Academies could 'fuel social segregation'

 
pupils There are now more than 2,300 academies in England, government data shows

The rising number of schools in England with academy status could fuel rather than improve social segregation, says a report by the Academies Commission.

The report says some academies may "covertly" select pupils by using extra information on families or holding social events with prospective parents.

The commission says academies should publish socio-economic data about who applies and who is offered a place.

Academies are independent school which are funded by the state.

In its report - Unleashing Greatness - the Academies Commission says it has received evidence that some popular schools, including academies, attempt to select and exclude pupils.

It says that, while this practice is not new, the fact that academies have greater autonomy over their admissions has "attracted controversy and fuelled concerns that the growth of academies may entrench rather than mitigate social inequalities".

ANALYSIS

This report is a detailed overview of one of the biggest structural changes to England's education system in recent times.

The shift towards more schools becoming academies, the review says, has come at an 'astonishing speed' since the coalition came to power and 'the scale and speed of change has been huge',

Half of England's secondary schools are now academies, although only 5% of primaries are.

The review panel drew together recent research on academies as well as views of various people and groups.

It's aim, it says, was not to discuss the decision to develop the academies programme - which has been controversial - but to look to the future to suggest ways of improving it.

Its key recommendations, about boosting accountability and standardising the rules on who schools can admit and how parents can get redress if their children are turned away, are being keenly read by all sides of the debate, with each finding elements to support their views.

All state schools must abide by an admissions code, which obliges them to admit pupils in a fair way.

But the commission says it has received numerous submissions suggesting "academies are finding methods to select covertly".

The admissions code says that schools cannot interview children or parents, or give priority to children whose parents offer financial or practical support.

"Some witnesses suggested to the commission that schools, including academies, have ways to get around this, such as by holding 'social' events with prospective parents or pre-admission meetings."

'Game-playing'

The report says the rise in the number of academies - 2,309 at the start of this academic year, up from 203 in May 2010 - could see further admissions injustices.

"As the pace and scale of academisation lead to a rapid rise in the number of schools that are their own admission authorities, there is a risk that admissions 'game-playing' may be extended further.

"The current emphases on choice and diversity may go some way to improving the school system in England, but they are likely to hit a ceiling because of the lack of engagement with (or even negative impact on) disadvantaged families."

Start Quote

Each academy should publish comprehensive data, including socio-economic data, about who applies to it and who is admitted”

End Quote Academies Commission

The commission calls on the Education Secretary, Michael Gove, to develop a system for admissions which allows parents "some independent recourse in terms of their relationship with an individual school, or each academy trust, acting as its own admissions authority".

"This is particularly important in terms of appeals," it says.

The report also recommends school data on admissions to be made widely available and analysed by the Office of the Schools Adjudicator (OSA) to identify any segregation.

"In the interests of demonstrating fairness and accessibility, the commission believes that each academy should publish comprehensive data, including socio-economic data, about who applies to it and who is admitted. "

A spokesman for the Department for Education said: "All admissions authorities - be they local councils or self-governing schools including academies - must comply with our new fair admissions code.

"We specifically changed the law so that anyone who has concerns about how any state-funded school is admitting pupils can formally object to the OSA."

Governors

The Academies Commission report also suggests the role of school governors in academies is becoming even more important and needs "greater attention".

"The commission's evidence gathering suggests there needs to be a radical shift in their capacity, knowledge and attitude if they are to take on both the leadership role expected in an academised system and fulfil their legal responsibilities as directors of charitable companies."

The report also says the recruitment of chairs of governors need to be "far more professional and rigorous", with positions being advertised.

Michael Gove The commission calls on Mr Gove to give parents help in appealing against an academy's admission decision

The commission also says no school should be judged outstanding for leadership unless it can provide evidence of its contribution to system-wide improvement, such as support for the improvement of another local school.

Chair of the commission and former Ofsted chief inspector Christine Gilbert said: "Academisation alone cannot bear the burden of improvement.

"There has to be enough support and challenge in the system, and enough checks and balances, for academies or groups of academies to be able to use the independence they have gained professionally and with moral purpose. "

Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg said: "This report highlights serious problems with Michael Gove's management of one of Labour's key school improvement programmes.

"The report issues a clear warning on the implementation of the academies policy, echoing Labour's concerns that under this government the schools system is becoming chaotic, impacting on standards and fairness."

What are Academies?

  • Academies are independent, state-funded schools, which receive their funding directly from central government
  • They were originally brought in by Labour in a bid to improve struggling schools, primarily in deprived areas.
  • The policy has been altered and accelerated by the coalition government
  • All primary and secondary schools are now invited to convert to academy status, but priority is given to those deemed by watchdog Ofsted to be "outstanding" or "performing well"
  • Education Secretary Michael Gove says academies will drive up standards by putting more power in the hands of head teachers
  • There were 2,456 academies open in England, as of November 2012
  • The number has grown dramatically under the coalition government, from 203 in May 2010

Academies are independent, state-funded schools, which receive their funding directly from central government, rather than through a local authority.

They have more freedom than other state schools over their finances, curriculum, length of terms and school days and do not need to follow national pay and conditions for teachers.

Academies were first set up under Tony Blair's Labour government, with the aim of raising standards in under-performing schools in disadvantaged areas.

However, the coalition government extended the programme in 2010 to allow good and outstanding state schools to convert to academy status.

The Academies Commission was set up by the Pearson Think Tank and the RSA charity to examine the implications of the "mass academisation" of state schools.

 

More on This Story

Academies and free schools

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +27

    Comment number 18.

    Segregation was always the plan for these schools that was obvious from day one.

  • rate this
    +41

    Comment number 17.

    Nosh it Sherlock!

    Permitting (more) faith-based schools and foreign-language schools was a dark day for our country and a bright one for those few who can afford to profit from communitarian bickering.

  • rate this
    +16

    Comment number 16.

    Before Tony Crosland destroyed the UK education system a lot of people from ordinary backgrounds (like me) went to state grammar schools and on to Oxford or Cambridge. However, the Secondary Moderns were no failures either as many of my friends went to them and had very successful carreers. The massive faceless comprehensives dragged those at the top down and we have seen the results.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 15.

    What did you expect,Cameron is a politician if his lips are moving he's lying.

  • rate this
    +20

    Comment number 14.

    Michael Gove worries me alot

  • rate this
    +16

    Comment number 13.

    Maybe these schools want to keep out the children whose families will not support their child's education, are happy to tolerate antisocial behaviour, will disrupt classes, threaten teachers, bully and make school a miserable experience for the majority?

    Seems reasonable to me

  • rate this
    +42

    Comment number 12.

    Religious selection should be stopped (indeed it was a Coalition pledge was to reduce it) yet Churches can establish VC schools with 100 faith admissions then convert to Academies with the same admissions criteria.

  • Comment number 11.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +43

    Comment number 10.

    I'm SO pleased to see that someone has highlighted this issue in a report (not that I suspect Gove etc will take the blindest bit of notice). I work in education, in the local authority, and watching the schools splinter away into their own little worlds has been a grave cause of concern ever since the academies expansion was announced. NOTHING about the new policies promotes cohesion

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 9.

    Someone's kids didn't get in and now there is 'social segregation'.

    The real problem is social engineering. Leave it alone you horrible do-gooders. Stop trying to ruin absolutely everything with PC.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 8.

    So they pick the best pupils.
    Really... what did the politicians think would happen?
    Targets create market conditions for the brightest pupils.
    You can't create such market place then complain when it duly operates as such.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 7.

    This will be music to the ears of this divide & rule govt - that is exactly what they want.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 6.

    This government thrives on social segregation. It doesn't want Jamie and Sophie to have to rub shoulders will those "awful plebs".

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 5.

    Segregation is pretty much the norm in Bradford where i live (on race lines and supported by our council). Segregation of those who can travel or live in a good area and those who cannot travel or live in a good area means that we have already sewn the seeds of another failing group of Children who will become dependent on Welfare and turn to crime. Well done Gove and co.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 4.

    Near me it is the opposite. The new academy admits on the criteria of distance to school, and it is situated in a very challenged area. If we end up with more schools that people want to fight to get their kids into then that's a good thing. It is important though that people do keep an eye that this does play out fair. This would be news if it WAS happening, not that it COULD happen.

  • rate this
    +29

    Comment number 3.

    In my local area, one Academy has decided to implement its own admission test, so children will have to do the 11 plus as well as this Academy's test if they want to get into this school. Children living nearby will have no guarantee of gaining a place. The county council which is still responsible for education seems powerless to make sure that fairness and equity is retained.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 2.

    Schools should concentrate on education not social engineering.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1.

    I see (yet again) that Labour are seizing on this report to go on the attack/blame of the Government.

    Just remind me again exactly which Government introduced these Academies ?

    Another day – another round of Labour hypocrisy and selective loss of memory.

 

Page 27 of 27

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.