Why ministers are walking an NHS tightrope

 
Man on tightrope The next few months could be crucial for the government in terms of the NHS

In his evidence to MPs, NHS chief executive Sir David Nicholson described the current moment in time as one of "maximum risk".

He was talking about the health service, but the term could equally be applied to the government.

It is easy to forget that just over a year ago ministers were fighting to save their health reforms - and perhaps even the coalition itself.

As Sir David pointed out as he was grilled by members of the Health Select Committee over his handling of the Stafford Hospital scandal, the coming weeks will see the whole structure of the health service redrawn.

More than 160 organisations will be abolished and another 200-plus will be created in their place, including the NHS Commissioning Board, which Sir David will run.

Come 1 April they will take charge of the health service in England with its budget in excess of £100bn and workforce of 1.3m.

Reorganisations on such a vast scale are never easy.

As Sir David testified on Tuesday, the risk is that as they happen - as in 2005-06 when he was in charge of the health authority that oversaw Stafford - eyes are taken off the ball.

In one of the more revealing exchanges, he said the system at the time had lost its focus as it juggled the task of merging organisations. Patients were not put first - and that had catastrophic consequences.

Back then the reform only involved halving the number of primary care trusts and health authorities.

This time round the upheaval is much greater.

Indispensable

Look no further than the furore over the past week over the regulations governing procurement in the NHS for proof of how distracting change can be.

Instead of focusing on patients and introducing the changes, doctors have been up in arms about what they saw as a breach of the carefully structured compromise that won them over back when ministers were trying to get their bill through Parliament.

In return for the profession's support - or at least not outright opposition - ministers provided assurances about the extent to which competition would be pursued.

The regulations are now being rewritten.

When they are put forward again, expect them to be gone through with a fine-tooth comb.

What this all illustrates is how toxic the reforms have become for the government.

But this is unlikely to be the end of it.

Ruth Thorlby, a senior researcher at the Nuffield Trust think tank, predicts the NHS will be a highly political issue for some time.

"The combination of the disorganisation caused by the upheaval and the money running out is destined to come together to create problems."

But it also explains why in many ways Sir David is indispensable despite the calls for him to go.

As one person who has worked with him at the Department of Health says: "He is the man the prime minister trusts to see through the changes."

When the controversy over the reforms were at their peak it was not Andrew Lansley who had a hotline to David Cameron, it was Sir David.

He has been leading the health service since 2006. He has experienced reorganisation, sorted out financial problems and his presence at the helm helped reassure those who work in the NHS that the government's health policy could work.

Without him, ministers fear they will slip from the tightrope they are walking.

 
Nick Triggle Article written by Nick Triggle Nick Triggle Health correspondent

Routine operations: Is a crisis brewing?

The A&E system has survived winter, but has the effort come at a price? Latest waiting time statistics for non-emergency hospital operations suggest it might.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -15

    Comment number 4.

    When I lived in the USA I funded an insurance industry and a health industry with my taxes/medical fees. Not only was it cheaper but the competition made the medical establishments compete on quality.

    I think it's clear that money is hosepiped away on our NHS out of control and something needs to be done to fix it.

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 36.

    @ 34 what did you do on the day the doctors went on strike? as someone that isnt a doctor and works in the private sector, i went to work on that day, brought money into the country (via my chicago based client) and paid a lot of tax to pay for your high salary and fat pension.

    not that much of a nightmare for you is it? when is the next strike by the way?

    the NHS serves itself only

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 40.

    @ 38

    the nhs has not worked properly for several decades, its no one parties fault. you cant have an organisation that employs 1m people soley as a public organisation, it clearly dosnt work.
    doctors are lazy and overpaid, they dont care and why should they, they are not held to account. the "managers" dont care and why should they, they get paid whatever they do, no accountability

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 80.

    Policy makers would do well to focus on funding above all else.At £112 billion a year the NHS remains as voraciously hungry for cash as ever,to the extent the entire national economy seems to exist to finance health and welfare.A bottomless pit for money,inefficient with a standing perpetuated by opportunist pressure groups that politicians are too frightened to question,let alone reform properly

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 46.

    @ 45

    typical for the NHS, "please go away, we dont want to treat you, we just want to do as little as possible for as much money as possible"
    hit the nail on the head there didnt you

    a private company would put profits first, but would lose those profits if it didnt provide a minimum service. as it stands now, there is no service, and no accoutability - the first one is the best of 2 evils

 

Comments 5 of 107

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.