Global weight gain more damaging than rising numbers

 
World made of hot dogs and sweets Extra weight could be the equivalent of adding an extra billion people to the planet.

Related Stories

Researchers say if increasing levels of fatness are replicated globally it could mean the equivalent of an extra billion people on the planet.

The team estimated the total weight of people on the planet and found that North America had the highest average.

Although only 6% of the global population live there, it is responsible for more than a third of the obesity.

The research is published in the journal BMC Public Health.

In their report, the researchers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine calculate the weight of the global population at 287 million tonnes. They estimate that 15 million tonnes of this mass is due to people being overweight, and 3.5 million tonnes due to obesity.

Using World Health Organization data from 2005, the scientists worked out that the average global body weight was 62kg (137lb). But there were huge regional differences. In North America, the average was 80.7kg (178lb), while in Asia it was 57.7kg (127lb) .

Start Quote

One of the problems with definitions of obesity - it fosters a them and us ideal - when actually we're all getting fatter”

End Quote Prof Ian Roberts London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

While Asia accounts for 61% of the global population, it only accounts for 13% of the weight of the world due to obesity.

One of the authors of the paper, Prof Ian Roberts, explained the thinking behind the calculation.

"When people think about environmental sustainability, they immediately focus on population. Actually, when it comes down to it - it's not how many mouths there are to feed, it's how much flesh there is on the planet."

Weight of the world

The researchers say that just focusing on obesity in individuals or in groups is divisive and unhelpful.

"One of the problems with definitions of obesity is that it fosters a 'them and us' ideal. Actually, we're all getting fatter." Prof Roberts told BBC News.

The scientists also compiled tables of the heaviest and lightest countries according to their estimates.

The US, with its well documented problems with weight, is top of the list. If the rest of the world were to emulate the Americans, Prof Roberts says, it would have dramatic implications for the planet.

Thin Asian lady Japanese people have a low average BMI but high standards of living.

"If every country in the world had the same level of fatness that we see in the USA, in weight terms that would be like an extra billion people of world average body mass," he explained.

While countries like Eritrea, Vietnam and Ethiopia are at the other end of the scale from the US, the researchers argue it is not sufficient to say that being skinny is just a factor of poverty. The researchers point to a country like Japan which, according to Professor Roberts, could be a model for others.

"The Japanese example is quite strong. Average BMI (Body Mass Index) in USA in 2005 was 28.7. In Japan, it was 22. You can be lean without being really poor, and Japan seems to have pulled that off."

Car culture

But other countries in the top 10 most weighty are more of a surprise, and include Kuwait, Croatia, Qatar and Egypt.

Prof Roberts says that the high number of Arab countries is due to the impact of the automobile.

"One of the most important determinants of average body mass index is motor vehicle gas consumption per capita. So, it is no surprise to see many of the Arab countries in the list - people eat but they move very little because they drive everywhere."

The research team hopes its work will prompt new thinking about how the world weighs up issues of consumption, weight and population growth.

"We often point the finger at poor women in Africa having too many babies," says Prof Roberts. "But we've also got to think of this fatness thing; it's part of the same issue of exceeding our planetary limits."

How much is the world over-eating?

No. of extra adults that could be fed with food eaten by:
Country Pop. Overweight Obese

World

4,629m

111m

23m

Top 10 over-eaters

United States

236m

22m

8m

Russian Federation

122m

5m

1m

Egypt

50m

4m

1m

Mexico

73m

4m

1m

Germany

71m

4m

0.9m

Brazil

135m

4m

0.7m

United Kingdom

49m

3m

0.7m

Argentina

28m

2m

0.6m

Turkey

49m

2m

0.5m

Iran

52m

2m

0.4m

Bottom 10 over-eaters

Brunei

0.3m

3,824

363

Sri Lanka

15m

27,546

336

Guinea-Bissau

0.8m

4,832

310

The Gambia

0.8m

5,978

296

Central African Republic

2m

8,595

245

Cambodia

8m

23,857

155

East Timor

0.5m

2,539

146

Bhutan

0.4m

1,560

75

Sao Tome and Principe

0.9m

781

62

Eritrea

3m

2,005

12

Population source: WHO data 2005

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 368.

    This is a poorly thought through article. All it is really saying is that one subsection of the population is using more resources.

    You could just as easily say that "Countries with the highest levels of car ownership are using most of the fuel"

    "People with more electronic gadgets use more power"

    "Populations who keep pets are using more of the worlds food resources".

    Ride a bike, stay thin.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 304.

    But there's a hell of a lot of fat people that aren't over-eaters at all. Yet there are thin people that eat and eat and eat but don't gain weight. See how flawed the weight/BMI argument is? Resources aren't solely being used by the bigger people.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 299.

    To me it has always been clear - the population growth problem is a myth. The real issue is how much resources each individual consumes.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 241.

    Not a flawed arguement, but rather one that misses the logical conclusion to ther own thesis.

    The problem is the excessive amount of total "Human Activity" and that is (Individual Impact) x (number of individuals)

    You can bust the limits either with a large number of low impact individuals, or a small number of high impact individuals

    - and yes; people who can eat more . . . have more impact !

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 125.

    So much for the myth of there being too many people in the world, there's just too many selfish people gobbling up all the resources

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

More Health stories

RSS

Features

  • Man's hands putting ring on woman's fingerName changer

    Why do wives take a man's name after marriage?


  • Mobil canopies on the A6 at Red Hill, LeicestershireEnglish heritage

    Zebra crossings to bus stations: unusual listed buildings


  • Man with typewriterLove to Patrick

    The official whose over-familiar letters infuriated his boss


  • GoFig india violenceGo Figure

    The week in numbers with our Go Figure images


  • Arlene Phillips Top 10 tips

    How to be a successful choreographer


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.