PM rejects call to lower age of consent to 15
Prof John Ashton called for a national debate on lowering the age of consent
The prime minister has rejected a call from a leading expert on public health to lower the age of consent to 15.
Faculty of Public Health president Prof John Ashton said society had to accept that about a third of all boys and girls were having sex at 14 or 15.
He said the move would make it easier for 15-year-olds to get sexual health advice from the NHS.
Downing Street said the current age of 16 was in place to protect children and there were "no plans to change it".
Official figures suggest up to a third of teenagers have sex before the age of consent.
Age of consent
- Australia: 16 or 17 (depending on territory)
- Canada: 16
- Germany: 14
- Ireland: 17
- Italy: 14
- Romania: 18
- Sweden: 15
Prof Ashton said lowering the age by a year could "draw a line in the sand" against sex at 14 or younger.
'Recognise the facts'He said: "We need a debate here. It's time the adults started talking about the situation to take these enormous pressures off children and young people from becoming sexually active too early.
"Also to recognise the facts of what's going on by the age of 14 or 15 so that we can respond helpfully to them and support them on this journey into adult life."
He said lowering the age to 15 might make teachers and other people who work with teenagers "feel on a firmer footing" about telling them where to get advice on issues like contraception and disease.
Prof Ashton says society needs "open discussions in a sensible environment"
And he said in countries with a lower age of consent, young people got involved in sex at a later age and teenage pregnancy rates were lower.
"They are doing it and we need to be able to support them and protect them," he told the BBC's Breakfast.
"The negotiation of your first adult relationship in your mid-teens some time is something that will set the record for the rest of your life.
"At the moment youngsters are getting the most incredible messages from pornography, from social media. What we are seeing is more physical abuse and mental abuse in relationships."
“Start Quote
End Quote Nick Clegg Deputy Prime MinisterDo I think simply a blanket reduction in the age of consent is the answer to this difficult dilemma? No”
He said pornography was causing young people to have "strange expectations" of their relationships and this needed to be "corrected" by open discussion in a sensible environment.
He also called for more resources to go into sexual and relationships education in schools.
'Bombarded'Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said he was concerned about "high levels of teenage pregnancy" but he said lowering the age of consent was not the answer.
"I'm worried, like everybody's worried, about the sexualisation of the culture and the information that so many young people are bombarded with at the moment. That's why I do want see action," he told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show.
"I'm constantly urging (Education Secretary) Michael Gove and the Department for Education to update and modernise sex education in schools which hasn't kept up with the internet age.
"But do I think simply a blanket reduction in the age of consent is the answer to this difficult dilemma? No."
Luciana Berger, Labour's shadow public health minister, said the party opposed lowering the age of consent.
She said it was "not the way to tackle teenage pregnancy" and said the government had failed to support Labour amendments calling for mandatory sex and relationship education in schools.
The Faculty of Public Health, part of the Royal Colleges of Physicians, gives independent advice to the government.
'Legitimacy' warningDavid Tucker, head of policy at the NSPCC, said it would be prepared to engage in debate on the issue after considering Prof Ashton's arguments.
But Mr Tucker added: "Has there really been a significant change in the amount of young people having sex over the past 20 or 30 years? If it has changed, then is reducing the age of consent the most sensible way to deal with it?"
A lawyer for Jimmy Savile's victims warned against the change
A lawyer representing 72 of the victims of Jimmy Savile warned against any move to reduce the age of consent.
Liz Dux said: "Predatory adults would be given legitimacy to focus their attentions on even younger teenagers and there is a real risk that society would be sending out the message that sex between 14- to 15-year-olds is also acceptable."
A police report has said former TV presenter Savile, who died in 2011, was a "prolific, predatory sex offender".
The age of consent for sexual activity in the UK is 16.
In England and Wales, the age of sexual consent for women has been set at 16 since 1885, when campaigners fought to raise it from 13 to prevent child prostitution.
Other countries have set the legal age at anything from 12 to 20.
In 2001, the age of consent for gay men in England and Wales was reduced from 18 to 16, bringing it in line with heterosexuals for the first time. Lesbians, who until then faced no statutory age of consent, were also included in that legislation.
Scotland and Northern Ireland made 16 the age of consent for gay and straight men and women later that decade.


Experimental drug for UK Ebola nurse
New Year Honours
What got hot
100 things
Science in 2015
Window gazing
Comment number 129.
Phoenix17th November 2013 - 10:16
The age of consent is right at 16.
What should be discussed is legality of sexual intercourse under the age of consent between individuals of similar age (e.g. Switzerland) - I think this is a much better solution since it prevents criminalising minors as long as they have a consesual relationship. It also isn't a free pass for relations of someone over the age of consent with a minor.
Link to this (Comment number 129)
Comment number 122.
Lizzy17th November 2013 - 10:15
The idea of this age 16 law is to protect children, still of school age, not further education, from predatory individuals.
We risk too much by lowering the age limit and open the door to much more child exploitation.
Link to this (Comment number 122)
Comment number 121.
drcarol17th November 2013 - 10:14
It's a difficult area - some 16 years old are still very naïve, some are most definitely adult. The biggest problem is that there is no differentiation between 2 teenagers being sexually active, and exploitative relationships between teenagers and older adults. I don't think you can lower the age of consent until this can be sorted, without a loss of protection for more immature teens
Link to this (Comment number 121)
Comment number 100.
sja17th November 2013 - 10:05
I am a father and as all of us was young once. I personally feel that youngsters have always liked to break the rules not all youngsters but a percentage. Like smoke before the legal age, drink alcohol before the legal age and have sex before the legal age. If the age limit was lowered would this not just mean that more children would just start having sex at an even earlier age. Just a thought.
Link to this (Comment number 100)
Comment number 85.
Uncarved Block17th November 2013 - 10:06
The age of consent exists to stop adults taking advantage of immature young people. Young people develop at different rates but 16 seems about right to me. All of the issues mentioned for lowering the age of consent could be resolved if we just improved sex education. If we keep religion out of biology lessons then children will get all the information they need to protect their health.
Link to this (Comment number 85)
Comments 5 of 7