NFL safety: Is American football too violent?

 
Tight end Heath Miller #83 of the Pittsburgh Steelers makes a reception and is tackled by linebacker Wesley Woodyard #52 and defensive back Mike Adams #20 of the Denver Broncos Fans are attracted to football's big hits, but some are troubled by the long-term consequences

Some American football fans are worried that the National Football League is too brutal to be enjoyed. Can the sport change course?

Charlie Camosy is a big fan of American football.

"It's a great combination of raw caveman strength and gladiatorial combat and the most complicated chess match you can ever imagine," he says, noting that this time of year - when football returns - is one of his favourites.

But Camosy is also a professor of Christian ethics at Fordham University in New York. And this year, he's feeling more and more conflicted about watching the sport he loves when he knows it can be so dangerous.

"Even though I'm excited for the start of the year, we need to be honest about the fact that football is a violent sport, and many things that people like about it, including me, is the violence. It's not just violence in the abstract, it's people's lives who are tremendously impacted by this." says Camosy.

Football has always been a brutal sport: in the early days of the game, President Theodore Roosevelt threatened to shut the college programme down unless the young men from Harvard, Princeton and Yale stopped dying on the field.

One of the National Football League' s most memorable games was the 1985 match between the Washington Redskins and the New York Giants, when Giants defensive player Lawrence Taylor tackled quarterback Joe Theisman with such force that Theisman's leg snapped in two, bone and blood visible on the field.

"Football and violence is nothing new whatsoever," says Frank Deford, sports commentator for National Public Radio and author of Over Time: My Life As a Sports Writer. In the past, that violence has ebbed and flowed as rule changes sought to limit the damage. "It's gone back to a peak again, and the question is whether you can correct the game," he says.

Football v rugby

Though rugby itself can be a violent game, it pales in comparison to American football. American football players are larger and stronger than rugby players. They also wear more protective equipment - which makes the sport more dangerous, not less.

"In rugby you don't play with helmets, there are no pads, you can't possibly inflict the type of bodily damage that you can in football when you're in the armour," says Frank Deford. He believes that if American football players wore pads that more closely resembled rugby gear, there might me fewer injuries.

The BBC on rugby v football

The current state of professional football means that the violence is more impressive to watch - and has more long-lasting consequences.

"We have a better idea of how the story ends now," says Will Leitch, a contributing editor at New York Magazine. The life-long football fan wrote an article earlier this month called "Is Football Wrong?"

His article echoes recent blog posts made by writers like Ta Nehesi Coates and Andrew Sullivan. In each case, the arguments are similar: the hits are getting bigger and harder, and the evidence we have about the long-term effect on player's brains are getting harder to ignore.

"We're creating, essentially, missiles of people's bodies banging into each other in the most dramatic ways. We haven't seen the people with 300lb (136kg) bodies who can run the 40-yard dash in 4.6 seconds," says Camosy. "That kind of force has never existed in the human body before."

Mounting evidence shows that the damage caused by repeated concussions can have lasting health consequences for American football players. These men are more likely to die from diseases caused by damaged brain cells, like Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or Alzheimer's disease, according to a new study in the journal Neurology.

Medical experts suspect repeated head trauma can lead to mental illness and suicide, and there have been a rash of former NFL player suicides in the past.

Shortly before committing suicide last year, Dave Duerson, a former player for the Chicago Bears, sent a text message to his family requesting that his brain be donated to a facility that researches football injuries.

Junior Seau during a football game Junior Seau committed suicide in 2012. His death has not been linked to brain damage, but triggered safety questions

"He was one of my favourite players," says Leitch. "The idea that he was mush at the end, the way he committed suicide to make sure his brain could be preserved...It's hard to then be like 'Yeah, jack em up! Huge hits!'"

But the huge hits are still drawing lots of fans.

The first Sunday Night Football game of the 2012-2013 season brought in record ratings this week, with almost 25 million Americans tuning in to watch the Denver Broncos defeat the Pittsburgh Steelers. According to TVLine.com, that number represents a 7% increase over last year and the best rating for a regular season football game in 14 years.

For its part, the National Football League is doing what it can to stem the damage done by the sport. Recently, the league donated $30m (£18.7m) to the National Institutes of Health to study brain injuries.

"Our commitment is to keep pushing the envelope and be one of the leaders in health and safety research," says Clare Graff, the senior manager of corporate communications at the NFL. She points out that head injuries are an issue of concern for other sports, not just football.

Football fathers weigh in

  • Kurt Warner, retired pro-footballer: "[O]bviously when you understand the size, the speed, the violence of the game, and then you couple that with situations like Junior Seau — was that a ramification of all the years playing? And things that go with that. It scares me as a dad."
  • Bart Scott, New York Jets: "I don't want my son to play football. I play football so he doesn't have to... I don't want to have to deal with him getting a concussion and what it would be like later in life."
  • Andrew Blecher, sports medicine physician: "I will educate my son and make sure that he is well aware of the risk vs reward decision himself. If he decides on his own that he wants to play, then I will help him personally and I will also help his community to make sure that there is adequate injury awareness and prevention."

At the same time, the NFL is constantly revising rules to try to limit the long-term damage done to players, and does so knowing that its rules and safety regulations are often adopted by youth and college programs.

"We want to set the standard and we take that responsibility seriously," she says.

Whether or not they can make the game safe for kids, not just for professionals, may be what eventually determines American football's fate.

"What you are hearing for the first time is 'I don't want to see my child playing football'," says NPR's Frank Deford.

"I don't think we've come to the point where I've heard anyone say I'm not going to a professional game."

That's something both Leitch and Camosy understand all too well. Both men will be tuning into the football season this year despite their reservations.

"I'm going to watch football but it's almost with a sense of sadness this year - a growing sense of sadness," Camosy asks.

"How long can I watch football and still keep my soul?"

 

More on This Story

In today's Magazine

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 126.

    "It's a great combination of raw caveman strength and gladiatorial combat and the most complicated chess match you can ever imagine,"

    lol this is what Americans actually believe. If they are so tough why do they need padding?

    "ooooh don't start yet i haven't put my pillows on"

    I'll just be over here enjoying sports that aren't 90% advertisements.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 125.

    To #57 - Dude, that's the oldest putdown in the book. Larry Flynt. Isadora Duncan. Madonna. John Holmes. Look 'em up . . .

    This debate is entirely akin to the 'violence in ice hockey' brouhaha which happens each year, the naysayers all jump on the bandwagon when a star gets hurt or there is a big brutal hit on some lesser-known. The businesses, particularly the NFL, are 'too big to fail'.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 124.

    119.Typical_English_No8
    Rugby is more dangerous as the players wear less protective gear"

    Well, no actually. AF and Rugby are 2 entirely different games - AF is faster and the tackles are different - if they played AF with no pads it would be far more dangerous. If Rugby removed the rules on safe tackling then you might have a comparison

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 123.

    I believe that everyone is forgetting about Hurling, Gaelic Football and Aussie Rules for being a tad rough.

    As for American Football......it's a misnomer......99.9% is played with hands......should really be called American Handall..........

    As for watching it....I'd rather stick hot pins in my eyes.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 122.

    Rugby League makes US Football look like a little boy's game.
    Seriously, the amount of protection the players wear is over the top.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 121.

    Many sports are risky activities. Soccer, Rugby, NFL, F1, Boxing, Horse Racing all contain risk and limiting sporting activity to golf and table tennis would reduce their appeal. Unlike some posters below I enjoy sports from different countries and will continue to enjoy NFL. Equally I hope the NFL along with other sporting bodies continue to penalise overtly dangerous behaviour.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 120.

    I used to wear a T-shirt with the slogan – ‘Rugby, Cultured Violence’. Sports like this are aggressive and players go in hard, but I don’t see it is actually ‘violent’. play is controlled by rules which the ref ensures the play adheres to

    Of course if you don’t like that sort of thing, don’t watch it and certainly don’t complain about it; stop spoiling other peoples pleasures

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 119.

    Is this story for real or is it a wind up? Is this a late April fools?
    Too violent? Have you seen the size of the helmets and pads these guys wear? And have you seen the size of the blokes that play the sport, they are huge. If anything, Rugby is more dangerous as the players wear less protective gear. If you don't like it, dont watch it, you utter pansie.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 118.

    Saw an American football game with my family in Brooklyn years back.The most boring 3 hours of my life.No wonder the game has never gained any popularity outside the US,despite all the attempts over the years.

  • rate this
    -28

    Comment number 117.

    Britain, please. Keep your safe-gun-free-knife-crime-filled-society away from my America! Violence is why the US is #1, and Britain is...#1...well you were #1 at one time, correct?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 116.

    The hardest sports Ive seen live are in this order:

    Ice Hockey
    Rugby League
    American Football

    nothing else comes close to these three for impact and hits. Rugby Union practically bans big impact collisions with its rules.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 115.

    Everyone that is complaining about the brutal nature of the game, return to the colliseum etc: the difference is, these athletes actually choose to play the game. The gladiators were just thrown in a prison and handed a spear! You could say that people only watch F1 for the crashes, but they choose to risk it. Bungee jumping is risky too..CHOICE!

    That said, it doesn't make it any less boring....

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 114.

    In rugby, you have to use your arms to tackle whereas in american football you can shoulder charge. If you introduced laws to make shoulder charges illegal you would find that you would get less injuries in american football.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 113.

    Really the only people who should be commenting on the brutality of American football are those who have played the game. There are those who think that any form of aggression is wrong-therefore any games which require aggression are also "wrong". People against violence in football shouldn't watch. Would the world really be a better place is we taught our boys to knit instead of "play" football?

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 112.

    Violent "sports" only appeal to knuckledragging thickos.

    I'll probably offend right wing PC by saying that.

  • rate this
    +20

    Comment number 111.

    It was the introduction of the boxing glove that led to deaths in the ring because the glove protected the hand of the puncher who was encouraged to punch harder.

    I suspect that if you removed the safety padding from these players it would become less violent.

    For instance the safest cars on the road would be the ones with explosives in their wings.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 110.

    Ha, people claiming a spot where the players have more protection than most of their undergeared troops is too brutal, classic

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 109.

    Why do American Football articles always attract bunches of Rugby fans and players asserting how much tougher their sport is? I can only imagine that this constant need to remind everyone how macho they are is due to deep-rooted insecurities about their masculinity. I think they protest too much, if you know what I mean.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 108.

    I would like to add that I actually enjoy watching American Football, it's a great combination of strategy, controlled violence and athleticism. I would also recommend wheelchair rugby for the same reasons and hope to see some more on terrestrial TV following the Paralympics.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 107.

    When working as a gym instructor, I studied American Football training. Honestly, you think that our footballers are dedicated? These guys have a science dedicated to everything they do.

    Training, nutrition, sleep, supplements, psychology, it takes over your life.

    My respect goes out to those who do it, although it must be hugely stressful. It certainly wouldn't be for me.

 

Page 13 of 19

 

Features

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.