Nurseries not preparing children for school - Ofsted

 
Children at school More structured learning led by teachers is the answer, says Ofsted

Related Stories

Too many nurseries are failing to ensure children are ready to learn when they get to primary school, Ofsted's chief inspector says.

Sir Michael Wilshaw says England's poorest children are especially badly served, as only a third reach a good level of development in pre-schools.

A greater emphasis on structured learning within school-based nurseries is the answer, he says.

But child experts say formal learning too early can be counterproductive.

However, Ofsted's findings chime with the government's view of how to improve early-years provision.

Children's Minister Liz Truss has said repeatedly that she wants to see more teacher-led sessions in the nation's nurseries.

And she has praised nurseries in other European countries, such as France, where children take part in many teacher-led activities.

But the proposals are likely to anger some childcare experts who already argue that early education is damaging children by pushing them too hard at a young age.

'Can't hold a pen'

In a speech launching Ofsted's first stand-alone report on early-years education, Sir Michael highlighted the gap between outcomes for children from disadvantaged backgrounds and youngsters from more affluent homes.

He called for primary school admissions rules to be changed so that greater priority could be given to poorer children - on condition that they had taken up a state-funded nursery place in the school "from the earliest age possible".

Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Sir Michael said it was particularly important that nurseries provided good early years education in poorer areas where children tended to be less well prepared for school by their parents.

Analysis

Sir Michael Wilshaw wants more formal, structured learning in England's nurseries and playgroups to close the attainment gap between rich and poor.

He wants to ensure children join reception classes with the building blocks for learning - such as letters and numbers and the ability to use a pencil - learnt in "good quality" settings.

And he urges policy makers not to "pander to" the "chattering classes", who may fear "children's childhoods are being stolen".

The government agrees a more structured, teacher-led approach is the answer - even for toddlers.

But many early-years experts say children need to be able to play freely to learn - with more formal teaching coming only when they are ready for it.

They say toddlers learn the fine-motor skills to hold a pencil by honing their gross-motor skills, which they use to push a toy train for example, through play.

And some worry a shift away from child-led learning will set late developers up for future failure.

"More than two-thirds of our poorest children - and in some of our poorest communities that goes up to eight children out of 10 - go to school unprepared," he said.

"That means they can't hold a pen, they have poor language and communication skills, they don't recognise simple numbers, they can't use the toilet independently and so on."

Sir Michael added: "The corollary of not preparing children well for school is that they don't do well in reception and, if they don't do well in reception, they don't get on at key stage one, they find it difficult to read at seven, they fail at the end of primary school and that failure continues into secondary school.

Beatrice Merrick, British Association of Early Childhood Education: ''We must not rush to formal learning too early''

"When we talk about social mobility, rather than focus at the end of school, we should actually worry about what's happening at the very start of a child's life - the rot sets in early."

He said the best provision was in "school-based nurseries and school-led nurseries" because head teachers "can track the progress of children in those school-based nurseries all the way into reception and beyond and make sure they do well".

In his speech later he will say that in some areas of the country, particularly London, "most children do well and the gap between advantaged and disadvantaged is closing".

He will add: "There is nothing inevitable about the link between poverty and failure. Indeed, we have to ask ourselves why, if this is being done well in some places, it isn't being done everywhere else."

'Chronic under-funding'

But National Day Nurseries Association head Purnima Tanuku, also appearing on Today, told Sir Michael he was "missing the most important point here".

"Your own report suggests that more than 80% of private and voluntary day nurseries are actually delivering good or outstanding quality," she added.

In the zone Child-led activities underpin much of what goes on in nurseries

She said Sir Michael was "actually condemning the sector based on a very small minority.

"I'm not sure when the last time Sir Michael set foot into a private or voluntary nursery, as opposed to a nursery school.

"He would see the high quality of play-based learning and a very suitable environment."

And the Pre-School Learning Alliance, which represents 14,000 early-years providers in the private and voluntary sector, said the assertion that school-based nurseries were the best early learning environments for young children was completely misguided.

"We are at a loss to understand why Sir Michael has essentially dismissed the existing huge network of experienced, passionate group settings and childminders who currently provide excellent, and appropriate, care for young children despite chronic under-funding and a never-ending wave of ill-researched, ill-thought-out early-years policies."

Liz Bayram, chief executive of the Professional Association for Childcare and Early Years, said increasing the level of formal education delivered to pre-school children would not help reduce inequality or provide children with a strong foundation for success in the classroom and beyond.

"The evidence shows that high quality childcare delivered through a play-based approach to learning is vital to help children develop the social, emotional and physical skills they need to thrive and is one of the most effective ways to lift children out of disadvantage. A child's confidence, independence and willingness to learn is more important than being able to recognise letters, sit still and focus on a task."

A Department for Education spokesperson said starting to learn from a young age with high-quality teacher-led provision could have a real and lasting impact on children's development and life chances.

'Flexible and affordable'

"High-quality school nurseries will enable children who are behind to catch up with their peers before starting school.

Nursery Ofsted inspections have been overhauled to place a renewed focus on basic education for under-fives

"We have been clear that we want to ensure more flexible, affordable and high-quality provision is available for parents - we know many would prefer longer school nursery opening hours, mirroring the working day.

"We have already made great strides in early-years provision with the introduction of the new early-years pupil premium, strengthened early-years qualifications and encouraging schools to open from 8am to 6pm."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +12

    Comment number 700.

    Has it occurred to anyone that young children might not learn as well from teacher-led sessions and that play-based learning might be better in these early years? So rather than use nurseries to prepare children for primary school, perhaps we should be adapting the primary schools to better serve our children.

    I suspect the focus on teacher-led classes is driven more by economics than education.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 665.

    Nurseries aren't there to prepare children for anything. They are a minding/entertaining service for parents who would rather be in paid employment.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 648.

    I chose to be a stay at home mum until our youngest was 7. I taught them to read and write - through playing games. They were little sponges and soaked up all new experiences be they 'educational' 'social' or just plain old fun. I think too many parents today do not put themselves out for their children - relying on 'gadgets' as babysitters and nurseries to do all 'educating!' Shame.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 627.

    Wealth has no bearing on a childs education. If a parent is interested in their childs progress they will sit with them and introduce them to books by reading stories, giving them pencils to draw their own pictures or colour printed ones no matter what they earn. Income only has an impact when parents can afford private schools or private tuition. Please let the babies be babies!!

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 574.

    The problem is not Nurseries - read the Early Years Foundation Stage - Nurseries are committed to the positive development of children and preparing them for school. The issue is that pre school or nursery is NOT compulsory. The Government funds15 hrs p/week for young children BUT some parents don't use it. It's those children who are not prepared! Stop bashing Nurseries and Pre-school

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.