Trolling: Who does it and why?

 
Photos: Jade Goody (PA), Stephen Fry (BBC) and Miranda Hart Celebrities are often targets for abuse

An internet "troll" has been jailed for mocking dead teenagers on various websites. Public figures, including Stephen Fry and Miranda Hart, have also been victims of trolling. So what is it and why do people do it?

For some the word derives from a fishing term for towing bait behind a boat, for others it comes from the Norse monsters. But today trolling is more likely to involve a keyboard and mouse than a trawler, and if not a monster, it is a very modern menace.

Opponents might characterise it as the internet equivalent of road rage, vandalising a grave, or kicking a man when he's down.

Trolling is a phenomenon that has swept across websites in recent years. Online forums, Facebook pages and newspaper comment forms are bombarded with insults, provocations or threats. Supporters argue it's about humour, mischief and freedom of speech. But for many the ferocity and personal nature of the abuse verges on hate speech.

In its most extreme form it is a criminal offence. On Tuesday Sean Duffy was jailed for 18 weeks after posting offensive messages and videos on tribute pages about young people who had died. One of those he targeted was 15-year-old Natasha MacBryde, who had been killed by a train. "I fell asleep on the track lolz" was one of the messages he left on a Facebook page set up by her family.

High-profile cases

Natasha MacBryde
  • Natasha MacBryde - Sean Duffy was jailed for 18 weeks for posts on social networking sites about the 15-year-old after she took her own life
  • Hayley Bates - MP Karen Bradley raised trolling in Parliament after a Facebook page was set up mocking the 17-year-old's death in a car crash
  • Jade Goody - Colm Coss was jailed for 18 weeks after posting obscene messages on Facebook sites set up in memory of the Big Brother star and several other dead people

Duffy is the second person to be jailed for trolling in the UK. Last year Colm Coss was imprisoned for posting obscene messages on Facebook tribute sites, including that of Jade Goody.

Trolling appears to be part of an international phenomenon that includes cyberbullying. One of the first high-profile cases emerged in the US state of Missouri in 2006, when 13-year-old Megan Meier killed herself after being bullied online. The bully, Lori Drew, was a middle-aged neighbour who had set up a MySpace account to win - and later betray - her trust. Drew was acquitted of unauthorised computer use in 2009 due to concerns that a conviction would criminalise false online identities.

The First Amendment of the US Constitution protects free speech and makes it difficult to punish people who post offensive messages. But concern over internet vitriol is growing.

Facebook's former marketing director Randi Zuckerberg and Google head Eric Schmidt have both suggested anonymous posting should be phased out.

One of the difficulties is that trolling is a broad term, taking in everything from a cheeky provocation to violent threats. And why people do it continues to baffle the experts.

"Online people feel anonymous and disinhibited," says Prof Mark Griffiths, director of the International Gaming Research Unit at Nottingham Trent University. "They lower their emotional guard and in the heat of the moment may troll either reactively or proactively."

It is usually carried out by young adult males for amusement, boredom and revenge, he adds.

Arthur Cassidy, a social media psychologist, says young people's determination to create an online identity makes them vulnerable to trolling. Secrecy is jettisoned in favour of self-publicity on Facebook, opening the way for ridicule, jealousy and betrayal.

And the need to define themselves through their allegiance to certain celebrities creates a world in which the rich and famous become targets for personal abuse. As a result trolling is "virtually uncontrollable" until the government forces websites to clamp down, he says.

But it's not just young people. Scan any football, music or fan site and there are people of all ages taking part in the most vituperative attacks. But many of the theories that have been put forward as to why people do it don't stand up, says Tom Postnes, professor of social psychology at Groningen University in the Netherlands.

View from the internet forums

Will Brooks photo

Will Brooks on setting up Myfootballclub.co.uk

It was £35 to join MyFC so I don't think anyone joined with the intention of trolling. But disagreements on the forum all too easily turned to abuse. Finding out that respected professionals in their mid-fifties could post in that way was an eye opener. I've since discovered that forums have a habit of turning sour as it only takes a minority to skew them. As a format they've lost their innocence.

After researching "flaming" - the term for trolling in the early days of the internet - he rejects the idea that people "lose it" when online. If anything they become more attuned to social convention, albeit the specific conventions of the web. Provoking people appears to be the norm in some online communities, he says.

Most trolling is not criminal - it's about having a laugh, says Rob Manuel, co-founder of the website B3ta, which specialises in altering photographs for comic effect. "Trolling taps into people's desire to poke fun, make trouble and cause annoyance," he says.

He first became aware of the phenomenon in the 90s when a friend cross-posted on fan sites for Lord of the Rings and Star Wars, asking: "Who'd win in a fight - the Emperor or Gandalf?" Manuel says his friend sat back and laughed like some "mad scientist looking at insects in a jar" as hundreds of passionate posts followed.

'No guilt'

We're all capable of becoming a troll, says Jaron Lanier, a computer scientist in the US and author of You Are Not A Gadget. Lanier admits he has sometimes behaved badly online and believes the cloak of anonymity can encourage people to react in extreme ways.

"The temptation is there and we can get caught up in impulses. If someone reacts, it's emotional and it can be hard to get out of. We can all become trolls."

Randi Zuckerberg Former Facebook executive Zuckerberg says anonymous posting should be phased out

Twitter has given the public direct access to celebrities. And stars, including Stephen Fry and Miranda Hart, have temporarily left the website after coming under fire. Internet experts say the key is not to "feed the troll" by offering them a response. Comedian Dom Joly takes a different approach.

He describes himself as "troll slayer" and takes pleasure in tracking down the culprits and exposing them to public shame, especially from close family.

"There's something about a bully that really annoys me," he says. "They'll say something online that they'd never dare to say to your face."

The deviousness is "freaky". He discovered that one of those who'd threatened him was a 14-year-old girl with nine different online identities. They aren't always very intelligent about how they do it, he says.

The law

  • The Communications Act 2003 governs the internet, email, mobile phone calls and text messaging
  • Under section 127 of the act it is an offence to send messages that are "grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character"
  • The offence occurs whether those targeted actually receive the message or not

"One guy tweeted from his work account that he hoped my kids die of cancer. I let the MD of the firm know and the guy was fired. I felt no guilt, he should have gone to prison."

Some think regulation is needed, but trolling is not the internet's fault, says Jeff Jarvis, author of Public Parts. "The internet does not create special threats. It's a public square where people will be saying all sorts of things, some of them offensive."

The answer is for newspaper websites and online forums to employ sufficient moderators to prevent the comments spiralling into petty vendettas, he says. To ban online anonymity in order to prevent trolling would be to remove the right of whistleblowers and dissidents to get their message across, he adds.

Manuel agrees. "People are saying nasty, stupid things. So deal with it. Shutting down free speech and stamping on people's civil liberties is not a price worth paying."

 

More on This Story

In today's Magazine

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 552.

    540.AndyC555
    If someone makes the choice to say deliberately hurtful things on such a site, I think they deserve punishment."

    But, prison?

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 551.

    518. John McCormick

    we are bringing the internet into line with other, existing ways of being criminal."

    Bullying is rife in schools, in business, in the army, and on the internet. Why were none of the schoolgirls who allegedly bullied Natasha MacBryde into suicide ever charged or convicted, yet some loser is imprisoned because he upset the parents with his pathetic comments on the internet?

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 550.

    "520.smell the coffee

    One man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter."

    Thank you Captain Cliche but I'd hardly compare the struggle to overthrow a government with a person writing spiteful comments about someone who has died and who they don't know.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 549.

    People usually scream "hate speech" when they hear something they don't agree with, or like.

    Do you remember that homophobic church in America where they were allowed and the case against them dropped by the Judge who said they are legally protected, under the constitution, to be homophobic. (Which is true). So if that's the case, then racism should also be allowed. (Racist comments to others)

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 548.

    528.ekogaia
    Why say things anonymously that you would not say face to face? I think that if you are not prepared to say something to someone's face, then don't say it, just stow it."

    what about if you would if you could? case in point Jade Goody/Katie Price.
    there was a story a while back of a lad who got electrecuted stealing wire from around train tracks. I had an opinion on his IQ...

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 547.

    True, but that is why I suggested wishing his god/creater/devine cloner out of existence as well. Go for the source. Plus as Haruhi is god killing her would wipe out all existence. And well if that happened its at least a draw, a pyrrhic one mind

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 546.

    540. AndyC555 if by "a little bit" you mean "bears no resemblance" then yes, i agree

    i guess the modern IRL equivalent would be something like a drive by funeral service or "rent a grave".

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 545.

    Can a troll be counter trolled? Or could a 'troll trap' be devised?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 544.

    Yeah sure why not? Lets imprision 'Trolls' and while we're there lets fine spammers too, but why stop there? Lets ban the internet unlees people pass a 'morality test'. In fact lets just ban the internet period! You all happy now?

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 543.

    In America, freedom of speech allows you to say whatever the hell you want, about whatever you want. (In the UK there are restrictions). So, why is slander not allowed over there? Why isn't racism allowed? Because people twist the First Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States, or just make up stuff that you can't say this. Even when they are allowed.

    I've never understood this.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 542.

    539. i don't have a problem understanding you; this is an article about trolling

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 541.

    There's actually quite a difference between trolling and flaming. The flamewars on Usenet are legendary, and so are the trolls. While there is some overlap, to call flaming the early term for trolling is incorrect.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 540.

    My understanding is that these were tribute sites set up by relatives. As such they should have been respected. A bit like a book of rememberance set up in a church, or flowers left at the roadside for a crash victim.

    If someone makes the choice to say deliberately hurtful things on such a site, I think they deserve punishment.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 539.

    @ 533 MeatJustice

    Oh I see, it would seem you having problem understanding me. So will make it easy for you to understand me.
    What in my post made you think I have a short temper?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 538.

    Thanks, Barko at 532.
    It's offence, not offense.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 537.

    531.David H Parry
    4 Minutes ago
    Britain 2011
    Man types cruel words on website... prison!

    I think you may find it was a little more serious than that. It apparently hasn't been reported in full in this article

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 536.

    @Lesdyxic, umad?!?! come@me br0

    ^^ That is what you call a silly version of trolling. Most trolling are usually sarcastic, cheeky, rude and provocative comments.

    @Plath, I really care about what you're saying. Please tell me more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 535.

    522.I_am_I
    6 Minutes ago
    "its an open sewer into which anything goes"

    Best definition I have ever heard of the world wide web circa 2011

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 534.

    how can you effectively "police" comments on FB? "I'm gonna get ya" is both a vicious threat and a joking quip between friends. The BBC tries its feeble best to eliminate anything that might be remotely controversial by applying totally subjective and unexplained rules to contributors' comments. The result is a bland mush that doesnt provoke real insight or debate.

  • Comment number 533.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

 

Page 13 of 40

 

Features

  • NS Savannah, 1962Nuclear dream

    The ship that totally failed to change the world


  • Espresso cup7 days quiz

    Which city serves the strongest cup of coffee?


  • Glasgow 2014 quaichs and medalsQuaich guide

    What do the Scottish gifts given to Games medallists symbolise?


  • Malaysian plane wreckage in UkraineFlight risk

    How odd is it for three planes to crash in eight days?


  • israel flagDos and don'ts

    Can you criticise Israel without being anti-Semitic?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.