Titian masterpiece Diana and Callisto saved for nation

 
Titian's Diana and Callisto was owned by the Duke of Sutherland

Titian's Diana and Callisto was owned by the Duke of Sutherland

Related Stories

Titian's Diana and Callisto has been saved for the nation after a £45m ($71.7m) deal was agreed with owner the Duke of Sutherland.

The "supremely important" oil painting was bought with the help of £25m ($39.9m) from the National Gallery after a lengthy fundraising campaign.

Along with partners National Galleries of Scotland, they also saved sister piece Diana and Actaeon in 2009.

Both galleries hailed the "exceptional generosity" of donors.

The two pieces will be displayed together on a rotating basis in London and Edinburgh.

Titian's Diana and Actaeon was purchased three years ago for £50m ($79.7m). The institutions had originally been given until the end of the year to raise money for the second work.

National Gallery director Dr Nicholas Penny said: "For more than 100 years, these two great paintings by Titian have been regarded as pre-eminent among the masterpieces in private hands in the UK.

Antony Gormley: "I think he taught Rubens how to dance. He was the Fred Astaire of painting."

"We have been able to secure both of them for the public, in a period of economic hardship, because of the esteem and affection that both institutions have enjoyed for many decades."

The BBC's arts editor Will Gompertz said seeing the paintings split up "after nearly half a millennium of being together would have been a huge loss in terms of art history and the British public's ability to enjoy these two great paintings".

He added: "For the UK's national galleries to have seen Diana and Callisto leave the country would be like Italy waving goodbye to Michelangelo's David."

The companion pieces were produced in the 1500s by the Renaissance artist and are considered to be among his greatest works.

£5m reduction

They are among six large-scale works, painted for Philip II of Spain, that were inspired by the Roman poet Ovid.

Diana and Callisto depicts a nymph, impregnated by the god Jupiter, being expelled by the goddess.

ANALYSIS

For most people - journalists included - the news that the National Galleries in London and Edinburgh had secured a second Titian painting for the nation came as something of a surprise.

Raising a second £50m in the current climate was never going to be easy, and there were many who felt the fundraisers had exhausted their usual sources - the Scottish Government were among those who made it clear they wouldn't make any further contributions.

But by trawling reserve funds, and exploring legacies and bequests, the galleries have been able to raise the bulk of the cost. A mere £5m from the Heritage Lottery Fund and the Art Fund - and a similar sized discount by the owner - meant the prize was in sight before the 31 March deadline.

The purchase has even more significance for the National Galleries of Scotland because it safeguards the Bridgewater Loan - a collection of works by Raphael, Titian, Rembrandt and Poussin - which is also owned by the Duke of Sutherland and has been on display in Edinburgh since 1945.

It may be a quiet celebration in the current climate but it's a significant achievement for both galleries.

The two Titian paintings form part of the Duke of Sutherland's Bridgewater Collection - featuring works by Raphael, Rembrandt and Poussin - which has been on loan to the National Galleries of Scotland since 1945.

The galleries said the Duke had offered the two paintings at prices "significantly lower than their market value" - estimated to be around a half to a third of what they would be worth on the open market.

National Gallery trustees allocated £25m from its charitable reserves, principally gained from legacies left by members of the public over the past century.

The rest of the money came from the Heritage Lottery Fund, the Art Fund and individual donors and trusts.

Unlike the public appeal the galleries launched to save Diana and Actaeon, the two galleries said they decided against asking for a government grant or public help to raise money for the second painting "during such difficult economic times".

"We have used these reserves before, but never on this scale, and no purchase ever made by the National Gallery has begun to approach the magnitude of this acquisition," Dr Penny said.

He added that the gallery had "very little" of its £32m reserve left for future acquisitions - as much of the remainder has been bequeathed for specific uses, such as education.

Dr Penny said he anticipated being asked why a UK national gallery was spending such large sums to acquire works by a foreign painter.

"If you lined up [British artists] Gainsborough, Turner and Constable, not only would they feel that this was a very great day but they would also admit they would not have been the artists they were had it not been for Titian.

FUNDING FOR DIANA AND CALLISTO

Asking price - £50m

  • £25m from National Gallery charitable reserves
  • £15m donations and grants from individual donors and trusts
  • £3m from Heritage Lottery Fund
  • £2m from Art Fund
  • £5m reduction in asking price by Duke of Sutherland

Total raised - £45m

"We do have quite a few [works by Titian]. But that to me is a question rather similar to, 'there is one play by Shakespeare, do you really need any other ones?'"

John Leighton, director-general of the National Galleries of Scotland, said the risk that the money might not have been raised and the painting would be sold overseas was "a very real one".

"For us in Scotland this has always been about a battle to hold on to what I would describe as our triple AAA status as a great art collection and one of the great European art galleries," he said.

"From today these great paintings belong to the British public and we could not be more thrilled that they will be available for the enjoyment, the education, and the inspiration for generations to come," he added.

Diana and Callisto will be displayed in London for 18 months from Thursday.

It will be joined by Diana and Actaeon - currently on a regional tour - in July. Both will then go on show in Scotland and be the centrepiece of a special display in Edinburgh to coincide with the 2014 Commonwealth Games.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 142.

    Thank goodness for that. I was up all night worrying about these works of art. I presume the good Duke will pay a handsome amout of gains tax on his windfall? Also, seems a bit silly displaying these pictures on a rotational basis- surely they are better in a fixed position for ease of viewing such as the usual peg on a wall? BBC, please give us something worthwhile to comment on?

  • Comment number 141.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 140.

    If you don't get it, leave it to those who do.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 139.

    @ 126. Bibi

    Why should he donate it? He owns something worth £300m and sells it for £100m, I would say that was pretty generous.

    Comments like yours and most others on here just stink of envy that anyone has money. This was not paid for out of our taxes, it is considered an important art piece (not my taste but hey) and it was bought cheaper than value. Where is the problem?

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 138.

    Much as I believe this painting should have been donated and not sold to the nation, the nationality of the artist is completely irrelevant. If you're going to *cleanse* our galleries of all non-British art, they will be largely empty. Seems the xenophobes will find any excuse to dribble their bile on the HYS pages

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 137.

    Will he pay capital gains tax at 40%, i think not, the money will probably go into a tax haven or in to trust and fiddle ordinary uk taxpayer again!!!

  • rate this
    -10

    Comment number 136.

    @ 129. thesilentpsycho

    Or maybe its the fact the English basically destroyed their countries, their way of life, their cultures over the last 800 years. The Scottish national anthem is in English for god shake! O btw, £45 million on a painting. Stupid.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 135.

    Isn't history wonderful in an internet globalised world? It seems we all, as humans, have more access to information to select from in order to continue to fight each other?

    Information used to be the domain of scholars or passed by word of mouth. Sometimes I wish I lived in a cave with so much vitriol on the net. Never mind, there are plenty of good and reasonable people out there..

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 134.

    lets call this painting "part of the lost empire " cos thats just wha it is ......"ruled the world once, now it ruled by 4" by 2" dream on my condistordor friends ....

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 133.

    Not sure I understand how buying a painting of by an Venetian of a Roman myth for a Spanish king counts as "saving it for the nation".

    I don't doubt it's a fabulous painting but frankly, so what?

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 132.

    alot of people are complaining about better sus of the money, but i think this is a great buy

    a world renowned painting is now public property and this was an extremely rare opportunity. Our children dont want to hear that we put passed up the chance to buy it because taxes had to be paid.

  • Comment number 131.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 130.

    25.
    Laurie Knight

    "Titian was not British, this has nothing to do with out culture, why do we need it here?"



    So true of so many

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 129.

    117. redcurtain
    “why do you think that the scots and the irish and the welsh hate the english so much ?”
    Because it’s easier to blame someone else for your problems than it is to take reasonability and actually improve yourselves?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 128.

    What's the big deal? Every year we sit back and watch while our tax-dodging billionaires spend more on private yachts and jets than they do on tax. Yet we'll get up in arms over what is, comparatively, a minor amount spent on an important cultural artifact?

    Priorities, people.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 127.

    oh yay for the mere sum of 45M we can go and stare at a picture,

    seriously the only reason these things fetch 45-50 M is because the galleries are idiotic enough to value them like that, they're just perpetuating the cycle that pushes their value up

    just let some arab buy it, you can only stare at a painting for so long

  • rate this
    -10

    Comment number 126.

    What a shame that the Duke of Sutherland didn't think enough of his nation to donate the painting. Perhaps he hasn't read about the economic crisis, and how desperately funds are stretched. *Significantly under market value* doesn't quite cut it any more.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 125.

    It is all Jupiter's fault for getting the nymph pregnant. He should have known better at his age.

    I don't think it is fair & reasonable for Diana to banish the nymph, now a single homeless mother. Diana should really be giving Jupiter a good telling off instead, for being so irresponsible.& he a married man as well

    Jupiter should be sent on government work experience placement as punishment?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 124.

    @Deleted im not the most knowledgable on these things but lets take a player of somewhat commencerate value say ummm ...Fernando Torres £50mil well spent eh?

    and your profit argument is weaker than a tottenham hotspur title challenge (sticking with the football analogies) this was never a profit making venture

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 123.

    117redcurtain
    Question,. ....why do you think that the scots and the irish and the welsh hate the english so much ??? urrmmm... maybe its because you stole all our national treasures and claimed them as your "own" ?

    Inferiority? Just like the Italians, with their Romans coming over here straightening our roads, changing our place names and stealing our things.... Grow up

 

Page 6 of 13

 

More Entertainment & Arts stories

RSS

Features

  • Nigel Farage (left) and Douglas CarswellWho's next?

    The Tory MPs being tipped to follow Carswell to UKIP


  • A painting of the White House on fire by Tom FreemanFinders keepers

    The odd objects looted by the British from Washington in 1814


  • President Barack Obama pauses during a press conference on 28 August.'No strategy'

    Obama's gaffe on Islamic State reveals political truth


  • Chris and Regina Catrambone with their daughter Maria LuisaSOS

    The millionaires who rescue people at sea


  • Plane7 days quiz

    What unusual offence got a Frenchman thrown off a plane?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.