bbc.co.uk navigation

Care for high-risk surgery 'falling short'

 
Surgical team at work The review team looked at care given to nearly 20,000 patients across 300 hospitals

Related Stories

The care given to high-risk surgery patients is falling short of acceptable standards, an independent review says.

The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death found four in 10 got poor or inadequate treatment.

The expert panel described the findings as "disturbing" after reviewing nearly 20,000 patients in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

In particular, it highlighted a lack of pre-op checks and insufficient use of critical care facilities after surgery.

Those designated as high-risk patients tend to be drawn from groups who have a number of other health conditions, such as diabetes and heart disease; age and weight are also factors.

Death risk

They are estimated to make up about 10% of the surgical workload, but 80% of deaths.

Of the 20,000 cases looked at by the review team across 300 hospitals, nearly 4,000 involved high-risk patients having either emergency or elective surgery.

Of these, they carried out in-depth reviews on 829.

Over all, the team judged the care in 43% of cases to be poor or inadequate. Of the rest, 48% got good care and for 9% there was insufficient data to make a proper assessment.

Start Quote

The NHS needs to be far more open and transparent about the risks patients are exposed to”

End Quote Katherine Murphy Patients Association

Where care was not up to scratch there were some common themes, the report said.

A fifth whose surgery was planned were not seen in a pre-assessment clinic, which led to higher death rates among this group.

And only 22% of high-risk patients were sent to critical care following surgery. The rest were sent to other wards and, where the experts believed this was the wrong decision, there was a death rate more than three times higher

Experts also found patients were not being told about their risk of death, with fewer than a tenth of high-risk patients having their estimated risk put in their notes.

In conclusion, the report recommended introducing a nationwide system for identifying patients who are at high-risk of dying or suffering complications after surgery.

It also called for all high-risk patients to be seen and "fully investigated" in pre-assessment clinics.

Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, described the report as "shocking".

"The NHS needs to be far more open and transparent about the risks patients are exposed to," she said.

NHS medical director Prof Sir Bruce Keogh said: "The vast majority of operations performed by the NHS are safe and successful, but all patients, especially those at high risk, should receive good care and all the information that they need about their treatment - anything less is simply unacceptable."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 19.

    I was in Gobowen Orthopeadic Hosp earlier this year for surgery on my shoulder and wrist. The pre-op checks were all done correctly and on the day of the op i was treated very good. The op went well and the following physio was excellent. Being diabetic they monitored me all the time. I certainly have no complaints about this hosp. Many thanks to all the staff for taking such good care of me.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 17.

    Preoperative assessment is very inconsistent. Some hospitals assess every elective patient centrally as a matter of course. At others, it seems it is up secretarial staff to decide at the time they book them into operating lists whether or not they have a pre-assessment and whether it is by a trained nurse, anaesthetist or a 1st year junior doctor who has other duties to perform simultaneously.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 15.

    As a nurse who works in an intensive care unit I feel that I have to defend the NHS. Yes there are problems, and there are probably more deaths following emergency surgery of this type than there should be, dut no one has given a though as to why this is the case, other than the usual Daily Mail response that nurses dont care and Drs can't do their job. We do care and we work hard to save lives.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 10.

    Intensive care's very expensive, it was diluted some years ago to High dependency care( for people not quite as ill), and specialised into Coronary care (because they were a special case), the underlying driver was always saving money and the service has short changed for years so why are people now shocked??

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 6.

    If the government stopped trying to push as many cases through as they do, in order to reduce waiting lists, whilst also cutting the number of staff and taking away their pensions, then there would be sufficient time and staff to ensure adequate pre-operative assessments.

    It's about time medical teams took back control of the NHS, rather than politicians who have never spent a day in hospital.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Health stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • Vancouver skylineAsian future?

    Why Canada's growing Chinese communities offer fresh opportunities for the country

Programmes

  • The conductorThe Culture Show Watch

    One of music's most revered and intriguing figures but what does a maestro actually do?

BBC © 2012 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.