Minimum alcohol price 'would save 11,500 pensioners'
Over-65s are more likely to drink every day and drink alone than younger drinkers
The deaths of 11,500 pensioners could be avoided over the next decade if minimum alcohol pricing is rolled out in England, according to new research.
The BBC's Panorama programme commissioned the research from statisticians at Sheffield University.
They examined the likely outcomes if Scotland's planned 50p per unit minimum price was applied in England.
It is estimated that 1.4m older people in Britain are drinking too much, leading to more hospital admissions.
Sarah Wadd, director of substance misuse and ageing research at the University of Bedfordshire, said: "We might be on a cusp of an epidemic of people drinking problematically in old age."
Drinking aloneScotland will become the first place in the UK to introduce minimum drink pricing and the coalition government has proposed a minimum price of 40p per unit of alcohol in England and Wales in an effort to "turn the tide" against binge drinking.
The plan is being challenged by the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) both at the European Commission and through the Scottish courts.
In England last year, there were more admissions to hospital of over-65s for alcohol-related injuries and illnesses than in the 16-24-year-old category.
Researchers say roughly one-third of older drinkers are thought to first develop their drink problem in later life.
Dr Richard Aspinall, a consultant hepatologist at Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth, said the amount people drank on their own at home could slowly creep up.
"We think of a very visible social disorder, consequences of young people binge drinking on a Saturday night in our town centres, but what is much more hidden is quiet, below-the-radar drinking at home."
Correction 28 September 2012: The main figure in this story has been amended from 50,000 to 11,500 after it emerged that there had been an error in the calculations carried out for Panorama by the School of Health and Related Research at the University of Sheffield.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~22~RS~)


Vitamin C can kill drug-resistant TB
US rescuers comb tornado-hit area
Striking a chord
Light relief
Law of the land
Under the hood
Comment number 225.
TuRbO-DD7th September 2012 - 15:38
If I want to get trashed on a bottle of vodka at £10.... £15 or £20 will not stop me.....
Of course it will not reduce drinking, it will just cost more.... MORONS!
Link to this (Comment number 225)
Comment number 114.
Philip C7th September 2012 - 12:35
I was in Spain recently and bottles of wine at the supermarket were less than 1.50 euros. Spain doesn't suffer from binge drinking among it's youth or it's elderly because thats not part of the culture. Plus they still respect the elderly so they dont need to feel lonely like some pensioners here. Raising tax wont solve the problem. Changing the culture will but that requires a long term project.
Link to this (Comment number 114)
Comment number 54.
Under-Used7th September 2012 - 11:25
The increasing propensity of the state to attempt direct manipulation of people's behaviour is a worrying trend. That it uses financial penalties to achieve its goals demonstrates a certain disdain for low income individuals who are powerless to react - unlike those with means. The state's behaviour will lead to an erosion of individual autonomy and a sterilisation of the joys of life.
Link to this (Comment number 54)
Comment number 51.
Ingvar_Gunnarsson7th September 2012 - 11:19
Yet another attack on the working classes. The 'let's protect people from themselves' mentality has just got to stop. Setting tariffs on alcohol only means the industry will go underground, with cheaper stuff being sold on the black market which would no doubt be far more dangerous than branded alcohol. Stop taxing the hell out of us and let us spend our money how we wish.
Link to this (Comment number 51)
Comment number 47.
eConundrum7th September 2012 - 11:13
I believe in individual responsibility It’s up to the individual to weigh the cost of their actions and decide what they put in their body, not the role of the government or it shouldn’t be. Government should make sure people are informed of the consequences of their actions and leave it at that. I speak as someone who hardly drinks and won’t be effected.
Link to this (Comment number 47)
Comments 5 of 7