Waits rise 'leaves NHS struggling to cope'

Waiting room Hospitals are expected to see patients within 18 weeks in England

Related Stories

Mounting pressure on hospital waiting lists in England has left the NHS "creaking at the seams", doctors say.

Overall, the health service is still hitting its 18-week deadline, but performance is dropping in some areas.

The official NHS data for May showed more people were waiting over 18 weeks than in May 2010 when the coalition was formed.

Doctors' leaders described the trend as worrying, but ministers insisted waiting times were under control.

The figures come as a survey by the independent think tank the King's Fund suggests a quarter of NHS finance directors in England think the cuts they are making will affect patient care.

The NHS has been told it should see 90% of in-patients within 18 weeks - the 10% leeway is allowed to reflect the fact that some patients may wait longer for valid personal or medical reasons.

This expectation was reiterated last month when David Cameron personally promised the standard would be kept in an attempt to calm fears about the government's controversial NHS reform programme.

The latest data showed that 90.8% of the 300,000 patients seen in May were within the timeframe, but this is down from 92.9% in the same month last year.

What is more, the national figures mask the pressure building behind the scenes.


About a third of the country is not meeting the 90% target with the national figure only propped up by other places that are over-performing.

The waiting time battle

The experience of Wirral University Hospital Trust illustrates the problems many parts of the NHS are facing.

A year ago, the trust, which runs services from four hospitals in the Merseyside area, was meeting the 18-week standard.

But the latest figures show Wirral has now dropped below the magical 90% mark for in-patients.

And, worryingly for the future, the number of patients on the waiting list is on the rise.

At last count there was over 30,000 patients still waiting to be treated.

Nearly a third of these have waited for more than 18 weeks, meaning it will only get harder for the hospitals to turn around the situation.

But the organisation is far from alone.

There are more than 50 other hospital trusts that are no longer meeting the waiting time standard.

And with many trusts facing significant savings targets many believe the situation is only going to get worse.

Certain specialities are also facing particular difficulties. In orthopaedics, which is the most common area of non-emergency care and includes operations such as hip and knee replacements, nearly one in seven patients waited longer than 18 weeks.

There are also a growing number of patients facing longer waits - as the BBC revealed earlier this week.

Of the 2.5m still waiting for treatment, there are nearly 225,000 people who have waited over 18 weeks for treatment - up by 8% on a year ago, these latest figures show.

The increasing pressure has been put down to a combination of rising demand and cost-saving measures by trusts, such as cuts to the amount of overtime that is available.

Sir Richard Thompson, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said: "The apparent rise in waiting lists is both worrying for patients and evidence of an underlying cause - the increasing pressures on the NHS in general.

"The NHS is now creaking at the seams. Our members are finding it difficult to cope."

And shadow health secretary John Healey added: "The NHS is starting to go backwards again under the Tories."

But Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said waiting times were a priority for the government and still remained "low and stable".

He added: "This is against a backdrop of rising demand for NHS services, so the low waiting times are a testimony to the hard work of NHS staff."

The the latest King's Fund survey of NHS finance directors found almost half of the 29 respondents need to make efficiency savings of 6% or more this year.

Half of those said they were "uncertain" that they could achieve this, and around a quarter warned it could not be done without harming patient care.

Responding to the survey. Health Minister Simon Burns said managers should be able to deliver savings through working more efficiently.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 13.

    Poddy100 you must be a dyed in the wool Tory, I can see that your comments pick on certain elements of society. Your blinkered views and narrow mindedness are sick making, who would you like to pick on next? The old? the physically or mentally challenged? Don't pass judgement on people you know nothing about.

  • rate this

    Comment number 12.

    My friend recently had a cancer scare at just 18. She was made to wait two weeks for a biposy, three weeks for the results and then told she could not be fitted in for surgery until December. At least under Labour, whatever their other faults, the biopsy to results appointment time was capped at two weeks. The Tories scrapped this. Their "reforms" could have cost my friend her life. Unnacceptable.

  • rate this

    Comment number 11.

    people so quickly forget, the reason we had all the managers was because the doctors were complaining they had to do all the paperwork and did not have time to see patients. Now surprise surprise, we have thrown out the managers and guess what the doctors are getting stuffed again.......you get what you pay for

  • rate this

    Comment number 10.

    What a surprise - the Tories are out to ruin the NHS so that they can sell it off. However bad you think Labour were, you should never trust the Tories with the NHS.

  • rate this

    Comment number 9.

    Perhaps if half the staff actually did something other than chat about their weekend/last nights events, who's going out with who etc, then the waiting lists would be minimal. I see it from the inside, and in all honesty, 70% of the NHS staff work well below par, and for very good money. Do the maths.


Comments 5 of 13


More Health stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.