Jonathan Ross defends BBC salary


Jonathan Ross: "I never said I was worth more than 1,000 journalists"

Related Stories

Jonathan Ross has defended the salary he received while at the BBC, saying he was paid less than his market value.

Speaking to Richard Bacon on 5 live, the broadcaster and chat show host said he "turned down millions" to stay with the corporation.

"Sure, I was paid a lot of money, but I'm not in a regular job," he said on Wednesday. "I'm in show business and I was at the top of my game."

Ross's last contract with the BBC was reportedly worth £6m a year.

The 50-year-old left the BBC in July 2010 after 13 years. The same month he signed a new deal to present a chat show for ITV.

His departure followed the "Sachsgate" affair, in which Ross and comedian Russell Brand left lewd messages on the answer machine of actor Andrew Sachs.

Jonathan Ross and Jane Goldman Ross claimed that newspapers had hacked his phone and that of his wife Jane Goldman

Ross said the pressure he felt after the incident, together with media scrutiny over his salary, contributed towards his decision to leave.

"When the money became such a big story in the papers, I didn't enjoy the scrutiny.

"I didn't think it was fair because I turned down a much bigger offer to go outside than stay at the BBC. So I felt odd I was painted as this greedy guy when, in actual fact, I turned down millions to stay there."

However the presenter said he had enjoyed working for the corporation, asserting that the BBC "still makes some of the best TV in the world".

"Its funding is a great thing and I'm glad I'm not there to be used as a stick to beat them with any more. So that's the good that came out of it," he said.

"It wouldn't have got any easier for me or [the BBC] if I stayed there. So by mutual decision we said 'let's take a break.'"

BBC 'Too defensive'

However, Ross criticised the BBC for becoming over-cautious in the wake of the Sachs affair, echoing comments made by comedy producer John Lloyd earlier this week.

Lloyd, who helmed the likes of Blackadder, Not The Nine O'Clock News and QI, accused the corporation of making programmes "by committee" to avoid causing offence.

"Sauciness is no longer allowed before 9pm anywhere on the BBC - particularly not on BBC One," he wrote in the Radio Times.

Ross argued the introduction of compliance forms to the BBC production process in the wake of "Sachsgate" was not his fault.

"Maybe I lit the fuse paper, but I didn't stack the bonfire - I think they did that to themselves," he said.

"They were far too defensive and still continue to be defensive."

Elsewhere in the hour-long interview, Ross claimed his phone had been hacked by a newspaper.

"The police contacted us and told us my number and my wife's number was on the list," he said, "and various friends, and my agents, and people we'd been calling."

"The thing is... because they hadn't got any stories out of them, there's nothing much you can do, because you have to prove some damage."

Ross added that he believed newspapers other than the News Of The World were involved, and said he would take legal action if he could prove the law had been broken.

"I would pursue that as strongly as I could."

The Jonathan Ross Show begins on ITV on Saturday.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 189.

    If people don't think this guy is worth his salary then don't watch him, don't tune in to him, don't buy the things he endorses.

    If you (collectively) spend your money on things that make him rich don't complain that he's rich. This is show business, nobody is forced to watch presenters they dislike.

    I think Ross is a waste of space so when he comes on my TV I change channel.

  • rate this

    Comment number 180.

    He was worth it - and I'll tell you why. 6m is small compared to production costs and TV rights spent elsewhere on the BBC and we got a talented man - as defined by viewing figures (and not the nay-sayers). He was doing Friday Night, award shows, Film review, radio, etc - all good stuff. That was value for money. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Maybe we should get presenters that cost 20K?

  • rate this

    Comment number 170.

    I love the self-righteous outrage people feel over Ross' salary. He gets paid £6m because someone was willing to pay that, and they felt it was worth it.

    If you want to blame anyone, blame the BBC for writing the cheques. Personally I wouldn't, because Ross' show was great.

    Just because you can't do a job that requires someone to pay you £m's, doesn't mean you get to criticize those who do.

  • rate this

    Comment number 143.

    There aren't many like Ross to the pound, he is a scarce resource just like Messy is in football. If you want the best then you have to pay. I want the best TV so I'm happy to pay BBC £140 a year for my licence. The BBC and the public shot themselves in the foot in their clamour to have him sacked, when he came off air we were all the poorer. Just hope he hasn't lost his edge.

  • rate this

    Comment number 135.

    ..Of course in a perfect world nurses would earn millions a year and Premiership footballers (& TV celebritys) would earn what nurses earn.....of course we don't live in that world and in the world we live in Rossy is worth what he's worth - which is more than the competition.
    Take away the cheekie chappie persona and I reckon Jonathan is a genuinly nice guy who knows the world is skewed!


Comments 5 of 9


More Entertainment & Arts stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.