NHS Confederation: Hospital-based care 'must change'
Andrew Lansley: "It's not about moving people out of hospitals, it's about giving them the best possible care"
The NHS in England must end the "hospital-or-bust" attitude to medical care, says the body representing health service trusts.
At least one in four patients would be better off being treated by NHS staff at home, figures suggest.
2012 will be a key year for the NHS as it tries to make £20bn in efficiency savings by 2015, according to the head of the NHS Confederation, Mike Farrar.
Ministers say modernising the NHS will safeguard its future.
Mr Farrar said: "Hospitals play a vital role but we do rely on them for some services which could be provided elsewhere.
"We should be concentrating on reducing hospital stays where this is right for patients, shifting resources into community services, raising standards of general practice, and promoting early intervention and self-care.
“Start Quote
End Quote Steve Field NHS Future ForumThe old hospital-based system has to develop into a more preventative, community-based system”
"There is a value-for-money argument for doing this, but it is not just about money and the public need to be told that - this is about building an NHS for the future."
Mr Farrar said the required changes included treating frail people in their homes, and minimising hospital stays wherever possible.
Politicians and NHS leaders must show the public how these changes could improve care, rather than focusing on fears over the closure of hospital services, he added.
"Many of our hospitals know that the patients that they are treating in their beds on any given day could be treated better - with better outcomes for them and their families - if they were treated outside of hospitals in community or primary care," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
'Place of default'Mr Farrar told Today that people had become used to "the hospital being a place of default" and that primary and community healthcare services had sometimes been under-funded.
Mike Farrar, NHS Confederation: "It's much better for a good number of patients to be cared for in their homes"
But he said even where clinicians knew that better care could be provided outside of hospitals, and politicians accepted this privately, the public debate had not helped individuals understand that.
"We need the politicians and the clinicians to stand together with one voice to explain these changes," he said.
"I think the time has come for real political courage on all parties to stand up and say 'if the evidence is clear that my constituents will get better outcomes because they travel a bit further' or indeed that 'if we can release the costs of these beds to make services available in your own homes' - then that's the right thing to do."
Commenting on the new year message from the NHS Confederation, Health Minister Simon Burns said in a statement: "Modernising the NHS will both safeguard the future of our health service, and will deliver a world-class service that puts patients at the heart of everything it does."
The chair of the independent NHS Future Forum, Steve Field, said: "The old hospital-based system has to develop into a more preventative, community-based system."
And shadow health minister Liz Kendall added there would be "difficult decisions" that had to made.
"The NHS Confederation is right to say this will require real leadership from the NHS and politicians."
But she questioned whether the government would be able to provide this as it was embarking on a major reorganisation of NHS structures.
~RS~q~RS~postId=111288332~RS~z~RS~07~RS~)


Neuron growth 'cuts memory space'
Two rockets hit southern Beirut
Radical errors
Smarter future
History's shadow
Spinal trauma
Click
Comment number 163.
ithom29th December 2011 - 9:48
Yet another bureaucratic body purporting to know whats best for us. They may be right but why should we believe them? Their members the trusts have added layer upon layer of management whilst overseeing reductions in numbers of qualified doctors & nurses. I smell a very large expensive rat!
Link to this (Comment number 163)
Comment number 162.
stuart29th December 2011 - 9:46
What part of the community are we sending people to instead? The chip shop? Is there an anaethetist in Halfords? 49% - is the logic that's less than 50% so we can't claim a privatisation? It's a stitch up. Where I grew up its usually the community that put you in hospital. A Tory government seeks to sell off assets every time. This tenure it includes the trees.
Link to this (Comment number 162)
Comment number 161.
Frank Lund29th December 2011 - 9:46
The most constant factor is major change.
"We want BIG hospitals not little cottage hospitals"
THEN
"Let's turn doctors' surgeries into mini hospitals"
Link to this (Comment number 161)
Comment number 160.
cuileanComment number 160 is an Editors' Pick
29th December 2011 - 9:46
As long as the selfish British public can't be bothered looking after their own relatives and see hospitals as convenient granny-dumping centres, there is absolutely no way this would work.
Link to this (Comment number 160)
Comment number 159.
Roger Ivan Hart29th December 2011 - 9:44
My daughter had a mastectomy yesterday. After one night in hospital she's going home today. She'll receive visits from a nurse each day until the drains come out and plenty of family and friends around to help with her children so that her husband can get back to work. We need to reestablish close and extended family and friend support and totally reject the Thatcherite view of a selfish society.
Link to this (Comment number 159)
Comment number 158.
MilimaniComment number 158 is an Editors' Pick
29th December 2011 - 9:44
There can not be a perfect solution. Not every family can care for a sick person full time, often due to them working. Hospital care may not be a perfect, yet in some cases it does free relatives to be able to work.
Outsoucing care too has a major downside, my wife has done that for years. 15 mins twice a day, can hardly be called acceptable if you apply some form of dignity to the patient.
Link to this (Comment number 158)
Comment number 157.
Blandings castle29th December 2011 - 9:43
As usual the NHS Confederation picks up on trends after the event. Most NHS bodies are desperately trying to reconfigure services to be more community based. You could legitimately argue that the failing was to do this when money was available. Much harder when there are £20bn of cuts to implement and a mad cap re-organisation costing millions fracturing the NHS.
Link to this (Comment number 157)
Comment number 156.
marieComment number 156 is an Editors' Pick
29th December 2011 - 9:42
I saw too many patients I nursed(often elderly or with pre-existing health conditions) kept in hospital too long because no one to care for them at home/wider community. This wasn't great for them but also blocked an acute bed for someone else.In recent years the pendulum's swung too far the other way;too many patients discharged without adequate support. More community based care can only help.
Link to this (Comment number 156)
Comment number 155.
Bigry29th December 2011 - 9:41
@136. paulmerhaba
I apologise, I thought you were commenting on the fact that a gardener has got above his station.
Link to this (Comment number 155)
Comment number 154.
lynne29th December 2011 - 9:36
i feel if you place elderly people at home with primary care then it would be a loneley existance for them as many dont have families anymore and a 15 minute visit from someone who only have time to serve a meal is not right most elderly carnt afford to have a fire for heating we have to remember these people fought for this country and worked all there lives and primary care doesnt come cheap
Link to this (Comment number 154)
Comment number 153.
CHRIS G29th December 2011 - 9:35
It' s a lovely idea. I am about to go to my mother' s care home to observe a Psychiatric nurse assess her for the first time since she entered this system. (over 2 years). This is a requirement for the dangerous chemical coshes that are used to suppress her behaviour. She is expected to pay for this lack of attention because she does not have primary needs. Nor will many who stay at home.
Link to this (Comment number 153)
Comment number 152.
MaggieCM29th December 2011 - 9:34
In theory this is great, however in practice I suspect, from experience, it will just another excuse to dump care onto relatives and carers and the relevent professionals to run away as quickly as possible and abandon untrained but caring people to try and cope with situations beyond their experience and capabilities.
Link to this (Comment number 152)
Comment number 151.
sophie29th December 2011 - 9:30
not sure about this one. is it just for saving money?
Link to this (Comment number 151)
Comment number 150.
rd657ep29th December 2011 - 9:25
Here we go again we are living to long.
why attack the vulnerable we cant strike we have no voice.
Perhaps -G.P. Practices with more than 5 Doctors had 3 Doctors with Specialist Knowledge in 1.E.N.T.
2. Chest. 3.Dermatology.This might lower Referals to Hospitals.
Eyes can be tested by a visit to the Opticians.
For ordinary G.P. know a little about a Lot & Specialists a lot about a little.
Link to this (Comment number 150)
Comment number 149.
Tinytillytwo29th December 2011 - 9:25
I have worked as a trained member of staff in a community hospital, for 20yrs, and have experienced many trends come and go. What is fact, and occurs on a regular basis, are relatives who drag their heels (weeks!) when asked to choose a nursing home placement for their nearest and dearest. They cause delayed discharges, the patients becomes "institutionalised" and are usually self-funding. Hmmmm!
Link to this (Comment number 149)
Comment number 148.
whycanti29th December 2011 - 9:36
MIL recently discharged unable to walk safely and with drugs written up 3x what they should have been with rehab service refused as 'unable to provide'.
We can spend a whole day off work, arranging and travelling to a clinic for a follow-up to see a Consultant who hasn't got the notes and didn't know about readmission to hospital. Whole family involved - and you're blaming us for not caring???
Link to this (Comment number 148)
Comment number 147.
paul29th December 2011 - 9:35
It's impotant to free up hospital beds so the 49% of private beds become available. I don't see why Smythington-Smythe should have to wait for a mole to be removed or his wife to have a facelift just because people with serious conditions who need treatment selfishly clog up the beds. Ship em off home and let em wait. Just send someone round now and then to keep em calm. (Sarcasm!)
Link to this (Comment number 147)
Comment number 146.
Tig29th December 2011 - 9:35
A nice idea, but this government have already cut funding for local services and reduced some of the support this would need to really work.
As it stands, this looks like the old 'care in the community' scheme, where people with mental health problems were sent out of hospitals into communities that had no systems and no money to cope. Many of them ended up on the streets or in prison instead.
Link to this (Comment number 146)
Comment number 145.
richard429th December 2011 - 9:32
What with all the cuts to staff in the NHS, what with all the cuts in Council works. Who is going to look after all these patients in there "homes", maybe when the goverment make alot more unemployed, people will then have the time, and claim benifits, to look after them. Wait, benifit cuts, I know get Mr Osbourne to cut ANOTHER 100 pounds off winter fuel allowance, few more old will die sooner.
Link to this (Comment number 145)
Comment number 144.
stevie29th December 2011 - 9:31
Just like care of the elderly this is probably going to be backdoor privatisation. What will start off as NHS care at home, will swiftly move to poor care provided by profit making companies like those taking over the care of the elderly today. This care will gradually become two tier as the basic service will be paid for by the NHS budget with charges for improved care paid by the recipient.
Link to this (Comment number 144)
Page 24 of 32