Rare Jane Austen manuscript sells for £993,250
Every page is littered with crossings out, revisions and additional text
There was a very real possibility of Jane Austen's rare manuscript being sold to a foreign buyer who might well have then taken it abroad.
And because the manuscript had been in Britain for less the 50 years there would have been no recourse to the Export Licensing Committee to stop that from happening.
I was in the auction room watching the tense sales process take place.
By the time it had come down to a two-horse race we were left with one bidder in the room and one on the telephone.
The Sotheby's member of staff on the telephone was not speaking English. But it was the man in the room who won when the hammer came down on his bid of £850,000 (£993,250 after sales tax).
When asked on whose behalf he had bought the manuscript all he would reply was "an institution".
That could quite easily have been the Morgan Library in New York which already owns an eight-page element of the manuscript.
But as I found out, it was in fact The Bodelian Libraries in Oxford who acquired the unfinished novel, with the help of a substantial grant from the National Heritage Memorial Fund (£894,700).
Judging by the size of the grant their success was a close run thing - many more leaps of £20,000 in the bids being invited by the auctioneer and it would seem that they might have been out of the running.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~07~RS~)




Obama defends 'just' drones war
'Field of diamonds'
The dogulator
Slave pride
Le Shopping?
Winning business
Talking Movies
Comment number 5.
blogplusplus26th July 2011 - 7:52
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comment number 4.
Tancredi24th July 2011 - 13:45
[above] 'The Bodelian Libraries in Oxford who ...'
Last time I looked, the Bodleian Library was inanimate, and thus a which and not a who. It is also spelled as I spell it: does not this site have any sub-editors?
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 3.
Odicean21st July 2011 - 17:07
Is there something wrong with your comment posting apparatus?
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 2.
dieseltaylor20th July 2011 - 14:03
I am a Jane Austen fan but I do think that a photocopy would reveal all the information claimed to be in the original and saved the odd £990,000.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 1.
ian-russell19th July 2011 - 7:43
What will they do with it (meaning, what use is it)?
Link to this (Comment number 1)