Uncertainty over children's heart surgery

two surgeons Every review into children's heart surgery has recommended fewer, bigger units

I still remember the 29 tiny black coffins - each with a white cross - laid out in front of the General Medical Council. That was 1998 and the start of the disciplinary hearing into failures of two surgeons at Bristol Royal Infirmary.

The Bristol heart scandal led to a wide-ranging inquiry which concluded in 2001 that dozens of babies had died needlessly. It recommended that children's heart surgery should be carried out in fewer specialist centres.

At least two further reviews - one by the Royal College of Surgeons in 2007 - backed that key proposal. The following year the "Safe and Sustainable" review was set up.

This was seen as a template for reconfiguring NHS services. Rather than ministers facing the unpopular task of shutting down units, the process of reorganisation would be left to an independent specialist group.

Five years on and more than £6m later and the review - the biggest of its kind in the NHS - has been suspended.

Start Quote

Given that all parties agree that fewer specialist centres will improve standards, then a new battle may commence in due course over the next plan to streamline services.”

End Quote

So what went wrong? The Independent Review Panel appointed by the Health Secretary to reassess the whole process concluded that the proposals to stop surgery at three hospitals in England - were flawed, leaving too many questions about sustainability unanswered.

In particular, the IRP review found that there was a lack of coordination with a review of adult heart services. The "single issue mission" of reducing the number of surgical centres has "ignored the impact on other specialist services."

This included the specialist respiratory service at the Royal Brompton. Ending children's heart surgery would have meant the closure of its paediatric intensive care unit.

The Royal Brompton is Europe's leading clinical and research centre for Cystic Fibrosis, and some complex cases where children may require access to intensive care would have had to be transferred elsewhere. Such knock-on effects were not fully assessed.

More travel

The need to travel further for surgery was a major concern among families in Yorkshire - whose surgical unit at Leeds was recommended to shut.

The IRP said the proposal put forward by Safe and Sustainable underestimated the number of times that families would have to travel to centres like Newcastle.

It said there would be a "disproportionate" impact on families in Yorkshire and the Humber in terms of increased travel times.

So what does this mean for the future? One thing has been made crystal clear by the IRP. It's review is "not a mandate for the status quo or going back over all the ground in the last five years. There is a case for change that commands wide understanding and support."

NHS England has until next month to decide what to do next. The IRP says that the review of children's services must be joined up with the review of adult cardiac care - something that the Safe and Sustainable review failed to do adequately.

So this is not the end of the matter. Given that all parties agree that fewer specialist centres will improve standards, then a new battle may commence in due course over the next plan to streamline services.

But the Health Secretary has made it clear that no change was no option.

He told the Commons: "There is overwhelming consensus that we cannot stick with the model of care we have now.

"To do so would be a betrayal of the families who lost loved ones in Bristol who want nothing more than the NHS to learn the lessons from their personal tragedies."

Fergus Walsh Article written by Fergus Walsh Fergus Walsh Medical correspondent

Defeating cancer, the 'evil genius'

Can we win the war against cancer? Over the past 18 months, Panorama has followed a group of patients on drug trials. Some who'd been given months to live, are keeping cancer at bay for years.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 31.

    So Hunt played his 'get out of jail' card. With political heavyweights, one partly responsible for Mid Staffs, breathing down his neck wanting 'their' hospitals to remain open at all costs, he was able to kick the can down the road. This problem has been known about for decades, as has been the solution. Unsafe surgery down the road or safe surgery in a centre of exellence, you choose.

  • rate this

    Comment number 30.

    If this episode does not finally inform everyone of the incompetence at many levels of the DoH, the NHS & parliament, then I dont know what will.
    Millions of useful pounds wasted, including one bit of health taking another bit to court is almost criminal.
    As stated in these responses, wheres this £ coming from?

    Is this deliberate prior to privatisation where it will all be "better" ? Be afraid!

  • rate this

    Comment number 29.

    People tell me that IRP is an "Independent Review Panel". A strange interpretation of independent for a panel where 13 of the 15 declare an interest in the matter under review and 14 are actually seem to be dependent on the NHS for a living.

  • rate this

    Comment number 28.

    Independant review panel was appointed by the Health secretary. . . . . . . . . . . . . I wonder which of these is qualified either as a doctor, surgeon, or parent to one of these poor suffering children?. . . . . or are they just qualified to choose which of these children lives or dies?

  • rate this

    Comment number 27.

    Isn't Fergus Walsh one of the BBC's very best Correspondents. I have watched him grow from short-trousers to a real gem of a reporter. Every article he writes or produces on BBC TV News is excellent. I cannot understand why a Blog today on the awful Gove and his GCSE plans has had 1000s of postings when the whole question of the welfare of our children by the NHS has been largely overlooked. Sad!


Comments 5 of 31



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.