GP group backs NHS reforms in Telegraph letter
The government says the NHS has to "modernise" through reform.
A group of doctors from GP consortiums in England has said they back NHS reform plans wholeheartedly.
In a letter published in the Daily Telegraph, they said they wanted the government to press on with its Bill.
Much recent criticism of it had been "noticeably misinformed", they said.
The proposals - which give GPs more control over NHS budgets and increase the private sector role - have been criticised by the Royal College of GPs.
The Telegraph letter's lead signatory is Dr Jonathan Munday, chairman of the Victoria Commissioning Consortium, and a former Conservative councillor and mayor.
The other signatories are also chairmen and chairwomen of GP consortiums, who said they had already been working on commissioning care for the last three of four years.
Echoing earlier comments by prime minister David Cameron, they said the reforms were "not revolutionary but an evolution".
"[They are] a natural conclusion of the GP commissioning role that began with fundholding in the 1990s and, more recently, of the previous government's agenda of GP polysystems and pratice-based commissioning," they said.
“Start Quote
End Quote Telegraph letterPatients should feel comfortable that decisions about the local provision of health care are to be taken in future by their family doctors”
The doctors said all that had been proposed was that "instead of clinicians working under the direction of bureaucrats, the balance of influence and responsibility should change".
"Our patients should feel comfortable that decisions about the local provision of health care are to be taken in future by their family doctors, many of whom they know personally," they wrote.
They said that concerns over whether GPs had the skills to commission care were unfounded, adding that they would "not be keeping the books personally".
Part of the reforms which would co-ordinate aspects of care - primary, secondary, community and social - into a "coherent and seamless whole" would benefit "the most elderly, infirm and vulnerable people in our community, whose care is often currently too fragmented", they said.
Bill pausedEarlier this week the government fought off a Commons challenge to its plans. MPs rejected a Labour call for the proposals to be abandoned, but the coalition's parliamentary majority was cut by more than a third.
Labour called the changes "damaging and unjustified", and the Royal College of GPs said they risked "unravelling and dismantling" the NHS.
Ministers are promising "substantive" changes after criticism by Lib Dem MPs. The Deputy Prime minister Nick Clegg has said he will block the reforms unless major changes are made, including calling for guarantees there would not be "back-door privatisation".
The parliamentary debate was held on Monday, after the government agreed to stop the progress of the bill underpinning the reforms.
Last month ministers said they wanted to have a pause - despite the bill already having started to make its way through parliament - to carry out a "listening exercise" over how the plans could be improved.
A decision on how to proceed is expected in mid June.
Health Secretary Andrew Lansley has said the reforms are about ensuring the NHS had a "stronger future".
But he has said he is prepared to make changes to his plans if necessary.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~02~RS~)

Q&A: The NHS shake-up
Doctors plea for Guantanamo care
Refugee numbers 'highest since 1994'
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Coming out in Yemen
Transport in transit
Fast Track
Comment number 11.
The Red Cyclist11th May 2011 - 14:12
Of course there are GPs who want the proposals to go ahead. They are the GPs who are currently bleeding the NHS dry and see this as an opportunity to make even more money. Here in West London we have a GP who earns over £500,000 a year! (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309154/Revealed-The-161-GPs-making-200k-year--ones-raking-astonishing-500-000.html)
Link to this (Comment number 11)
Comment number 10.
danensis11th May 2011 - 12:57
We don't want GPs in charge, we want patients in charge. We don't want a choice of hospitals, we want to know that whichever hospital we go to we will get Gold Standard service. We don't want the money we as taxpayers put into the NHS to go to 3rd party management companies. Why aren't the government listening to patient and consumer groups?
Link to this (Comment number 10)
Comment number 9.
JeremyP11th May 2011 - 12:54
Finally this is reported on the BBC. A couple of weeks ago, Today interviewed a GP running a project consortium. Obviously expecting a stream of criticism from him, Humphreys was left speechless then the GP went totally off message to state that not only are the new plans very good for patients, they are a natural continuation of what Labour did. Very funny.
Link to this (Comment number 9)
Comment number 8.
jacquian11th May 2011 - 12:35
I almost believed the storey. Then i saw that Victoria Commisioning Consortuim were from good old Westminister and members were councillors in that bastian of humanity. Clutching at staws for Cameron as he seeks any support from anywhere. Clegg was seen on Newsnight in January, fully supporting the reforms. So crocadile tears now his party has been stuffed at the local elections. Fooling no one.
Link to this (Comment number 8)
Comment number 7.
Offworld11th May 2011 - 12:00
Evolution running in reverse -- treatment subject to credit-rating and private medical insurance
(which having taken the premiums, may of course decide not to pay out).
That's the real agenda behind these "reforms" ..... corporate US-ification of the UK.
Link to this (Comment number 7)
Comments 5 of 11