Many mothers 'feel discriminated against at work'


Rebecca Raven said she lost her job after saying she was pregnant; the CBI's Neil Carberry said employers should try to help make things work

Related Stories

More than a quarter of mothers in the UK feel discriminated against at work, a survey suggests.

A third of 1,975 women questioned for legal firm Slater and Gordon said they found it impossible to climb the career ladder and 54% said their employer could do more to support working mums.

Yet 35% thought they worked harder since having children.

Employers said businesses were better than ever at managing maternity leave and reintegrating mothers.

And England's employment minister Jo Swinson said it was illegal to sack a woman because she is pregnant or on maternity leave.

"Such action constitutes pregnancy discrimination and could result in an employer in front of an employment tribunal," she added.

"The government is committed to making sure that more businesses make the best use of women's talents throughout the organisation, from boardroom to the shop floor.

"This is why from April 2015 we're introducing shared parental leave and pay which will allow couples to choose how they share care for their child in the first year after birth."

Kiran Daurka Few women speak out when they suffer discrimination, says Kiran Daurka

But a total of 35% of the mothers questioned across the UK by One Poll in July said their workplace was not supportive of their situation when they were pregnant and 31% felt they were not well treated by their employer while on maternity leave.

Some 27% said they had felt under pressure to return to work earlier than they wanted too.

Once back in the workplace, 29% felt they had been overlooked for a promotion because they had responsibilities as a mother.

Career progression

In other findings:

  • 48% thought their chances of career progression had been halted since becoming a mother
  • 51% thought the attitudes of colleagues and bosses towards them changed once they had announced their pregnancy
  • Of the 25% of mothers who felt they had been discriminated against at work, 48% felt overlooked for a promotion, 18% felt demoted and 35% had had responsibility taken off them
  • 70% of mothers had never made a formal complaint about unfair treatment and of these, 26% did not want to "rock the boat"

Slater and Gordon employment lawyer Kiran Daurka said: "It is shocking that so few women speak out when they suffer discrimination.

"Employers aren't really talking about the issues here - they're burying their heads in the sand. They need to think creatively, because mums can work so flexibly.

"We need to get the issues out there. I hope this topic will become more openly discussed and, as women realise they are not alone, have rights and can take action, we can move forward."

But Neil Carberry, director of employment and skills at the CBI, said: "We don't recognise the picture painted here.

"Our experience is that the workplace has changed fundamentally over the past 30 years. Businesses are better than ever at managing maternity leave and reintegrating mothers on their return.

"The law is crystal clear on employers' responsibilities. It is important to be clear that no business should ever discriminate against a woman on the basis of pregnancy. If they do, she should feel confident to raise a grievance."

Flexible working

John Allan, national chairman of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: "Small businesses are family-friendly and often have a family-feel to them.

"Most will do all that they can to accommodate their staff during this period, allowing for changes to their working schedules and flexible working wherever possible.

"However, a member of staff going on maternity or paternity leave can have a significant impact on small businesses, so it is important that the employer is made aware of the pregnancy in a timely manner."

Siobhan Freegard, co-founder of the parenting website Netmums, said: "There is certainly a major problem with talented and experienced mums not being able to find jobs with family friendly hours, but the smartest companies are beginning to address this with ideas like flexible working, remote working and job shares.

"These companies know it's cheaper and more efficient to pay maternity leave and get back a committed employee who knows the business - rather than to make women so uncomfortable they leave and the firm is forced to expensively hire an unknown, untried and untested new member of staff."

Last month, former Labour minister Yvette Cooper revealed that she had felt "cut off" by Whitehall officials when she was on maternity leave for a second time.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 201.

    At the end of the day there should never be discrimination against anyone pregnant or not. But show common sense, if you run a company you have to consider everything in the best interest of your company. Lets face facts you are not going to offer a directorship to someone who could be out for a year or am I being stupid and unreasonable?

  • rate this

    Comment number 158.

    An important point that people seem to have missed is, how did we suddenly get in a situation where the cost of living (especially housing) is so high that both parents now HAVE to work? It was never like this a couple of decades ago, one parent could usually stay at home a be a housewife or househusband. Now that both parents work and get paid, suddenly things cost more, particularly housing.

  • rate this

    Comment number 77.

    Maternity/paternity leave may be a great idea in an ideal world, but from the employers perspective it is a great inconvenience and expense. I have known several women who have taken maternity leave, returned to work for a few weeks and then quit their jobs.

    Employers have enough to worry about without the discontinuity that this causes, nevermind the cost.

  • rate this

    Comment number 71.

    Common sense has flown out the window on this issue.
    Some women choose not to have children, they sacrifice that choice to do longer hours behind the desk. They don't take maternity leave or work shortened hours. Why discriminate against these women?
    The bottom line is that women, and some men, generally put themselves at a disadavantage when they have children. It is like having a second job.

  • rate this

    Comment number 70.

    If you decide to have children in the end its your choice and the employer should not be forced to endure staff shortages and instability in its work force. Either the father should become a primary carer or the mother. Your employer is there to pay for your services and not become an extended family. PS the Government needs to stop badgering stay at home parents to work.


Comments 5 of 9


More Education & Family stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.