up occurs about 80km altitude
  • 10-40% of dry mass on orbit will survive
  • Debris spreads over long, thin "footprints"
  • It can be a hazard to people and property

Jules Verne was a 13-tonne object when it came back. It engaged the top of the atmosphere at an altitude of about 120km, travelling at about 7.6 km/s.

As it plunged deeper and deeper, it started to tumble. The solar panels were the first obvious casualties - ripped from their mountings about 83-84km up.

As the ship progressed downwards, it got hotter and brighter, creating a multi-coloured fireball - a shower of blues, yellows and oranges.

Spectrometers on the "chase planes" picked up in this light shower the signatures of the various materials in the ship burning off.

"Some fragments show paint peeling off; others show aluminium melting. We even see the main lithium batteries fall apart, creating four dots of bright pink light," said Jenniskens.

If you watch the video on this page, you can pick out a couple of key moments that have generated much debate inside the research team.

The first is a sudden brightening at about 6" into the video. This is a major fragmentation event at 75km altitude.

The ship lets go, severing into two big pieces. It breaks into three large chunks shortly afterwards.

Interestingly, the major fragmentation event does not appear to be the result of a fuel explosion.

"It looks as though it should be," said Jenniskens, "but if it were, there would have been a lot of carbon and hydrogen visible to the instruments."

Watch the video of Jules Verne's break-up

Watch also for "the nose" at about 1'09".

You'll see one bright item move ahead of the debris field. It's very distinctive, and scientists detected the presence of lithium; a spent battery, perhaps?

Jules Verne's debris train eventually disappears from view at about 31km altitude. The team cannot say for sure how much material survived to the surface, but it's thought very little splashed down.

"The results should provide engineers with better tools to understand the re-entry physics of such complicated spacecraft," said project manager Jason Hatton of Esa's Estec facility in Holland.

"That in turn will feed back into better spacecraft design, especially of thermal protection systems, or heatshields, and an improvement in the models that are used to assess debris footprints."

On occasions, spacecraft or old rocket stages will come back to Earth in an uncontrolled manner over land, and safety concerns demand that we have a good idea of where chunks of metal might hit the ground.

REBR The Aerospace Corporation's REBR is about 30cm tall and weighs just a few kilograms

Kepler's return will not be subjected to the same level of analysis.

The type of observation campaign mounted for Jules Verne takes much preparation and analysis. Instead, Kepler has a "blackbox" aboard.

This Re-Entry Breakup Recorder (REBR) will record temperature, acceleration, rotation rate, and other data as Kepler tumbles through the atmosphere.

In the latter moments of re-entry, it should break free from the main debris cloud, right itself and then make an Iridium satellite phone call to downlink everything it has learnt.

The REBR is not intended to survive its impact with the ocean, although - remarkably - the one fitted to the returning Japanese space freighter, HTV-2, in March, did.

It bobbed about on the water for some hours. The unit has been developed by the American Aerospace Corporation, but Europe is developing its own version.

In future, many spacecraft and rockets will carry these devices, especially as they incorporate more composites. There is very limited data on how these materials behave when they fall to Earth.

Recommended: There is an interesting behind-the-scenes video of the Jules Verne descent which ties together what was happening inside the chase planes with what the observers were seeing through their windows.

 
Jonathan Amos, Science correspondent Article written by Jonathan Amos Jonathan Amos Science correspondent

Asteroid impact risks 'underplayed' localisation->translate("watch"); ?>

A visualisation showing where sizeable asteroids have hit the Earth in recent years has been released by the B612 Foundation.

Watch Jonathan's report

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 74.

    At the moment, issues such as this seem to be classified as 'humorous, slightly interesting but nothing to do with me'. One day it will not be quite so fu............................

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 73.

    "Revealing the secrets of falling to Earth"

    ...Bend your knees and try to roll with it.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 72.

    @kohlja
    Objects in orbit will generally fall back to earth in time of their own accord. To fire something out of orbit requires extra fuel which in turn also has to be launched up there, a very expensive process. To be able to fire old hardware out into space would be a massive cost and size increase.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 71.

    Actually, I was hoping to see more colors, kind of like fireworks colors.
    The ISS is only so high in orbit meaning it too will drop out of orbit without additional boost. Add this "can" to the size means a larger booster rocket would be needed to get it higher in orbit . Also it would slow down the orbit speed of the ISS meaning a quicker return to earth. There is still friction to slow.it down.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 70.

    #4

    I think this as well. They spent so much money on putting the ISS up there. But if they had built this transporter with a hatch on the front and a hatch on the back, not only could they be used to deliver cargo, but bolt onto each other to extend the space station volume at a lower cost.

 

Comments 5 of 74

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.