'Not enough strenuous activity' in school PE


How fee paying independent schools compare with state schools

Related Stories

There is not enough strenuous, physical activity in many of England's school PE lessons, education inspectors say.

Teachers tend to talk too much in sessions and often lack specialist training, the Ofsted report on primary and secondary PE adds.

It also highlights the fact that only a minority of schools play competitive sport at high level.

The government says its draft PE curriculum will put competitive sport back at the heart of school life.

Ofsted inspectors visited 120 primaries and 110 secondaries over a four-year period.

Olympic legacy

Overall the report said PE teaching was good or outstanding in two-thirds of the primary schools it visited, and three-quarters of the secondary schools it saw. This was an improvement on the results of its last survey in 2008, it said.

And it put much of this down to the School Sports Partnership programme, saying its impact in "maximising participation and increasing competition was clearly evident in the vast majority of schools visited".

The programme was scrapped by Education Secretary Michael Gove but partially reinstated on a dramatically reduced budget following an outcry from heads, schools and politicians.

Start Quote

We found there often wasn't enough physical, strenuous activity in PE lessons”

End Quote Sir Michael Wilshaw Ofsted chief inspector

But Ofsted warned that sustaining this level of improvement would be challenging against the "backdrop of greater expectations following last summer's London Games".

And called for a new national strategy building on the success of the School Sports Partnership Programme.

Stamina and strength

However the report found some important positive point, with most schools providing at least two hours of PE a week for pupils aged five to 14.

And only a fifth of primary schools did not ensure that all pupils could swim before they left.

However, it was concerns about the content and nature of some PE lessons than in some weaker lessons that chief inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw highlighted.

He said: "Generally, PE in our schools is in good health, but there are some issues the report highlights as areas for improvement. In particular, we found there often wasn't enough physical, strenuous activity in PE lessons.

"Some teachers talked for too long and pupils were not provided with enough activity to enable them to learn or practise their skills.

"In many of the schools visited, the more able pupils were not challenged sufficiently because teachers' expectations of them were too low.

"Schools with the best PE provision enabled pupils to achieve well by providing an ever increasing range of extra-curricular and traditional activities."

Expert analysis: The BBC's Dan Roan explains why cutting a key partnership with secondary school PE teachers has left primary school sport lagging behind

The report added: "In weaker lessons, pupils were not challenged to warm up vigorously or build stamina and strength by participating in sustained periods of physical activity.

"They were often prevented from exercising for extended periods because teachers interrupted their learning or took too long to introduce new tasks."

The report also found very few schools had adapted PE programmes to deal with the needs of overweight and obese pupils.

A Department for Education spokesman said: "We want all children to be given the opportunities they need to be fit and healthy. The draft PE curriculum published last week is designed to put competitive sport back at the heart of school life and end the damaging 'prizes for all' culture.

'Teacher training'

"We are also extending the School Games and spending £1bn on youth sport over the next five years.

"In addition we are working across government on a range of measures to improve PE and school sport as part of the Olympic and Paralympic legacy and will make an announcement in due course."

Shadow schools minister Kevin Brennan said: "As leading sports personalities have warned, under this government the Olympic legacy is at risk.

"Ministers must restore the requirement that pupils do a minimum of two hours of PE a week - the numbers of pupils doing two hours of sport has collapsed from 90% under Labour to 50% now."

But the DfE said: "The two-hour target was never a rule - it was an unenforceable aspiration that schools were free to ignore. We are freeing teachers from such unnecessary targets and paperwork which take up too much time better used in the classroom or at the running track."

Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: "Sport in schools is fit and healthy and beating its own records. Delivering two hours of PE a week in today's packed curriculum is a fantastic achievement."


Baroness Sue Campbell, chairman of the Youth Sports' Trust, said it was worrying that fewer primary schools are achieving outstanding PE than their secondary counterparts.

"From our own research we know that primary school teachers are not receiving adequate training in how to deliver an effective PE experience and this can leave teachers lacking the confidence and competence to deliver the subject effectively."

National Union of Teachers' general secretary Christine Blower said: "All the criticisms that Ofsted had of schools sports were being addressed by the Schools Sports Partnership.

"This was specialist PE teachers working across primary schools to add capacity and bring high quality, specialist, exciting teaching to children. It has been all but shut down by the coalition government."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 627.

    I wasn't particularly sporty at school but I learned to enjoy it, plus it was a good break away from the classroom!

    Two 40min PE sessions and one afternoon games session per week.

    But our school had grass playing fields, swimming pool, tennis courts, sports hall (badminton/basketball/squash), astroturf pitches.

    That's why sport was so easy to do... you provide the facilities and it will happen

  • rate this

    Comment number 575.

    Fine for those who are good at sport; for me school sport meant misery and a life-long hatred of sport- especially soccer! I enjoyed cross-country running as long as it was not competitive - I'm just not a competitive person and I am sure I am not alone.

  • rate this

    Comment number 455.

    Forget competative sport, it just means lots of kids left out. Do things like aeorobics and circuit training where everone can get involved.
    My school pe was all football and such, with half the kids doing nothing, getting bored and being put off sports completely.

  • rate this

    Comment number 207.

    What person can honestly say that they wanted more strenious PE lessons when they were at school?

    I'm sure there may be a few but I doubt if they are in the majority

  • rate this

    Comment number 81.

    There is a difference between organised "sport" and "fitness".

    Not everybody is good at "sport", equally, many are simply not interested, and why should they be?

    Fitness is another thing altogether. Children who are no good at sport, or couldn't care less about it, should be made to do some kind of physical activity (drill? just running round the field?) for the duration of the lesson.


Comments 5 of 11


More Education & Family stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.