Consultation launched on how to label food

 
Food label The traffic light system labels less health foods red

Related Stories

Food manufacturers, supermarkets and health experts are to be asked their views on the best way to label the nutritional content of food.

There have been long-running battles over how to label the amount of fat, sugar, salt and calories in food - with several different systems in place.

The government's UK-wide consultation will take place over the next 12 weeks.

The health secretary, Andrew Lansley, said getting everyone to use the same system was "common sense".

He said this made it easier for people to make a healthier choice when they were buying food.

Some retailers and manufactures have preferred a "traffic light" system in which the least healthy foods are labelled red and the most healthy are in green.

Others use Guideline Daily Amounts - or GDAs - which give the percentage of recommended intake. Some use both.

'Consistent approach'

European regulations, which were agreed at the end of last year, said nutritional information must be labelled either per portion or per 100g.

Mr Lansley told the BBC it was "not possible" for him or other health ministers to "impose a solution other than the EU solution".

However, he said he was keen to work with businesses to find a "consistent" approach which could be introduced voluntarily across the UK.

He suggested that combining both the traffic light and GDA systems could help consumers.

Start Quote

We're great fans of traffic lights, the simpler the better”

End Quote Dr Vivienne Nathanson British Medical Association

He said he was aiming for a system which "incorporates not only what Europe requires in terms of recommended daily allowance for calories and sugar and salt and saturated fats, but in addition to that to give a means by which consumers can look at a glance, for example, using things like colour coding."

Dr Vivienne Nathanson, head of science and ethics at the British Medical Association, told the BBC: "We're great fans of traffic lights, the simpler the better."

But she said the ideal would be to have the colour coding as well as the more detailed GDAs.

Dr Nathanson said everyone using the same system would be "enormously" helpful as people were put off by "having to adjust to a different label every time you look at a different food".

Julia Waltham, from the British Heart Foundation, said: "This isn't about telling people what should or shouldn't be in their baskets.

"The government should strongly recommend that food companies and supermarkets use a consistent food labelling scheme that includes traffic light colours. They all have a responsibility to provide a system that helps shoppers compare products and then easily pick the healthiest option if they want to."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 248.

    Grams and percentage of Recommended daily intake is probably the best system. With Colour coding for high and Low rather than for Safety-Danger. Its not avoiding salt and fat completely because is dangerous. Its only dangerous if you have too much. Its also a problem if you have too little salt and unsaturated fat. It isn't really confusing. Most people dont need smiley faces and traffic lights.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 93.

    Traffic light system is good in my opinion makes it easy to spot a packet with all green on it from a fridge or shelf full of food. You can then check it for the more detailed information like GDA etc to see if it matches what you want. My main concern is who decides what is in this food, who measures it and who checks it and how accurate is it? if its wrong what is the point of the label.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 92.

    I can't see a new labelling system changing peoples shopping and eating habits.

    As far as ready meals are concerned, put VAT on foods whichg are "amber" and "red" and then send the extra VAT to the NHS, because that's where the extra money is needed.

  • rate this
    +52

    Comment number 54.

    I grew up in the 60s. there was none of this rubbish and there was not that many overweight people. we walked to school, people also walked or cycled to work . you can put as many labels on food as you want if people go everywhere by car and kids have to driven a few metres to school its no wonder we are getting fatter.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 49.

    As a colour blind person may I suggest, once a decision is made, the government does not use red and green as the two main colours.

    Blue and yellow could be seen my everyone or even better Black and White which would also save on the cost of labelling for small firms. In addition place GDA's on top of the Black or White vector. Black is bad, White is good.

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

More Health stories

RSS

Features

  • Shiny bootsMarching orders

    Where does the phrase 'boots on the ground' come from?


  • Almaz cleaning floorAlmaz's prison

    Beaten and raped - the story of an African servant in Saudi Arabia


  • Train drawn by Jonathan Backhouse, 1825The first trainspotter

    Did this drawing mark the start of a misunderstood hobby?


  • MarijuanaHigh tech

    The start-ups hoping to transform the marijuana industry


  • Child eating ice creamTooth top tips

    Experts on ways to encourage children to look after their teeth


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.