What if the Soviet Union had beaten the US to the Moon?

 
Infographic How would history have unfolded if a flag with one star instead of 50 had been planted on the Moon?

The Americans won the race to the Moon when Neil Armstrong set foot on the lunar surface in 1969.

That single act trumped the Soviet achievement of sending the first man into space eight years earlier. But what might have happened if the Soviet Union had got to the Moon first?

The first manned lunar landing was a triumph for Nasa, and when the Americans won the Space Race, they also sounded its death knell.

The Apollo lunar programme continued until 1972 and 12 astronauts touched down on the Moon's surface. But US TV networks quickly bored of the Moon landings. When politicians lost interest, the Apollo programme was scrapped.

Of course, we have not been back since. Instead, human exploration of space has been confined to low-Earth orbit.

Piers Bizony, who has co-written a biography of Gagarin called Starman, says: "The Russians were in the business of conquering space... The Americans felt they were in a race and the nature of a race is that once you think you've won it you tend to stop running."

Had the Soviets got to the Moon first it is unlikely that they would have abandoned it as swiftly as the Americans.

Not being a democracy may have enabled the USSR to spend money and marshal the talents of their population in a way that America could not.

Start Quote

Those who imagine Apollo had the Moon race to itself are wrong”

End Quote Piers Bizony Yuri Gagarin biographer

Space historian Dr Christopher Riley believes that not only would the Soviet Union have continued with Moon missions, but they might also have built lunar bases.

And he believes that the Americans would have been compelled to do the same and even try to continue to outdo their communist rivals.

"The history that followed in the decades afterwards would have been completely different," he says.

Summer of '69

In the summer of 1969, when the Apollo 11 crew were on their way to the Moon, US vice-president, Spiro Agnew declared that America would be on Mars by 1980. At the time, this was seen as a relatively feasible goal given how fast things had progressed in the 1960s.

"They certainly had it in their minds and on their drawing boards and there were designs of methods to get to Mars that might have been put into action in response to a Soviet landing on the Moon," says Dr Riley.

Apollo 8 picture of the lunar far side The US seems to have taken a lead when it launched Apollo 8 into lunar orbit

So how close were we to following this alternative reality?

Quite close, according to Piers Bizony: "Those who imagine Apollo had the Moon race to itself are wrong," he says.

The US seemed to have taken the lead in 1968 when it successfully boosted three astronauts into lunar orbit with its Apollo 8 mission.

But the Americans rushed ahead with that mission because they were afraid that the Soviet Union was about to beat them yet again and pull off another space coup.

The USSR was using a rocket called the Proton which is still in use today. The Soviets were sending payloads into space with a view to putting a cosmonaut into a so-called circumlunar flight which would take him around the Moon and straight home again without going into orbit.

They had flown an unmanned mission a few months before Apollo 8 that had taken just such a trajectory around Earth's natural satellite.

The Soviets had also built their own Moon rocket (known as the N-1) and their own lunar lander.

Winning streak

So how did the Americans win?

The first seeds were sown in 1957 by President Eisenhower following the launch of the first satellite by the USSR.

N-1 rocket The USSR designed its own Moon rocket, but it proved a spectacular failure during launch tests

The launch of Sputnik 1 generated fear across the US - and a quiet realisation that the country had fallen technologically behind the Soviet Union.

President Dwight Eisenhower's response was to increase the budget for education to raise the academic standard in universities across America.

Dr Riley comments: "To increase the brainpower they'd need to pull off these technological feats to take on the Russians and win."

Eisenhower also commissioned the Saturn V rockets, principally to launch multi-tonne satellites for spying. But when President Kennedy inherited the White House and had to respond to Gagarin's flight, the Saturn V was already in development.

It was the Saturn V rocket that enabled the US to send astronauts to the Moon.

The early Soviet Space triumphs were managed and steered by Korolev the man who built the R7 rocket that put Sputnik and Yuri Gagarin into orbit.

But after Korolev's death in 1966, the Soviet space effort lost focus.

Because he was not there to assert his authority, there was not one Soviet attempt to reach the Moon, but several rival schemes to reach the Moon.

Computing power

According to Piers Bizony, the rival schemes sucked resources from each other: "There was a great deal of confusion in the Soviet space effort in the late 1960s and as a result they didn't have the technology to send a man to the Moon," he says.

Nor did they have the computing power. By today's standards the Apollo 11 onboard computer was pretty crude, but it was ahead of its time and was crucial for America's successful Moon landings.

LM Apollo 11 Crude computers were vital for the success of the US Moon landings

Who might have been first to walk on the Moon in this alternative reality is anyone's guess. Yuri Gagarin died in 1968 in a plane crash and so would not have been available for any Soviet Moon shot. In any case he was too much of a national treasure to have been sent on such a risky mission.

However, if Korolev had lived a little longer and if Soviet spies had stolen US computer technology, then the Moon might well have been colonised and have been a base for international manned missions to Mars and - perhaps - beyond.

But 50 years on from Gagarin's historic flight, the Russians will once again be the planet's pre-eminent space-faring nation. This year, the US will retire its space shuttle fleet, its only craft capable of sending astronauts into space.

According to Mr Bizony: "America has no clear idea of what will replace the shuttle and no clear idea of whether as a nation they are truly committed to the human spaceflight adventure.

"Meanwhile Russia will be flying American astronauts and those from other countries on board their Soyuz capsule. And that Soyuz lifts on a rocket very similar in its essential construction to the one that launched Yuri Gagarin."

 

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -36

    Comment number 95.

    We Americans have spent a lot of money defending Europe from the Soviets and still maintain a presence that we really don't need out of lingering mistrust of Russia. Europe spent what they might otherwise have on defense on social welfare programs and should now take up the mantle of manned space flight rather than wonder why the US can no longer afford to maintain its presence in space flight.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 67.

    It seems NASA are losing ground after scrapping the Shuttle and planning more robots than real manned exploration. Good luck to Russia, but this is what America should be saying also. I'm sure many people would stand up to go to Mars for eg, regardless of the risks. Afterall that is what spaceflight is all about. We need more real space exploration and this is an area the UK should get involved.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 60.

    An interesting notion here, although the progression of fuel powered space flight will not be practical in the future with the dreams bandied round - the simple fact of escaping earth's gravity wastes most of the payload, and we need to either develop space craft built in the outer atmosphere to give the boost away from the gravitational pull. Or space elevators in the distant future. Sci-fi truth

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 59.

    If the USSR had won the Space Race, not just the status of the moon, but the entire history of the world from then on will have been turned on it's head. Think about all the historical events from the 1970's onwards that are related with the loss of Soviet confidence after the Moon Landing. 1989 would certainly have been a different year to the one we know. And everything else that followed that.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 45.

    Human space flight is expensive. The moon missions are enormously expensive. That is why there are no moon colonies and were no further manned missions. The fact that we are still talking about who was first decades after the events proves that the main purpose of manned missions is national pride not knowledge. Robotic missions have done far more science, far cheaper and safer.

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

More Science & Environment stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • Lake Chapala in Mexico (Pic: Joel Espinosa/Flickr)Crossing borders

    Illegal migration between Mexico and the US is not all one way

Programmes

  • The deep water submarineFast Track Watch

    Pushing the limits of tourism - how much would you pay for a real voyage to the bottom of sea?

bbc.co.uk navigation

BBC © 2012 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.