An anxious time for the UK's newspaper bosses

Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger has warned of an "anxious time" for journalism

Related Stories

It's an anxious - and potentially momentous - time for Britain's newspaper editors, as they assemble for the annual Society of Editors conference in Runnymede in Surrey.

Figures published on Friday showed double-digit falls in circulation for The Independent (down 26% year on year), the Guardian (down 16%), the Financial Times (down 14%) and the Times, which has slipped by 13%.

On Monday, Lord Justice Leveson begins his Government inquiry into the culture, practice and ethics of the press, in response to the News of the World phonehacking scandal, which continues to generate shocking headlines.

Even James Murdoch admitted, in evidence to MPs, that last week's revelation that his company had hired a private detective to spy on lawyers representing the victims of phone-hacking and their families was "appalling" and "unacceptable".

After the failure of the Press Complaints Commission to tackle the phonehacking scandal, the future of press regulation is up for debate.

And, in the wake of the super-injunctions rows earlier this year and the award of privacy damages to the former Formula 1 boss Max Mosley by the British and European courts, legislation on defamation, libel and privacy is also in the spotlight.

Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of the Guardian - which exposed the phonehacking scandal in the face of furious and sustained denials from News International - says it's an "incredibly anxious time for journalism, with even the most powerful and professional newspapers clinging on to financial viability".

Little wonder that the Runnymede editors' conference - under the title "Magna Carta II: a modern Media Charter" - is fielding a stellar line-up of editors, politicians, regulators and lawyers to discuss these critical issues.

James Murdoch will not be at the conference, but two of his inquisitors will - John Whittingdale and Tom Watson, from the Commons culture, media and sport committee.

So will two Cabinet Ministers - Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke and the Attorney General Dominic Grieve - as well as the new chairman of the Press Complaints Commission Lord Hunt, the chairman of the BBC, Lord Patten, and the director of public prosecutions Keir Starmer QC.

Editors speaking include James Harding of The Times, Alan Rusbridger of the Guardian, Chris Blackhurst of the Independent, and the former News of the World editor Colin Myler.

Phonehacking victims' lawyers Mark Lewis and Charlotte Harris will also be in attendance.

Rusbridger says this is a crucial time for the press.

"The coincidence of the Leveson Inquiry with a new defamation bill gives the press a good opportunity to dovetail new proposals on regulation with their widely-shared frustrations at the cost of fighting legal cases."

Delivering the Orwell Lecture last week, he said most journalists didn't want the courts, the state, Europe or MPs to regulate the press.

He proposed that there should be a new independent regulator with teeth, which could also offer a "one-stop-shop" mediation service for libel and privacy cases, as an alternative to the courts.

He suggested the new body could be entitled the Press, Standards and Mediation Commission and replace the existing Press Complaints Commission.

Rusbridger also supported a suggestion by Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Mail, for a press ombudsman who could investigate serious lapses of standards on a "polluter pays" basis.

The debate has started - but with inquiries by the police, judges and MPs all still ongoing, it has only just begun.

Torin Douglas Article written by Torin Douglas Torin Douglas Former media correspondent

A farewell to the BBC

Torin Douglas looks back at 24 years of reporting on media matters for the BBC.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 19.

    I would like to read a newspaper that reports (not makes or manipulates) the news; honourably, decently and without overt bias.

    I am sick and tired of reading… opinion masquerading as news, non-stories that are kept alive until they become major issues and editorial bias attempting to mobilise public opinion. Just tell me what’s happening in the world.

  • rate this

    Comment number 18.

    Editors sitting down with MP's to discuss what a nasty disgusting little industry the editors represent and the MP's fawning over a good headline sometime - I smell a conflict of interests here - No The MP's should not be helping the media industry they should be damn well helping to prosecute the wrong doers and demanding some ethincs from them all!

  • rate this

    Comment number 17.

    There's little point in buying a paper for news, it will be twisted to suit the owners politics. The Mail is always a good laugh, but the star recently has been the Express - on three days they have run headlines claiming the housing market is booming, despite *everyone* else thinking it is static. What's the point in reading the rest? The Telegraph's gaffe with tents at St. Paul's was gem.

  • rate this

    Comment number 16.

    Press Regulation Poses Danger:
    "Estate" sounds so honourable, replete with integrity, courage, even willingness to sacrifice the "all" for the TRUTH.
    When the fourth estate bows to the elite, 99% of people suffer the loss of truth. There is no loss that acts to dumb-down the public & mislead public, even to the extent of wars.

  • rate this

    Comment number 15.

    So the newspapers are worried for their future?
    Aren't we all?

    This is evolution, and many people now obtain their news from the TV and/or the internet.

    In my view, something as basic as "news" should be impartial, and any company or group reporting it should be obliged by law to be impartial.
    The days of the News Barons are over.

    We are better informed than ever, but information must be true.

  • rate this

    Comment number 14.

    @13 JurgenV

    I often come across articles from The Guardian's online version posted by friends about various issues and consistently find myself asking for the balance. So I have to disagree that this particular paper is not included in the list of those branded a unethical, untrustworthy and biased.

    I've never read FT, so can't comment on that one.

  • rate this

    Comment number 13.

    It’s odd that all the comments so far blame the quality of the journalism (unethical, untrustworthy, biased, overpaid), although The Guardian and the FT, my two regular papers, have brilliant quality and often outstandingly insightful and well-written pieces. But it has been years since I subscribed to either. I accept all accusations of hypocrisy, but clearly the paid sections have small value.

  • rate this

    Comment number 12.

    #10 hardylane

    As for papers? Let them all die. Newsprint is dead. Smelly, dirty and corrupt. Let digital media rule. Never bought a newspaper... never will

    Couldn't agree less. Some of us get pleasure from the interaction a printed newspaper provides. Look at the constant stream of letters/emails to their letters pages.Oh, and not all papers are either smelly/dirty or corrupt, if a few are.

  • rate this

    Comment number 11.

    If we don't have a truly free press, in print, on TV/radio and on the web, those in charge, i.e. bankers, CEOs of large companies and the government (in that order), will ride all over us and impose their will on us. We must have, though, a system for ensuring that the press can also be held properly to account. I agree with Alan Rusbridger's suggestion to ensure this.

  • rate this

    Comment number 10.

    People who complain about BBC bias are almost exclusively thick. The right says it is left biased. The left say right. This means balance. They get it right most of the time.

    As for papers? Let them all die. Newsprint is dead. Smelly, dirty and corrupt. Let digital media rule. Never bought a newspaper... never will.

  • rate this

    Comment number 9.

    Ironic the second page of the newspaper I read at my local club now has a permanant appologies and corrections slot,so what happened when did newspapers just think that sounds plausable lets print it and let the individual prove its wrong?

  • rate this

    Comment number 8.

    With regards to newspaper bias, it's not just here in the UK that this happens. Fox news is unabashedly conservative, CNN is known to be left-leaning and most of their papers also take one side or the other. Provided all sides are heard, even those with the most controversal views, it comes down to personal choice as to what to read or watch. Freedom mean's even those we don't like having a voice.

  • rate this

    Comment number 7.

    This is type of situation that prevents public from knowing unbiased (just the facts) truth - recent allegations against Iran by US & other Western countries, including plot to assassinate Saudi ambassador. TRUTH, or FABRICATION to turn public against Iran. Where is the evidence, or is this just an attempt to create bias prior to parliamentary elections in Iran?

  • rate this

    Comment number 6.

    The Newspaper is dead... long live the News!

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    The future has probably to be more free papers, and consolidation, fewer papers, available in all formats like on line or through new phones as no one will pay for them. So that means a huge reduction in the pay given to those working for them. With knock on for the BBC pay rates.

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    Good, investigative journalism has been eroded, all but disappeared. Media freedom is under threat. Elite seeks to control it, resent its function to express the truth. The media has a special role in democracies; yet, how often have we seen newspapers supporting one candidate over another? It's time for all good journalists to Magna Carta their rights & for the public to demand excellence.

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    2011 Society of Editors conference focus – freedom of the media & freedom of expression for everyone. I think perhaps it should have been freedom for journalists to investigate, analyze, & express the facts, regardless who owns the newspaper & what the owners' convictions may be. No emoting, no bias - just the facts please. No journalist should be fired for truthful investigative journalism.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    It will be interesting to see the outcome of this conference. The press have suffered a lot this year due to their own unethical actions, and it's about time that some firmer regulations were put in place to separate them from political persuasions, and write fair and balanced articles that steer away from sensationalism. Will it happen? Probably not.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Media including the papers and the bbc are untrustworthy!

    Living in Scotland we have 75% of papers sympathetic to labour, 25% to the tories. We have bbc Scotland firmly taking labour / unionist line.

    It's not healthy for a democracy to operate where the media enmass peddle propaganda against the Government.

    How long would a westminster government last in similar circumstances?

    C McK



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.