Viewpoint: Carers should fall silent after a patient's death
Surgeon and columnist Pauline Chen suggests doctors and nurses should be obliged to pause for silent reflection when someone they are treating dies. It would be good for them, she says, and may make them better carers.
On hospital wards, in the operating room, in clinics and in the intensive care unit, there should be a mandatory five-minute silence when a patient dies.
The doctors, nurses and all who had been caring for the patient at the end would gather around the bedside for those five minutes and reflect in silence on that patient's life and death.
In my experience, there's a moment right after the patient dies when most caregivers, particularly doctors, will scatter - if not in presence then in mind.
We immediately think about going to see the next patient, cleaning the room, getting the body ready to go to the mortuary. Anything to avoid confronting the reality before us because, for those of us who practise in wealthier countries, a patient who dies represents our professional failure.
“Start Quote
End QuoteOne reason we don't do a better job caring for the dying is that we hardly ever acknowledge our own responses to those who have died”
Several years ago, I took care of a young woman who had had a transplant a decade earlier but who was now hospitalised because of a series of infections.
She was slender and blonde, and I can recall how she loved talking about the novels she had read and the way she raised her right hand to her forehead, palm facing outward, to pat her hair.
But on the night she bled to death from an infection that had eroded into a major artery, none of us stopped to remember the lively conversations about literature.
Instead, as soon as she was pronounced dead, we became preoccupied with seeing the next patient, removing the stains from blood that had gushed up to the ceiling and disposing of the used needles and syringes strewn on her bed.
We did not talk about her, the woman who had just died in the room.
Weighed downI have often thought back to the fact that I did not stop to remember her or acknowledge her impact on me. There was no closure to our relationship, no acknowledgment of her life or my grief.
The Forum
- Dr Pauline Chen laid out her idea on The Forum, on the BBC World Service, and discussed it with literary editor Diane Athill and poet Paul Muldoon
- The Forum presents ideas from the world's biggest thinkers every week
- Broadcast on Saturday at 09:05, 22:05 and Sunday at 02:05 and 15:05
Had I lived those moments around her death differently, perhaps the details of her death would not be frozen in my mind as they are now, a few minutes replaying over and over again.
Perhaps by acknowledging her passing I would not be as weighed down by what was lost, even as I continued to care for other patients.
I believe that instituting the five-minute pause for silence after a patient dies will change the way doctors, nurses and other caregivers approach death.
First, it will give closure, as well as respect, to the relationship between that patient and his or her caregivers.
Second, the conscious pause, the act of taking time out, will establish a ritual. And rituals, consistently practised, offer great comfort at difficult moments.
Finally, the five-minute silence will allow caregivers to acknowledge their own feelings.
I am convinced that one of the reasons doctors and other healthcare providers don't do a better job caring for the dying is that we hardly ever take the time to acknowledge our own responses to those who have died. We deny those feelings only to end up constrained by them.
A five-minute pause for silence would allow us to attend to our own grief about a patient who has died and free us to commit ourselves fully to those who will follow.
Pauline Chen is a liver surgeon and author of Final Exam: A Surgeon's Reflection on Mortality. She also writes the Doctor and Patient column for the New York Times.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~17~RS~)

Breast cancer: What is the risk?
21 euphemisms that readers grew up with
The healing power of music
Hollande signs gay marriage bill
Sick art
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
Most wanted
Story of the S-Class
Fast Track
Comment number 7.
Tionisla25th October 2011 - 9:40
Having to face the reality of what it means when someone dies would be a terrible thing if it's something you see often. It might sound cold and harsh but it's probably best for the doctors and surgeons if they can divorce themselves from that and concentrate on the job. The last thing I'd want if I was under the knife is an emotional surgeon.
Link to this (Comment number 7)
Comment number 4.
Frank Cowell25th October 2011 - 8:54
Years ago, as a penniless student, I worked for a short time as a porter in an NHS hospital. One thing that I found hard to take was the flow of stupid disrespectful remarks by supposedly "caring" professionals -- "Ask them if I can have his breakfast"...
A brief silence sounds like a good idea.
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 3.
studentforever25th October 2011 - 8:20
Five minutes seems a bit excessive. A short, 30s or so, silence would seem appropriate. Then the senior person present could say some sort of short tribute, finishing with something like "... may you rest in peace and may those who loved you be comforted."
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 2.
Jack Kilms25th October 2011 - 8:09
To what end? These are finally tuned professionals there to help and learn from the living. In 66 my father learnt from the TB patients that kept dying from 'thin' that turned out to be aids, he learnt from the asbestos workers in 71, the steelworkers in 79 and the myriad of terminal patients that came to him over the years. He could learn while they lived but then it was all over, had to move on
Link to this (Comment number 2)