BBC Cuts: Will audiences notice?

 
BBC Television Centre The licence fee has been frozen until April 2017

Today's proposals for implementing a 20% cut in the BBC's budget will radically change how - and where - the corporation operates.

There will be greater use of new technology, and 1,000 jobs will move from London to the north of England, including the digital TV channel BBC Three and Radio 4's consumer programme You & Yours.

The BBC will also move out of Television Centre and its cluster of other buildings in west London.

But how much will be noticed by listeners and viewers?

£200 million of the savings will come from cutting programmes. Daytime shows on BBC Two will be replaced by news and repeats of factual programmes; there'll be fewer lunchtime concerts on Radio 3; local radio stations will share programming outside peak listening times; and children's programmes will move off BBC One and Two, to the dedicated channels CBBC and CBeebies.

Critics say this amounts to salami-slicing and that the BBC should simply have sacrificed a TV channel, such as BBC3 or BBC4. But director general Mark Thompson said that would have saved less money than the decision to cut sports rights by 15 per cent.

'Watershed moment'

Some areas have been spared the worst of the cuts, because they are seen as central to the BBC's core public purposes.

Radio 4's programme budget will not be cut, though it will have less money for factual programmes and slightly more repeats. It will also benefit from reinvestment money, to fund new landmark factual series such as A History of the World In 100 Objects.

BBC One is also largely protected, and will gain reinvestment money for drama and comedy. Money is also being found for an increased investigations fund for Panorama, and for serious science, history, business, arts and natural history programmes for BBC Two and BBC Four.

But programme budgets are only half the story. Most of the savings are due to come from finding cheaper ways of working, through new technology, job cuts and new terms and conditions for BBC staff.

Two thousand jobs will go, including more than 300 senior management posts and several hundred in the BBC's news division, even though news is one of the BBC's core priorities. That's been criticised by the general secretary of the National Union of Journalists, Michele Stanistreet.

"It's obviously a really bad watershed moment for the BBC today and a really bad day for British journalism," he said.

"Our members will be reflecting on the impact of the cuts in their own areas when we meet next week, and I would imagine strike action is inevitable."

Technicians' union Bectu says strikes are likely before Christmas unless the BBC changes its stance.

Today's changes aren't set in stone. The BBC Trust has begun a three-month consultation, asking licence-fee payers for their views on the programme proposals.

But with no TV channel or radio station facing closure (like BBC 6 Music and the Asian Network, both reprieved after public protests), and local radio and BBC Four hit less hard than at one time feared, few expect licence-fee payers to be marching on Broadcasting House.

 
Torin Douglas, Media correspondent Article written by Torin Douglas Torin Douglas Former media correspondent

A farewell to the BBC

Torin Douglas looks back at 24 years of reporting on media matters for the BBC.

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 1.

    Hardly the once-in-a-generation restructuring that Thompson describes. Still all those channels (BBC This and BBC That) - and now even an admission that they can't fill them so there'll have to be more repeats! Bonkers. They should have just stuck to making damn good programmes for BBC-1 & 2, invested in a proper HD service, and let the market do the multi-channel stuff. This will be revisited.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 2.

    There will be no perceptible change.

    Viewers will still be lumbered with what BBC executives want to foist upon them, not what the viewers really want.

    The viewers wanted Doctor Who, Michael Grade said no - so no Doctor Who.

    The viewers want Only Fools and Horses repeats, the DG denounces repeats - no Only Fools repeats.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 3.

    The decision not to dump BBC THREE (or FOUR) was apparently taken not on qualitative grounds but becase - quantitatively - it would not have saved as much money as the cuts announced today.

    How about dumping an unloved channel AND 'some' of the today's cuts, albeit less swingeing.

    Why did it have to be either/or? (Just so that the decision could be made on the flip of a coin?)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 4.

    #3. So Delivering QUANTITY First; Delivering QUALITY Second. That's the real story.

    If that is what it has come to, then no - viewers won't notice any difference.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    I agree - cut BBC 3 or 4 and some cuts overall. Don't touch radio 4 - it is so important to have it, and I cannot believe that factual programmes will have less money... our priorities in this country really surprise me sometimes.

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features

  • A painting of the White House on fire by Tom FreemanFinders keepers

    The odd objects looted by the British from Washington in 1814


  • Chris and Regina Catrambone with their daughter Maria LuisaSOS

    The millionaires who rescue people at sea


  • Plane7 days quiz

    What unusual offence got a Frenchman thrown off a plane?


  • Children testing a bridge at a model-making summer school in Crawley, West SussexSeeding science Watch

    The retired professor who turned village children into engineers


  • Krouwa Erick, the doctor in Sipilou town at the border of Ivory Coast and Guinea - 27 August 2014Bad trip

    The Ebola journey no-one in Ivory Coast wants to take


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.