Light pollution: Is there a solution?
Few people in the UK now have a clear view of the night sky because of light pollution. The fight is on to reclaim the stars, but what are the possible solutions?
Look at the sky at night and what do you see? Not much most probably. Even in the countryside the stars are becoming harder to spot, with the sky glow caused by light pollution now visible for up to 50 miles (80km).
Only one 10th of the country now enjoys a truly dark sky, says the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), which carries out an annual star count. In the 1950s most of us would have been able to see the Milky Way.
Because light at night has brought indisputable benefits, its use has expanded to the point where it is "inescapable", said a Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) into artificial light and the environment.
"We are losing arguably the most culturally universal and historically pristine of all natural vistas," it warned.
Find out more
- Stargazing Live is on BBC Two, 16-18 January at 20:00 GMT
- The Great Big Dulverton Switch-off is on 18 January at 20:00 GMT
To highlight the impact of light pollution on stargazing the entire population of Dulverton in Somerset is being asked to switch off their lights on Wednesday evening to show the contrast, as part of BBC Two's Stargazing Live.
Lighting at night is a complicated, often emotive issue as it provides valuable benefits as well as creating problems. But campaigners say they do not want all artificial lighting turned off at night, just the huge amount that is needlessly shone into the night sky every year. Sentiments shared by the Royal Commission.
As well as blighting the view of the night sky, inefficient lighting wastes over £1bn a year in the UK alone, according to the Astronomical Association's Campaign for Dark Skies (CfDS).
It has been blamed for disrupting the migration of birds, the breeding patterns of nocturnal animals and insect populations. Research has also shown it disrupts people's sleep patterns, while one study has suggested a link to breast cancer.
So with increasing calls for artificial light to be used only "when and where it is needed", what are the possible solutions to help ease the problem?
Intelligent lighting systems
You're in bed, but you can't sleep because the street light outside is too bright. So you send a text and minutes later it's turned off. Problem solved. Controlling street lighting, right down to individual lamps, could soon be possible thanks to intelligent lighting systems.
They use wireless technology to control lights from a central management system. It means at any time lamps could be adjusted in response to weather, circumstance and individual need. Sensors, texting and email could be utilised to convey the information.
Dark blue areas have least light pollution
"The potential is enormous," says Jacob van der Pol, product marketing and business development manager for smart lighting, NXP Semiconductors (Netherlands). "If there is a football match, the lights in the area can be told to come on when everyone is leaving and dimmed after they have gone. The technology allows you to adapt to circumstance."
Until now such systems have only been produced on a small scale, for individual houses and businesses, and have been expensive. This has made them unsuitable for street lighting because of the large number of individual lamps used, an estimated nine million in the UK. But the technology involved is now cheaper and it can also be installed in existing lamps so lighting stock does not necessarily have to be replaced, just updated.
Such a scheme has already been installed in the German village of Dorentrup and NXP Semiconductors is working with one of Holland's main energy suppliers on a project.
"The way street light is managed now is so outdated," says Van der Pol. "This technology has been born out of customer demand. People want more control."
He also points out there is the potential for it to be a new revenue stream for councils, as they could charge a small amount for each text. Something that might get the attention of cash-strapped local authorities.
There are issues with such schemes. Certain usage might increase disturbance, said the Royal Commission. The sudden activation of lights against a dark background might be more intrusive than a continuous light for those who have problems sleeping, or more disruptive to foraging nocturnal mammals or birds.
Ban 'Rottweiler' lights
They have been branded "Rottweiler lights" by critics - the 500-watt halogen lights attached to homes up and down the country, illuminating gardens and drives.
Being in a town doesn't stop me
I've always loved astronomy, but it seemed out of my reach. I thought you needed expensive equipment and a certain amount of knowledge to even get started, but you don't. After last year's Stargazing Live I joined the Astronomical Society, saved up for a telescope and now I'm hooked.
I live in central Dartford in Kent and the area is heavily light polluted. I haven't let that stop me. I've built an 8ft (2.4m), fold-away screen out of wood and weed membrane. It's very lightweight and I use it to block street lights when I am out with my telescope.
City astronomy is a challenge, but it is really is amazing what you can see. I keep a book and note down everything I see. They've included things like the Andromeda Galaxy and the Globular Cluster in Pegasus. I even recently photographed Jupiter.
I could stay in the garden all night looking up. My husband must feel like he's lost me to the night sky.
Everyone from local councils to lighting engineers and government committees have recommended less powerful lights, but they are still being bought - often for as little as £4.48 - and fitted every day. They are too bright, too sensitive and often badly angled, sending unwanted light into neighbouring windows and the night sky, say critics.
Northumberland's Longstone Lighthouse, Britain's most powerful lighthouse, uses a 1,000-watt light source, yet people use 500-watt lamps to light a garden, says Bob Mizon, UK co-ordinator of the CfDS.
"Even if they are triggered by movement, it means next door's cat can set them off repeatedly. It's the equivalent of strapping on a microwave to the side of your house and putting it on for a few minutes about 50 times a day. They use so much energy and it's unnecessary. We're not saying get rid of the light, just use one that is appropriate."
Nigel Parry, from the Institution of Lighting Engineers, which publishes guidelines for good lighting, says the best security lights are not the brightest. "A 100-watt light can do the job well."
Critics argue that rather than boosting security, they actually dazzle so it is difficult to see, and create dark shadows which are better for hiding in.
The CPRE has called for them to be withdrawn from the shelves of DIY superstores and other retailers, saying there is no need for such anti-social, environmentally-unfriendly products on the mass market. Government committees have also recommended an outright ban in the past.
But Parry says there is anecdotal evidence that sales are actually on the rise, as councils start to turn off street lighting to conserve energy and money.
Homebase says it works "very closely with suppliers and in-store colleagues to ensure that customers are informed about how to reduce light pollution and considerate lighting when they purchase outdoor lighting".
Change the law
As it stands the UK has no national law that is just dedicated to reducing light pollution.
"It's illegal to dump rubbish in the street or the sea, so why isn't it illegal to dump rubbish into the sky?" asks Mizon. "It's just about the only part of our environment that isn't already protected."
Others countries have taken the unusual step of adopting such a law. The Czech Republic was the first in the world to do so in 2002. People can be fined if they do not comply. Slovenia has now followed. Dark-sky legislation is also on the books in several Italian regions and some US states.
Where artificial light goes
- 1. Upwards reflected light - unwanted but unavoidable light bouncing off the ground
- 2. Useful light - the right amount of light
- 3. Direct upwards light - wasted light shining above a fitting
- 4. Spill light - falls outside where it is needed
- 5. Intrusive light - overly bright and poorly directed, often going in windows
Source: RCEP and Environmental Protection UK
The UK has light pollution legislation but campaigners want the government to go further.
"What we have in this country is a series of bits of legislation so we can deal with some aspects of light pollution," says Martin Morgan-Taylor, principal lecturer in Law at Leicester's De Montfort University.
The Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 did criminalise light pollution. It made it a statutory nuisance in England and Wales and subject to the same criminal law as noise and smells.
In Scotland it comes under the Public Health etc (Scotland Act 2008) and in Northern Ireland the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act (Northern Ireland) 2011.
"The problem with the current situation is that it's dependent on the attitude of local authorities," says Emma Marrington. "Some take light pollution seriously and will follow up complaints, other will just tell you to buy thicker curtains."
The Defra spokesperson said: "We are undertaking work to reduce the negative impacts of artificial light in a number of areas. This includes providing guidance on limiting light pollution to be included in local authority planning documents. We are also commissioning a research report to look at the effects of artificial light on biodiversity".
A big switch-off
"Lights Out" programmes have been successfully adopted around the world. Over 17 US cities participate, including New York and Chicago, and several in Canada. In the UK there is no such initiative.
The programme involves businesses turning off or dimming all decorative lighting at night during bird migration season. Artificial light confuses them and millions die every year by flying into windows. Nearly all tall buildings in Chicago co-operate for almost five months of the year, say organisers. Both birds and large amounts of energy are saved.
Tips to stargaze from a town
- Look for space, like a park
- Look for a clear horizon so you can see as much of the sky as possible
- Use a red torch to read charts and move around as it doesn't affect your ability to see in the dark so much
- You can put a sweet wrapper over a normal torch, paint it with nail varnish or use your bike light
Source: Dan Hillier, Royal Observatory Edinburgh
A "Lights Out London" campaign was organised in 2007, but it was for only one hour on one day. Campaigners say it's a missed opportunity.
"So many lights are left on in offices at night," says Mizon. "It can't be the case that every one is being cleaned at exactly the same time, throughout the night. It's staggering when you think of the light pollution and wasted energy."
Other countries also have annual "switch-off" events. Belgium has a "Night of Darkness" every year in certain areas, where street and public lighting are switched off for one night to promote the issue of light pollution.
The World Wildlife Fund promotes its annual "Earth Hour" in the UK and lights are switched off, but says the event is about the wider issue of global warming rather than light pollution.
Friends of the Earth do not specifically campaign on light pollution here, although it says it does come into its work. Neither does the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). The only event that is both annual and national is the CPRE's star count, say campaigners. This year it runs for a week from 20 January.
~RS~q~RS~postId=111459350~RS~z~RS~44~RS~)

Chaos and suspicion in Cairo mortuary
How safe are US road bridges?
Dog years: The calculator
Syria town under heavy army shelling
Foot loose
Life span
Tweets of the week
African anthems
Working Lives Ecuador
Click
Comment number 118.
landscape18th January 2012 - 10:29
Street lights, Sun-Thurs switch off every other light midnight to 5am. Fri/Sat nights more folk about later turn off after 2am.
500w security lights, unecessary. 100w to light your garden or outside your house is plenty.
Offices, educate people, last out switch off! Simple.
Save money, more available for education/health care etc and help the environment/birds/insects etc.
Link to this (Comment number 118)
Comment number 117.
Robert Lucien18th January 2012 - 10:28
The night time stars are one of the most wonderful and inspiring sights a person can have - living in the remote countryside as a child I had the rare chance to actually see them properly here in the UK (in remote Northumberland).
You don't have to go to the big cities to get light pollution. Walking at night even in many rural places the sky is dominated by the ugly yellow glow..
Link to this (Comment number 117)
Comment number 116.
S_Lawlor18th January 2012 - 4:03
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 116)
Comment number 115.
Peter_Sym18th January 2012 - 10:23
#110 Lakenheath is light up like a Xmas tree for 2 reasons: firstly planes land at night & runway lights help ensure they land on the runway & not on top of your house. The other reason is that nuclear weapons are potentially on sight & there are plenty of people think its justified to break into airbases and sabotage the aircraft and/or weapons.
Link to this (Comment number 115)
Comment number 114.
vertaler18th January 2012 - 10:22
as for street and car lighting... road safety is 8mproved when there is no lighting, as gilbertonline said. the whole nation managed splendidly with blackout covers for headlights during the war - and guess what: no dazzling by oncoming rottweiler headllghts (surely a cause of many - near - accidents)
Link to this (Comment number 114)
Comment number 113.
Keith18th January 2012 - 10:22
I would prefer all street lighting to go off about midnight, it is just not needed.
Link to this (Comment number 113)
Comment number 112.
yiannis18th January 2012 - 10:21
"i always like astrology so I joined the astrological society..."
bless it made me laugh.....
Link to this (Comment number 112)
Comment number 111.
BobP18th January 2012 - 10:20
#29.IanKemmish
LEDs are cheaper to run and appear brighter, but are not as effective at lighting objects.
The discrete wavelengths of LEDs look bright to the eye, but each is either absorbed or reflected by objects, giving an on/off effect and poor depth.
They are great for being seen (rear bike lights) but poor at lighting objects to be seen.
I would not want to see them as street lights
Link to this (Comment number 111)
Comment number 110.
anotherfakename18th January 2012 - 10:20
Lakenheath airbase has lamps pointing all over the place - so bad that the entire 'warren' (walking area at the back of the town) is unusable in the dark because your night vision is impaired. What a waste of energy and land. Totally unnecessary as well.
There is a garage on the A1065 with lamps shining in the eyes of motorists.
We need a law so it we complain these lights get turned off.
Link to this (Comment number 110)
Comment number 109.
LukeLoz18th January 2012 - 10:18
All the light bulbs in my house have in total 300W. But my electric kettle is taking over 1000W. Maybe somebody will think about that? Microwave kettle? Rather then waste time on such a pointless discussion. We need a lights on the streets as well as in the cars. There is a massive waste of money, but not on the street lights. I think that everybody knows about who and what I am talking about?
Link to this (Comment number 109)
Comment number 108.
jonbanjo18th January 2012 - 10:16
"Britain's most powerful lighthouse, uses a 1,000-watt light source and is visible from 25 miles, yet people use 500-watt lamps to light a garden"
So? One's a focused beam and the other floodlighting a wide area. How many watts to floodlight a football field?
Link to this (Comment number 108)
Comment number 107.
GrowMoreApples18th January 2012 - 10:13
I am not in favour of all night lighting, lighting is generally intrusive.
Having visitied some European cities such as Pisa, I was struck at the greater distance between lights on back streets.
Equally there appers to be a trend for households to floodlight their houses as if it where a grand palace. If people fear security install motion sensor activated lights rather than blanket lighting.
Link to this (Comment number 107)
Comment number 106.
Little_Old_Me18th January 2012 - 10:12
Somewhere in the last year our local County Council (Devon) started turning our (largely unnecessary) street lights off from midnight to 6am.
It's been wonderful ever since, with only small drawback....
....when I wake in the "wee" hours needing to pop to the bathroom (I am of a certain age) it's pitch black, but so what, a small price to pay for an over all better nights sleep.
Link to this (Comment number 106)
Comment number 105.
vertalerComment number 105 is an Editors' Pick
18th January 2012 - 10:12
and what about the light pollution caused by acres of glasshouses growing all our out of season fruit and veg? take a k
look at a night time satellie picture of europe and see what the major dutch growing area (but there are of cocurse many others) 'het westland' (near the hook of holland) throws into the night sky...
don/t waste! (and switch off unneeded lights IN the home too!!)
Link to this (Comment number 105)
Comment number 104.
chipichawa18th January 2012 - 10:07
Coincidently I came across this article a day after watching the trailer for the documentary The City Dark which seems to deal with the more philosophical issues surrounding our loss of the night sky.
Link to this (Comment number 104)
Comment number 103.
Gilbertonline18th January 2012 - 10:07
In the village I live there is no street lighting and never has been, you soon get use to taking a torch out with you whenever your out. With that said there are a couple of road junctions that would benefit from a little lighting.
The vast majority of roads don't need lighting and the lack of lighting can help in slowing traffic, as drivers tend to ease off when the have a restricted view.
Link to this (Comment number 103)
Comment number 102.
Lord Zakspade of Elbonia18th January 2012 - 10:11
No solution to this until we educate those who are too ignorant to care.
Ex-neighbour - security light pointing high up onto back of my house. When I asked him to lower it, his reply was it was high to protect me as well as him.
Personally I think he was too lazy to get up a ladder and point it lower.
My local authority took it seriously - it cost him a court appearance and fine.
Link to this (Comment number 102)
Comment number 101.
RememberScarborough18th January 2012 - 10:11
People are selfish so for every person who wants light polution reduced there will be another who will dispute this on the grounds of health and safety. I suspect it's cheaper for a council to leave the lights on than defend all the legal cases of people who've received bumps and bruises from not looking where they're going.
Link to this (Comment number 101)
Comment number 100.
MrShongComment number 100 is an Editors' Pick
18th January 2012 - 10:10
As someone who works in the street lighting industry. I know the public would never be given control of street lighting. since from experience, I know that even neighbours have different opinions about lights outside their own house. Let alone a whole area.
The control systems are there to improve energy efficiency and light output. Reducing and controlling where needed. But not just on a whim.
Link to this (Comment number 100)
Comment number 99.
qpw18th January 2012 - 10:08
I have a bright light outside my house such that I can see quite clearly in the bedroom with the lights out. Despite the parlous state of the road surfaces and the closing of libraries, council offices and other amenities, if said light ever fails there is someone round to repair it the morning of the next working day.
Link to this (Comment number 99)
Page 17 of 22