The man who looked inside the atom

The structure of the atom Everyone now knows the basic atomic structure that Rutherford discovered

Related Stories

"We're celebrating something really important. We're celebrating nothing less than the birth of modern physics."

As eulogies go, Dr Andrew Taylor's opening remarks at a conference to mark the one hundredth anniversary of Ernest Rutherford's description of the atom takes some beating.

More's the pity then that this rousing soliloquy, and the speeches that followed, were heard only by a relatively small audience drawn exclusively from within the physics community. A handful of scientists preaching to the converted.

Rutherford's status within that community has never been in doubt, but the physicist and author Graham Farmelo believes the father of nuclear physics deserves much wider acclaim.

"Rutherford's discovery of the structure of the atom is right up there in 20th century science among the greatest discoveries. Right next to Crick and Watson's description of DNA".

To understand why Rutherford inspires such flights of rhetoric we need to scroll back to the turn of the last century, to a period in which JJ Thomson was discovering the electron, and Henri Becquerel was investigating the properties of radioactivity. A period in which the 'plum pudding' model of the atom held sway.

Ernest Rutherford Rutherford's discovery was a pivotal moment in modern physics

Working with Hans Geiger and and Ernest Marsden in Manchester, Rutherford (who had already received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his work on the transmutation of atoms) devised an experiment that involved bombarding a thin sheet of gold foil with Alpha particles.

Most of the particles passed straight through, but every now and then one was deflected onto a fluorescing plate. It was an astonishing observation, and one that took Rutherford the best part of two years to explain.

As he later recalled, "it was as if a 15-inch naval shell had been fired at a piece of tissue paper and bounced back".

What Rutherford realised was that the mass of an atom could not be evenly spread out - like plums in a pudding - but must be focused at its core. Only a solid, dense nucleus would have the mass to divert an energetic Alpha particle set on a collision course. The resulting paper, The Scattering of Alpha and Beta Particles by Matter and the Structure of the Atom, was published in the Philosophical Magazine a hundred years ago this month.

It was Rutherford's intuitive leap to a new 'planetary' model of the atom - where individual electrons orbit a solid central nucleus - that Graham Farmelo argues was one of the most profound insights of 20th century science.

Physicist Graham Farmelo on Rutherford's discovery: "It was absolutely critical to modern physics."

"He was the first person to see that the atom has this weird structure with almost all its mass concentrated in a tiny core that he called the nucleus. On that fundamental insight we've built the whole edifice of the quantum understanding of the atom".

It's an appreciation of one man's vision that's shared by the nuclear physicist, and key-note speaker at the Rutherford 100 conference, Professor Jim Al-Khalili.

"Although science doesn't really work this way you can always pick those wonderful moments when there's a huge breakthrough. Galileo pointing a telescope up into the sky. Hooke looking down a microscope and drawing a flea. Rutherford describing the structure of the atom is another one of these pivotal moments".

A microscopic-black-hole being produced in the collision of two protons Modern atom-smashers at Cern have continued Rutherfords work

Exactly why Rutherford's name has failed to make it into the select band of scientists whose achievements transcended their own discipline, propelling them into the public consciousness, remains a mystery. The obvious parallel is with the great theoretical physicist of the early 20th Century, Albert Einstein.

But there is still one avenue for Rutherford to achieve the renown his achievements deserve. The atom smashing experiment he designed gave us the basic structure of the atom. A hundred years on another - admittedly somewhat more powerful atom smashing machine - the Large Hadron Collider stands poised to complete that picture with the discovery of the Higgs boson.

It would be a fitting tribute to a great scientist if the experimental physicists at Cern managed to achieve that in the centenary year of Rutherford's backscattering experiment.

Tom Feilden Article written by Tom Feilden Tom Feilden Science correspondent, Today

Citizen science is the new black

Tom Feilden examines citizen science - the trend for involving amateurs in research projects - and asks whether it is real science or just good PR.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 8.

    Robert Hooke: Astronomer, inventor (spirit level, iris diaphragm, universal joint, sash window, clock escapement, air gun, diving bell etc) scientist (Boyle's law was Hookes!) Hooke's law on springs, conceptualised gravity (Newtons work based on Hookes) Brownian motion was Hookes work rediscovered, Halley's comet was Hookes and architect. Proposed evolution 200 years before Darwin. Utter Genius

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    The fact that there is a large proportion of the public that do not know rutherford and the basic model that is taught at GCSE is simply a sad statement about science education in the UK. The fact that at a great deal of schools single award science is the only option is shocking. It leaves the public so open to the pseudo science particularly in regard to creationism and "alternative" medicine.

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    I'm interested in the comment "Everyone now knows the basic atomic structure that Rutherford discovered".

    First, it's interesting because it's not the basic atomic structure, it's a convenient model which isn't literally true.

    Second, because research in "scientific literacy" seems to suggest that a high %age of people aren't familiar with the Rutherfordian model...

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Did you know that in the early years of the 20th century, 'plum pudding' was not a sponge pudding containing plums but what we would call Christmas pudding (containing currants and raisins). This changes our perception of Thomson's plum pudding model - not the name Thomson used for his model. He never thought of the electrons as stationary objects like currants in a Christmas pudding.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Thoroughly agree with the article. As a certified geek and physics teacher he is my official class mascot. I was in Rutherford hall at uni, had a friend who lived in his old residence in Bushey, London (allegedly), my parents live in the next village to where he was born and grew up in NZ (Brightwater),and I have visited his primary school.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    I think its a good idea to start a list of the great unsung. Perhaps then we could start to do something about them getting some more recognition.
    A small selection. Maxwell, Dirac, John Bell.

    Non Physicists welcome :)

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    The "15 inch shell" comment is a rare but vivid image which sums up the tremendous discovery in a brilliant way.

    And while on the subject of "unknown heroes", how about Rosalind Franklin who provided the key evidence (double helix) of DNA for Crick, Watson and Wilkins?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    How many scientists do make it into the public consciousness? Very very few. If Einstein hadn't looked so like the mad scientist, as well as coming up with such counter-intuitive ideas, he probably wouldn't have made it either. Rutherford at least is known to every 6th form scientist, and, like Einstein, has an element named after him.Real unsung heroes? Horrocks,Young, etc. Not enough space!



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.