Pensioners should pay more tax, argues Fabian Society

Pensioners on bikes Most older people are neither wealthy baby-boomers nor pensioners on the breadline, the report says

Related Stories

Better-off older people should pay tax at the same rate as younger people on similar incomes, a think tank argues.

The report from the Fabian Society argues that as older people are no longer always poor they should "share the pain of deficit reduction".

"All policies that appear to give special advantages to older people as a category should be reviewed," it says.

Age UK said financial options for elderly people were often very limited.

Researchers for the left-of-centre Fabian Society analysed data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Elsa).

The paper, part of a series produced for the Hanover housing charity, suggests that the majority of older people are neither wealthy baby-boomers with "a surfeit of wealth and leisure" nor "pensioners on the breadline facing poverty, isolation and ill health".

'Profound implications'

"The truth is that the majority of older people today are somewhere in between, neither rich nor poor, and the middle is expanding as a result of recent successes in reducing pensioner poverty," writes author Andrew Harrop.

"Of course this is something to welcome and celebrate, as part of the steady decline of pensioner poverty, but it has profound implications," he argues.

The paper says that "older people catching up with everyone else was not problematic while middle incomes were rising across the board.

"Perhaps it is more so today with growth in median earnings at a standstill."

Mr Harrop cites figures from 2010-11 that suggest that the real incomes of the middle fifth of all households were no greater than in 2003-04 "but middle incomes for retired households were 13% higher".

He added: "Since the financial crisis this disparity has become even more stark: real middle incomes have fallen by 5% overall, but they have risen 5% for retired households."

The report says that when it comes to disposable incomes after housing costs, pensioner couples are now in the top half of UK income distribution because 80% of them are homeowners and most are no longer paying rent or mortgages.

But, Mr Harrop argues, rising house prices have meant a fall in the share of people aged under 45 who are owner occupiers, "with the median 25 to 34-year-old now renting rather owning their home".

Start Quote

It can be difficult for older people to change their financial plans as their options are likely to be very limited”

End Quote Michelle Mitchell Age UK

When it comes to taxation, the paper highlights a "really significant intergenerational unfairness", with retired middle-income households paying 27% of their gross income in tax, compared with 33% for non-retired households with the same income.

The paper concludes that "in financial terms alone, older people are no longer special", and it calls on the government to assess the evidence for existing rules on social security, taxation and the design of services.

The paper says moves to equalise the tax system would have to be carried out more slowly to avoid a sudden fall in living standards.

'Safety net'

In the meantime, it suggests the government should consider taking national insurance from earnings after state pension age and ending tax-free lump sums on private pensions.

It also argues for more taxes on property, such as a land value tax or a reformed council tax, to suppress rises in house prices.

On top of this, the paper suggests scrapping current rules that guarantee that the state pension "will rise annually by an average of 0.26% more than earnings" and restricting universal benefits to pensioners, such as winter fuel allowance, free TV licences and free bus travel.

Michelle Mitchell, of Age UK, said: "The Fabian Society is right to point out that there has been significant progress in tackling pensioner poverty in recent years. But there are still 1.7 million pensioners living in poverty today, while a further 1.1m have incomes only just above the poverty line.

"It can be difficult for older people to change their financial plans as their options are likely to be very limited. They have also contributed national insurance payments throughout their working lives to receive in return a state pension that ensures a financial safety net but little more."

A Treasury spokesperson said the government was committed to ensuring that older people are able to live with the dignity and respect they deserve and the basic state pension is the foundation of state support for older people.

"In difficult economic times, we have protected the benefits of those who have little means to increase their income, for instance pensioners."

A spokesman for the Department for Communities and Local Government said: "At a time when people are fighting for every pound in their pocket a tax hike is the last thing they need. The government has repeatedly made clear it will not be introducing any changes to council tax banding."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 127.

    I am a pensioner. Yes, I paid tax all my working life. No, I never got any benefits. Yes, I pay tax on my modest pension. Yes, my state pension is deducted from my personal allowance - so I pay tax on that too. Every younger person posting on here promoting more tax for pensioners will, God willing, eventually reach pension age. Perhaps then their opinions will change.

  • rate this

    Comment number 111.

    What a cruel take on pensioners - not all of us are comfortable and wealthy in our old age. Try looking after a sick husband for years juggling your work round his needs so no promotions, no climbing the ladder of success, no ending up with a good private pension and a few treats when you retire. This jealousy and hatred towards older people must stop - remember you will be old one day too.

  • rate this

    Comment number 308.

    By the time I reach pension age, I will have worked and paid tax for 51 years. In this time I have never had a holiday abroad, do not have SKY or a smartphone and have chosen to try to save for my retirement. Why should I be penalised for being prudent? I am already working for 6 years longer than I was supposed to - that's 6 years more tax and 6 years less pension.

    I think I've done my part!

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    So, work hard all your life, pay tax all your life, organise a good pension and get taxed again?

    Tell me the reason it's not good to be on state benefits again?

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Actually pensioners ALREADY pay tax on their savings. They have paid tax all their lives and what little they do have is being eroded by low interest rates, 22% tax on saving (in effect a negative interest rate on savings) and a decline in annuity rates. This is just a ruse to ensure pensioners remain poor. Pensioners didn't cause the crash, bankers did.


Comments 5 of 1061


More Education & Family stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.