Flu vaccines for all children

 
Girl being given flu vaccine nasally Nasally introduced flu vaccine

Related Stories

All two to 17-year-olds in the UK are to be offered annual flu vaccinations.

If 30% take up the offer, there will be 11,000 fewer hospitalisations and 2,000 fewer deaths each year, the chief medical officer for England says.

The children will be immunised using a nasal spray rather than an injection, starting in 2014 at the earliest.

The injectable flu vaccine will continue to be offered to the over-65s, pregnant women and those with medical conditions such as asthma.

Children usually get a mild and sometimes unpleasant illness from seasonal flu. They rarely suffer complications. Youngsters who do are usually in the at-risk groups already offered a flu vaccine.

Prof Dame Sally Davies: "This should result in 11,000 fewer hospitalisations and 2,000 fewer deaths each year"

The Joint Committe on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) said the new strategy would avert a large number of flu cases among children as well as many severe cases and deaths, mostly among the elderly and others vulnerable to the infection.

Chief medical officer for England, Prof Dame Sally Davies, told me: "Even with moderate uptake of 30% it's estimated that this should result in 11,000 fewer hospitalisations and 2,000 fewer deaths each year.

"But we will aim to get a much higher proportion of children immunised and that will save even more lives."

Those figures are based on an unpublished study from the Health Protection Agency and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Parents

Prof Davies said most of the details of the immunisation programme had still to be worked out, including negotiating a contract price for the vaccine, which is marketed by AstraZeneca.

The Department of Health said the company would not have the capacity to deliver enough vaccine until 2014 at the earliest.

Fluenz is a live attenuated - weakened - intranasal vaccine, which has been used for several years in the United States under the brand name FluMist.

In the minutes of its latest meeting the JCVI says the vaccine has "a good safety profile" and may be more widely accepted by parents and children because it is given in the form of a nasal spray.

But side effects can include mild flu-like symptoms, including a runny nose or sore throat.

Prof Adam Finn, consultant in paediatric infectious diseases at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, said: "This is a good idea as we know it's effective and safe and flu can be a serious illness in childhood, not just in old age.

"There should be time to do some more research before we introduce the vaccine to help us predict how well such a programme would be accepted and would work."

The expectation is that under-fives will be vaccinated in GP surgeries and older children at school, but the JCVI says there are currently "far too few" school nurses to enable this to happen.

The committee also said it would be a "huge expansion" of the immunisation programme, more than doubling the number of vaccinations offered to children before they reach adulthood.

Nine million children will be eligible for the nasal flu vaccine and the price tag could be more than £100m a year.

Children under nine are likely to require two doses of the vaccine spaced a few weeks apart, with older children needing one dose.

The UK is thought to be the first country in the world to offer free flu immunisation to all children. Like all other vaccines here it will not be compulsory.

Herd immunity

The JCVI says there may be "mixed reactions" to the flu immunisation plans and it recommends an information campaign for parents, children and healthcare staff.

All immunisation is intended to benefit the wider population as well as the individual through what is known as herd immunity. There are already examples where the benefit is largely for others.

All children are immunised against rubella (also known as German measles). The virus causes only a mild infection in children. But if a woman catches the infection during early pregnancy it can cause serious damage to the developing baby.

By immunising all children against rubella, it provides protection to others, as yet unborn.

In the same way, extending flu vaccination to healthy children will provide most health benefits to others.

Prof Davies said healthy children would get real benefits from avoiding flu, which could be a "miserable" disease.

She added: "Don't forget it will also protect their baby brother or sister, and their grand-parents, so it really is worth doing."

 
Fergus Walsh Article written by Fergus Walsh Fergus Walsh Medical correspondent

Ebola trial suggests vaccine is safe

The first results of an experimental Ebola vaccine being tested in Oxford suggest it is safe.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -34

    Comment number 13.

    This is horrendous. Obviously someone is starting to develop a surplus of mercury and this is the best way they can think of to get rid of it all. This is more dangerous than actually coming down with the flu!

    Only the gullible will fall for this. But then that's all it takes to make someone a lot of money.

  • rate this
    -25

    Comment number 14.

    Waste of money and time. There is no way I will subject my children to these unnecessary vaccinations. They have had flu before and have recovered fine - let their immune systems develop naturally!

  • rate this
    -22

    Comment number 10.

    This seems stupid. What happens when they turn 18 and get flu for the first time? Flu is not in the same league as other illnesses that require vaccination. For most people, seasonal flu is just a normal part of life and children should get use to it.

  • rate this
    -22

    Comment number 145.

    If my children get a flu shot at school I will sue them, the vaccines are far worse than the flu, its all about making the governments corporate backers money. They will risk your childs health with mercury filled untested vaccines that have dubious results at best just to satisfy there corporate masters. The banks own all the pharmaceutical & insurance companys and they also own the government

  • rate this
    -21

    Comment number 165.

    What I find hilarious about all the homoeopathic sceptics is they have never studied and practised it , those who have made the effort use it effectively.

    Evaluations by scientists are invalid and worthless as they do not study and practise the art and science of homoeopathy, in short it is like a plumber trying to evaluate sophisticated electronics, the key is down to the motives of the testers.

 

Comments 5 of 511

 

Features

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.