Can pub quizzes survive in the smartphone era?

Man using smartphone in pub

As pub closures increase, landlords are turning to traditional tools to attract trade, with giant chain Punch launching a national pub quiz to lure customers back. But since many quizzers have smartphones in their pockets, naming Mali's capital is less of a challenge than it once was. Question-setter Alan Connor looks at how to Google-proof a quiz.

Text-messaging Is Destroying the Pub Quiz As We Know It, noted the Super Furry Animals in 2001. Little did they know that the pub quiz of 2011 would start with the host insisting: "OK, iPhones away, please. Yes, very clever - and Androids. All phones away."

Cheating has always been possible in pub quizzes. But while once the dishonest quizzer had to pop out to phone a friend, or wait for a text message reply, phones with fast internet access have taken cheating possibilities to a new level.

So on the one hand, 24/7 access to information threatens to deal a deadly blow to the tradition of competitively recalling facts over a few pints. On the other, smartphones offer an opportunity to question-setters to come up with more inventive ways of testing drinkers' knowledge.

Some rounds are safe. The traditional A4 sheet with photos of well-known people can't be farmed out to the internet. But it's not feasible to base every round on colour printouts.

Others need to adapt. Playing extracts from pop songs risks competitors searching for the lyrics. Lyric rounds themselves are obviously out, along with naming titles or chart places.

Better to use instrumentals, perhaps - although services like Shazam allow the devious to have a remote server identify a track if their phone can "hear" 10 seconds of it. A truly secure music round might consist of "mash-ups" - two songs played or mixed together, or even of sheet music.

Sheet music

The challenge for quizmasters is to ask for things that computers don't - or can't - know. Machines can be better than any human at chess, for example, but are not so hot at cryptic crosswords.

So a smartphone-proof quiz might feature questions which can only be solved by making associations. For example, what connects a single by the Pogues, an Italian island resort and a unit of electrical current? (Answer in the box at the bottom.)

"The more you complicate a question, the more Google-proof it becomes," says Thomas Eaton, who sets questions for The Weakest Link. "You can set something up and then ask people to make elliptical connections - the kind of thing you get in Round Britain Quiz on Radio 4." Another example is the "What links…?" section of Eaton's weekly quiz in the Guardian.

Google-proof quiz

  • Which pop song is summarised thus: "A man stands in a severely dilapidated dwelling and realises he won't have the chance to do the necessary DIY before he dies"?
  • And: "In an area of low pressure and high humidity, a series of bodies falls from the sky at approximately 22:30"?
  • What connects... a single by the Pogues, an Italian island resort and a unit of electrical current?
  • Which film features dialogue which has been mistranslated as follows: "No Christ - this is an imp"?
  • And: "Thoroughfares? Where we shall be, we are not wanting thoroughfares"?
  • Which TV show begins as follows: "A man peruses a selection of leather-bound books, rejecting a couple, finally choosing one with a cheaper book hidden inside"?
  • And: "A bus causes an ironic wardrobe malfunction"?
  • Answers in the box below

One area where we humans still beat computers is grasping what information means. My quiz on Twitter, Just The Gist, summarises the stories of pop songs without any giveaway details. For example: "In an area of low pressure and high humidity, a series of bodies falls from the sky at approximately 22:30."

Similarly, it's possible to convey the sense of a quotation without any information a search engine recognises. Here is a line from a British film, translated online through a few languages and back to English: "No Christ. This is an imp."

Technology can be used against itself. Quizmasters can show a results page and have quizzers guess the search term.

The problem is that smartphones are constantly advancing. Until recently, I included some puzzles from newspapers in the sheets handed out to contestants during the break. "Sudoku used to be the safe haven of a clever quizmaster, but we've cracked that as well," says Stephen Rosenthal of Google, displaying an app where the user photographs a sudoku and a remote machine sends back a completed grid.

The same app, Google Goggles, can be used to identify the covers of CDs and books - but the quizmaster can stay one step ahead by blurring those images, leaving them recognisable to the human eye. Algorithms can't squint.

Pity the quizmaster, then, forced to ponder which kinds of information are understood better by humans than by computers - the same "Turing tests" that occupy the fine minds of those who work in artificial intelligence.

The final gambit available to the host is to stop cheating being worthwhile.

The answers

  • Pop songs: This Ole House, It's Raining Men
  • What connects: Ford cars (Fiesta, Capri, Ka)
  • Mistranslated movie lines: Life of Brian ("He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy"), Back to the Future ("Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads?")
  • Title sequences: Blackadder the Third, Sex and the City
  • Sheet music: Over the Rainbow

Some quizmasters include a round where the questions come in so fast, no-one's thumbs can keep up. It's possible to get 25 questions into two minutes this way; there's also the kind of round where the first team with a hand up and the right answer gets the points.

Other types of expertise can be tested - asking the contestants to draw a circle with an area of 20cm squared, say. And as far as we know, the senses of smell, taste and touch cannot be relayed over the internet, raising possibilities like "Identify the Brand of Crisp".

Why are quizmasters forced to go to these lengths to ensure fairness?

Victoria Coren of BBC Four's Only Connect is puzzled.

"Why would somebody go to a pub quiz, or launch a game of Scrabble, and then look up the answers on the sly? What meaning are they ascribing to the victory? There must be a massive national self-esteem problem."


More on This Story

In today's Magazine


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 27.

    I don't see the point of cheating on a quiz. Surely the point is to demonstrate who has the highest degree of general knowledge, not who can use a smart phone the best (or fastest). It would really annoy me to think that my brain (such as it is) was beaten by someone using a smart phone! If you want to win at a quiz, read the books, listen to the music, learn the facts - much more satisfactory!

  • rate this

    Comment number 23.

    The sheet music is a bit naughty, as the lyric there is not "Somewhere over the rainbow" but "Some day I'll wish upon a star; and wake up where the clouds are far behind me." Yes, I had to do a screen search to get that wording right!

  • rate this

    Comment number 22.

    Thinking about "The traditional A4 sheet with photos of well-known people can't be farmed out to the internet.", Google Goggles allows you to take a picture with an Android phone and it will attempt to identify it and return relavent pages, there's a similar iPhone program too (although the name escapes me) so even the picture round is not safe.

  • rate this

    Comment number 15.

    Stating "Ka" as the unit of electrical current is a bit misleading. The units are Amperes, commonly Amps for short (symbol A), and would only appear with a K if it was referring to kiloamperes which would be styled as kA not Ka. Then again perhaps I'm not popular at quizzes, I once argued with the quizmaster about the meaning of "c" in E=mc^2. He didn't have a master's in physics though.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Unfortunately several of the solutions here are already out of date. Deconvolution filters can make quick work of blurred images and clustering algorithms can solve "What links" questions more accurately than human players - indeed the longer the chain the more accurate they will be - something IBM used to great effect when one of their systems won a game of Jeopardy in the US recently.



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.