A Sliding Doors moment for the NHS?

 
Image from Sliding Doors

Sliding Doors is a film that strikes a chord with many people.

It alternates between two parallel universes based on the two paths the central character's life could take depending on whether or not she catches a train.

In chaos theory this is known as the butterfly effect, in which a small change at one place can result in large differences in a later state.

Life - as it was for Gwyneth Paltrow in the 1998 movie - is full of these "what if?" moments. The same is true for the NHS.

Take the debate about integrated care - or joined-up care as it is sometimes called. This is an unexciting word for what everyone agrees is one of the most pressing issues of our time.

As medicine has advanced and led to more life-saving treatment, an increasing amount of the NHS budget has come to be spent on long-term conditions.

Many of these are related to old age and involve managing illnesses such as diabetes, heart disease and respiratory problems.

This often requires coordinated care between the health and care sectors.

Start Quote

The current structures with local authorities, clinical commissioning groups and NHS England are so complex and fragmented that they will have to change”

End Quote Richard Humphries King's Fund

The problem is that one is free and provided by the NHS, while the other is means-tested and overseen by councils.

It means vulnerable people fall through the cracks as they are passed between the two.

'No big bang'

Both the government and Labour want this addressed.

Ministers are planning to launch the £3.8bn-a-year Better Care Fund next year off the back of 14 pilot schemes running this year looking at different ways of getting the two sectors to work together.

But that is small change - it doesn't even amount to 3% of the combined budgets for the two sectors.

This week saw the publication of the recommendations from a Labour-created independent commission led by Sir John Oldham, a GP and former Department of Health official.

Nye Bevan in 1948 Aneurin Bevan insisted local government should not be given responsibility for the NHS

But they attracted little attention, proposing even less - £10bn from the NHS over the course of the next Parliament - be set aside. Although to be fair to Sir John, he was working under tight parameters - no reorganisation and no extra money.

Yet behind the scenes all the main political parties have talked about biting the bullet and merging the budgets to ensure integrated care becomes a reality. So why has none gone further?

People from both sides of the political divide say there is simply no appetite for another major shake-up of the NHS. Or as one person put it to me: "Andrew Lansley's reforms have poisoned the well."

But this wasn't even integrated care's first Sliding Doors moment.

Prior to the creation of the NHS in 1948, three-quarters of hospital beds were run by councils.

But when Aneurin Bevan started drawing up plans for a national health service after World War Two, he decided they could not be trusted to run a system on such a grand scale. So he proposed the giant central structure that still largely exists today.

The decision prompted a series of rows with Deputy Prime Minister Herbert Morrison, but Bevan won the argument and the rest, as they say is, history.

The combination of the two moments means today the plans being put forward are arguably just tinkering around the edges.

Richard Humphries, the King's Fund's expert on integrated care, believes this is unsustainable.

"The current structures with local authorities, clinical commissioning groups and NHS England are so complex and fragmented that they will have to change," he says.

"This is the elephant in the room, but the changes will be evolutionary now. There will be no big bang."

 
Nick Triggle Article written by Nick Triggle Nick Triggle Health correspondent

Why the NHS is facing a tricky winter

The NHS is under strain – not just in A&E units but across the system as a whole from GP services to cancer and routine ops. A bad winter could spell trouble for patients and politicians alike, says Nick Triggle.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 141.

    18.p_richard stroker
    efficiency and consumer focus it has demonstrated with the railways and energy supply

    I take it this is irony (did anyone else think so?)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 140.

    Free at the point of delivery means that people don't value the care they get, don't bother to cancel unneeded appointments and use A&E inappropriately. If we had to pay a fee, recovered from mandatory insurance (not NI) then we might care a bit more and the NHS might be better funded. NB I was a health worker in Scotland from 1972 to last year.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 139.

    Would it not be simpler, to shoot people dead at age 65. How else is anyone goung to make a profit. All that is needed is broad availability of very cheap pain killers, large numbers of very poorly trained doctors and nurses to expand the current rubbish and the pensions crisis is solved. A young, fit healthy population will result and taxes are no longer needed. We can do away with taxes.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 138.

    Call me dave and obnoxious hunt are out to destroy the NHS so that their mates can move in and make a tidy profit for the companies that will makes these 2 wastes of space non exec directors when they get kicked out in May 2015

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 137.

    We need to build modern hospitals and change the footprint of Primary Care and integrate, through the same management channels, health and social care. We also need better school buildings, new social housing, newer prisons, better transport infrastructure...and many other things besides. But it costs.......

 

Comments 5 of 141

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.