Health

Tobacco displays to be banned from shops

  • 9 March 2011
  • From the section Health
  • comments
Cigarettes
Image caption The government is due to publish its tobacco control strategy

Tobacco displays in shops will be banned in England as part of a package of measures to discourage smoking.

Instead, cigarettes and other products will have to be kept under-the-counter from 2012 for large stores and 2015 for small shops, ministers have announced.

A consultation will also be launched on whether manufacturers should be forced to put cigarettes into plain packets.

A fifth of adults smoke - a figure which has remained steady in recent years after decades of rapid falls.

Legislation

Both steps have been under discussion for a number of years with legislation to ban the display of tobacco products put in place by the Labour government before it lost power last year. The coalition had initially said it wanted to review the plan before proceeding.

A number of countries, including Canada, Ireland, Iceland and Finland, have already introduced similar bans, while Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are moving in that direction.

But if England goes ahead with the plan to force tobacco companies to put cigarettes in plain, unbranded packets it will be the first country in Europe to take such a tough line. Australia is due to introduce the measure in 2012.

The plain packaging measure is only a proposal at this stage and will be put forward for consultation. Campaigners believe it will make purchasing cigarettes less appealing and enhance the effectiveness of health warnings.

Both measures have been set out in the government's tobacco control strategy, which marks the start of the publication of a series of public health plans. Separate strategies on alcohol and drugs are expected in the coming months.

The strategy - unveiled on No Smoking Day - also sets out "national ambitions" to reduce smoking rates from 21.2% to 18.5% by the end of 2015, with specific targets for pregnant women and 15-year-olds.

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said he wanted to see the numbers falling faster in the next five years than they had in the past five.

"We want to do everything we can to help people to choose to stop smoking and encourage young people not to start smoking in the first place. We will help local communities to take a comprehensive approach to reducing smoking so we can change social attitudes to smoking."

Martin Dockrell, of the campaign group Ash, praised the government for its plans, saying there was "strong evidence" they would stop people taking up smoking.

On banning shop displays, he added: "Regular smokers know what brand they smoke before they go into the shop and don't need a display to remind them. In truth, these displays serve two functions - they promote brands to new young smokers and they trigger sales to people who did not intend to buy. Every morning when the ex-smoker goes into a shop to buy a paper the tobacco companies are waiting for them, putting their brand in front of them."

Shadow public health minister Diane Abbott said she welcomed the moves, but said they were "building on" what Labour had done through its anti-smoking legislation, including the ban on smoking in public places and on the advertising of tobacco products.

But not everyone is in favour. Tory backbencher Philip Davies described the plain packaging plan was "gesture politics of the worst kind" and would represent a "triumph for the nanny state".

Industry groups also reacted with anger with the Tobacco Manufacturers Association saying there was "no credible evidence" it would work.

The National Federation of Retail Newsagents (NFRN) described the display ban as a "betrayal of our nation of shopkeepers", while smokers lobby group Forest said it would "discriminate against law-abiding consumers".

And Debbie Corris, of the Tobacco Retailers Alliance, added: "If anything, plain packaging will cause a problem with more counterfeiting - plain packets are not that difficult to copy - while banning displays will hit smaller retailers hard. We are disappointed about this."

More on this story

Around the BBC

Related Internet links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites