Tougher A-levels to allow fewer re-takes

 
A-level exams The exam watchdog is announcing an overhaul to make A-levels more challenging

Related Stories

A-levels should be strengthened by only allowing one re-sit, replacing "modules" with end-of-year exams and increasing university involvement, says the exam watchdog, Ofqual.

Ofqual chief, Glenys Stacey, says too many re-sits by pupils can "devalue individual exams".

There are also questions over whether AS-levels should be scrapped.

The A-level reforms will mean "higher education becomes more involved", says Ms Stacey.

Ofqual is setting out proposals on changes to A-levels, which will be open for consultation for three months.

If the proposals are adopted, the first changes would be applied to A-level courses beginning in September 2013 - with pupils taking reformed exams in summer 2015.

Changes to content would be introduced from September 2014.

'Gold standard'

This "gold standard" qualification is taken by pupils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The exam watchdog is suggesting a shift away from a "modular" structure - and a reduction in the opportunities for pupils to keep re-taking exam components to push up their grades.

A-LEVEL REFORM PROPOSALS

  • Fewer re-sits - with option of only allowing a single re-take
  • Less modular structure - move towards traditional linear course, ending in summer exams
  • Question mark over future of AS-levels
  • If AS-levels scrapped, would return to two-year A-level, assessed by final exam
  • Greater involvement from universities in designing courses
  • If proposals accepted, changes introduced from courses beginning September 2013

The proposals call for an end of the January exams and puts forward the option of only allowing one re-take for AS and final A-level exams.

This would mean that there would only be one set of exams each year, in the summer term at the end of each of the two years.

Ms Stacey says this would "re-balance the emphasis of A-levels onto the learning rather than the assessment".

The role of AS-levels remains open to debate - with questions raised about whether they should continue in their current form.

Ofqual says it is "neutral" on the future of AS-levels and sets out three options - scrapping them altogether, keeping them in their current form or turning them into a standalone qualification which did not contribute to the A-level.

If AS-levels were to be scrapped, it would mean A-levels returning to a two-year course with a final set of summer exams.

Degree ready

Brian Lightman, leader of the ASCL head teachers' union, called for more debate about the value of the modular structure.

"It is simplistic to say that a course done in modules is easier than one with terminal exams. Nearly all university courses are modular and I have yet to hear criticism that they aren't rigorous enough," said Mr Lightman.

Education Secretary Michael Gove wrote to Ms Stacey earlier this year, calling for universities to become more involved in A-levels, so they could better prepare students for degree courses.

The proposals set out by Ofqual say that universities should be engaged in the content and design of A-levels - and that the qualifications should have the support of at least 20 universities.

Responding to the changes, the Russell Group of leading universities said that A-levels were "broadly fit for purpose" - but the changes would be beneficial.

Wendy Piatt, the group's director general, said the culture of re-sits was fuelling "grade inflation" - and so supported limits on re-taking exams.

She also supported a move away from a modular approach to teaching and testing - saying that pupils could arrive at university still expecting to be "spoon fed".

The Russell Group has also voiced concerns about the lack of rigour in some subjects, such as maths and English.

Pam Tatlow, chief executive of the Million+ group of universities, said that the level of engagement in A-levels expected of universities would require a "co-ordinating body".

Ms Tatlow also said that the qualification would lose credibility if approval was limited to only a "small sub-set" of universities.

Neil Carberry of the CBI said that employers would also want to see their needs reflected in changes.

"The focus needs to be on making A-levels more challenging, to ensure that young people are not just better prepared for university, but are also well-equipped for work."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 146.

    When I did A-Levels (2002) I thought they were important.
    When I did my (Maths) degree I thought it was important (and did poorly ish).
    I then got a job that required neither A-Levels nor a degree specifically and am enjoying my career climbing my company's ladder. My advice is don't believe the hype, you can have a successful career once you've finished collecting bits of paper to shred.

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 132.

    I think this is a good idea, especially when many colleges abuse the current system to improve their retention stats. Our local A level provider actively encourages students to leave if their AS levels are below a C grade as they assume that their overall grade would be to. A Levels are a joke and with so many alternatives the should be reviewed an revamped or scrapped.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 105.

    Would it matter if they were getting easier? They serve as a means to roughly compare candidates who sat the same/similar exams fairly recently, for jobs as well as university places. Although A-level results are an important benchmark for younger people, having sat my A-levels 10 years ago I find employers are no longer interested in my A-level results. Rather what I have achieved more recently.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 103.

    I was only able to go to university through doing resits of individual modules around 2006 as I had awful A/AS level results. But I scraped through and then went on to achieve a 1st in my degree, followed by a masters, followed by entry into the industry of my degree/masters.

    There is no way I can support this proposal.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 100.

    I am a current A2 student. Unless universities lower their grade boundaries to compensate for this proposed change then they will suffer from under subscription. The main reason for resits is to push your grade up to get into the AAB courses. Exams are difficult enough on their own but to put them all into one final exam where a massive range of question can be asked is surely asking too much?

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.