The Hepworth: Is our love of modern art here to stay?

 

The BBC's arts editor Will Gompertz went for a sneak preview inside the Hepworth

The Hepworth in Wakefield is the latest modern art gallery to be built in Britain.

It joins Middlesbrough, Eastbourne, Gateshead, Margate and Nottingham on the list of places with snazzy new art houses.

There are many others across the country that have either been completely refurbished or greatly expanded. So what are we witnessing: a fad or the future?

I suspect the latter. Britain has not always been pro-modern art. The papers used to sneer while the public would jeer. "Call that art" was the general refrain. Now the reverse is true, we don't seem to be able to get enough of the stuff.

Why? Well one reason is that all these modern art galleries have helped introduce the subject to a much wider audience, often in a way and within an environment that is friendly and welcoming.

Big draw

The idea that artists have spent the past 100 years hood-winking us has dissipated, to be replaced by an intellectual engagement with their work that many find rewarding.

Barbara Hepworth at work on the plaster for Oval Form (Trezion) , 1963, Photograph: Val Wilmer, Bowness, Hepworth Estate Barbara Hepworth is thought of as one of the great artists of the 20th Century

And because modern art is an ongoing story, with each new chapter bringing fresh ideas as well as adding context to the past, I think our involvement with the subject will increase not decrease.

Take the recently opened Turner Contemporary in Margate for example (designed by David Chipperfield as is The Hepworth). I wrote about it in February having had an early preview.

I was captivated by Chipperfield's architecture. The post received several comments, many unhappy about the money lavished on the project.

The gallery received 70,000 visitors in its first month. That's extraordinary. One thousand people a day are currently visiting the place - twice the budgeted figure for this period.

Sure the numbers might slide, but then that's what people said about Tate Modern. With good management and an imaginative programme I expect Turner Contemporary will still be going strong this time next year.

Look at Nottingham Contemporary. It opened at the end of 2009 and continues to big a big draw, even with its uncompromisingly avant-garde programme.

'Withered and snapped'

The local council reckon it was responsible for bringing £8.7m into the local economy, while also providing a significant educational resource to the city and adding an internationally recognised attraction.

Which is why although they are expensive to build and costly to run, such cultural buildings are seen as an ace in the pack when it comes to urban regeneration.

It's certainly the thinking behind The Hepworth, which should also succeed. Not only is it another excellent building (not quite as magical as Turner Contemporary in my view) but it also has the advantage of a stellar permanent collection of Dame Barbara Hepworth's sculptures.

Some of which has come from the now defunct Wakefield Gallery, but many others have come from St Ives in Cornwall where the Wakefield-born Hepworth settled after a spell in London.

These works are fabulous and fascinating and have been seen by very few people. I was lucky to do some years ago.

The new Wakefield gallery showcases the work of Dame Barbara Hepworth

They consist of a collection of 44 plaster and aluminium sculptures that were hidden away from the public in an old cinema in St Ives called the Palais de Danse.

Barbara Hepworth bought the Palais in 1961 having outgrown her studio over the road (which has since been transformed into the Barbara Hepworth Museum and Sculpture Garden).

She did little to change the Palais. The dance floor was still there, so was the stage upon which the cinema screen was mounted.

On the floor was the outline of one her most famous sculptures - Single Form, which she made for the United Nations building in New York in 1961-64. It was a striking sight.

Not only the scale of the sculpture (it was her largest work) but also the stark reminder of the physicality of her work.

It conjured a picture of the petite Hepworth standing, kneeling and stooping over the work, worrying away at it until she felt it was finished. The other plaster sculptures had the same effect.

They were just sitting on the floor, dusty and chipped, not the perfect and polished examples that are now in The Hepworth.

The strings she famously used to give a sense of tension and materiality to her art had mostly withered or snapped, paint had chipped and cracks had developed.

Their poor condition gave a real sense of them having been made by a human and not a machine: the carving scars prominent and proud, the result of a determined assault on the material to give it vitality and life.

I have long thought it a shame that these almost primal works were not on view to the public.

Barbara Hepworth is one of the great artists of the 20th Century and these plaster sculptures give a particular insight into how she worked. I'm delighted they are now on public view.

 
Will Gompertz, Arts editor Article written by Will Gompertz Will Gompertz Arts editor

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    Da Vinci said that "he that can copy can do"

    it is given to a precious few to emulate his standard... through hard work,inspired teaching and technical and creative genius

    whereas many Contemporary artists languish at a level I left at primary school if not before....both at a technical and intellectusal level

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 10.

    As an artist of substantial ability and background knowledge I will concede there is some modern art of substantial merit but much of what finds favour at these hugely subsidised venues tends to appeal to the artistically challenged who have egos in inverse proportion to their ability to percieve let alone produce great art.
    True art is produced in response to genuine reflection

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    2)the mass media are controlled by a tiny minority(mainly private and corporate interests and and THEY decide whether some arguments recieve exposure or not.publicly funded art is not open to public scrutiny in any meaningful way.
    3)art education has been hijacked by the the intellectual and psuedo intellectual as opposed to gifted creatives

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    Speaking as an artist and someone who feels passionately about art I feel the need to correct you on a few points.
    1)the questionmarks against much modern art hasn 't dissipated....if anything it has intensified because most practitioners of merit are dismayed by the low priority given to work of percievable skill and far from telling great truths,much contemporary art actually says very little

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    all you really need to know about this phenomenon is that it is subsidised by taxpayers money. here endeth the lesson

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.