Teachers' unions urge rethink of phonics checks

Teacher and pupil Teachers' unions want the government to rethink its controversial phonics checks for six-year olds

Related Stories

Leaders of three teachers' unions have written to MPs urging a rethink of the phonics checks for six-year olds in England's schools.

The unions say the controversial tests are an expensive way to tell schools what they already know and will do nothing to improve children's reading.

They describe the checks on how well children can read both real and made-up words as "flawed".

Schools Minister Nick Gibb called the unions' position disappointing.

Mr Gibb said: "Many of their members have already told us how this quick check will allow them to identify thousands of children who need extra help to become good readers.

But in a joint briefing note to MPs the leaders of the National Union of Teachers, the Association of Teachers and Lecturers and the National Association of Head Teachers voiced their concerns about the checks.

'Zog' and vot'

All Year 1 children (five and six-year-olds) will be asked to read 20 words and 20 "made-up words" such as "zog" or "vot" to their teachers on a one-to-one basis.

The checks are expected to take five to 10 minutes.

The aim is to measure whether pupils have a good understanding of phonics - the sounds of letters and groups of letters - which the government says is the key to helping children to read.

The government has asked teachers to feed the results back to parents before the end of term.

The unions say the use of made-up words will frustrate confident readers and confuse children for whom English is a second language or who have special educational needs.

They also voice concerns that the checks risk making young children feel like failures, pointing out that in the pilots only 33% of children reached the expected standard.

They say they do not object to the use of phonics which they view as an essential tool for teaching early literacy but say they are not the only method of teaching children to read.

Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers said: "Once again the government is totally failing to understand how children learn - phonics checks for six-year-olds risk doing more damage than good."

Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers said the test risked "distorting teaching".

Chrstine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers said the message to the government from professionals was "that they want freedom to adopt whatever method best suits their children and not be pushed down a one-size-fits-all route."

'Informal experience'

The teachers' unions warn that they may refuse to take part in the 2013 checks.

The Department for Education said the assessments were designed to be an informal experience for children, raise expectations in schools and give parents and teachers valuable information about progress.

Mr Gibb added: "There is a weight of international evidence which demonstrates that phonics is the most effective way of teaching early reading. It is crucial for children to master the basics of reading as early as possible so they can go on to develop a real love of reading.

"Parents want to know exactly how well their children are performing and, if they need help, what their teachers are doing to provide it. This check will help teachers to keep parents fully informed."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 186.

    About 20 years ago my then 8 year old niece astounded the whole family by reading aloud (correctly) an entire article from the Sunday Times about Alexander Solzhenitsyn. She was taught to read using phonics.

  • rate this

    Comment number 182.

    It's important for all children to learn to read quickly in order to access the rest of the curriculum , and in order that children can read for meaning and pleasure themselves. Children cannot read for pleasure and meaning unless they can actually read. They can however have a harder book read to them by someone else. I support the government's emphasis on teaching systematic phonics.

  • rate this

    Comment number 170.

    Having seen phonics in action in the classroom I thought it was a nonsense that was damaging the ability of children to read. My instinct and observation was confirmed when I found a surprising lack of reading ability among the children. The best method for teaching a kid to read remains reading a book with them (both facing the book with the child doing their best to read the passage).

  • rate this

    Comment number 92.

    Thanks to my family I could read, tell the time, recite the multiplication tables and "reason" all before I started school. Illiteracy is a scourge to be eradicated. Can we please stop coming up with ever more fanciful reasons and excuses for why children don`t learn at school and focus all our attention on equipping them for "life", we are doing them no favours in pandering to them

  • rate this

    Comment number 89.

    Children spend alot of their education doing tests and preparing for tests, rather than actually learning something new.
    If children were regularly assesed by their teacher, then they wouldn't be under so much pressure and they would have more time to learn.


Comments 5 of 9


More Education & Family stories



  • A very clever little girlBrain gain

    Why are people getting better at intelligence tests?

  • BeefaloBeefalo hunt

    The hybrid animal causing havoc in the Grand Canyon

  • A British Rail signBringing back BR

    Would it be realistic to renationalise the railways?

  • Banksy image of girl letting go of heart-shaped balloonFrom the heart

    Fergal Keane on the relationship between love and politics

  • Don Roberto Placa Quiet Don

    The world's worst interview - with one of the loneliest men on Earth

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.