ASCL says opening free schools may be waste of money

 
School fence Mr Lightman fears free schools could send other local schools into a downward spiral

Related Stories

Opening free schools in England where they are not needed is a "shameful" waste of taxpayers' money, the leader of a head teachers' union has said.

In a speech on Saturday, Brian Lightman of the Association of School and College Leaders, also said free schools might damage existing schools.

"Such experimentation is deeply and unequivocally immoral," he told heads.

A government spokesman said free schools would give parents more choice of schooling for their children.

Free schools are funded from the public education budget, like other state schools, on a per-pupil basis.

However, they are run independently from local authority control by not-for-profit trusts, which can buy in private sector services.

In a speech to the union's annual conference, Mr Lightman said: "ASCL has no objection to new schools opening in areas where there is a shortage of school places but we cannot condone the creation of costly surplus places when other services are being cut."

Start Quote

Children are not guinea pigs in some educational lab”

End Quote Brian Lightman, General secretary, ASCL

The union suggests that free schools planned for Suffolk, Essex, Bristol and Teesside are all in areas where there are already surplus places. It is also concerned that free schools may receive more generous funding than other schools and accuses the government of being opaque when it comes to free school budgets.

Mr Lightman called on the government to publish spending figures for the next three years for each new free school.

'Downward spiral'

He said he wanted parents to be able to see how these figures compared with funding for other schools in their neighbourhoods.

And he suggested other nearby schools could be thrown into a downward spiral because of falling pupil numbers and lack of investment.

"Children are not guinea pigs in some educational lab. Schools that have been consigned to the dustbin of our education service in this way cannot be expected to create the conditions which enable them to raise standards.

Start Quote

We cannot continue with a system where thousands of parents are forced to send their child to a school that is either weak or simply isn't right for them”

End Quote Department for Education

"No-one in government should be contemplating standing by and watching as some schools fail in order to use it as a lever of change," he said.

Failing system

In a statement, the Department for Education (DfE) said: "We cannot continue with a system where thousands of parents are forced to send their child to a school that is either weak or simply isn't right for them.

"Our school reforms will help put this right by creating a system that works for - not against - parents, many of whom live in the poorest parts of the country."

The DfE said that free schools would cost a fraction of schools built under Labour's Building Schools for the Future programme.

Rachel Wolf, the director of the New Schools Network, which advises groups wishing to set up free schools, said what would be immoral would be to leave the school system in England as it was, because it was "letting down parents across the country".

"Most teachers care about pupils not politics and free schools gives them an opportunity to focus on what matters. Thousands of parents and teachers have supported Free Schools because they believe that every child - not just the wealthy - should be able to go to a good local school," she said.

"We need to stop defending the status quo and offer children something better."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -10

    Comment number 319.

    I'm all for this programme. Give is by far & away the best thing that has happened to schooling in this country in 40 years. However, the deeply entrenched client-state that is the current system will fight him all the way. The simple fact is that education in the UK is in an appalling state and we spiral downward year-on-year. Labour failed despite throwing money at the problem. This may work.

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 277.

    Of course teachers vary in their skills - and have 'of'f' days - who doesn't? In reality a truly incompetent teacher does not survive, as the school environment is just too hostile for those who are not on top of their game.

    A more common problem is control freak heads who use competency procedures against those who stand up to them - many of whom are excellent teachers.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 255.

    If our system of education was really good no-one would want to change it.The chattering classes and vested interests seem to want to have total control over society through the children.I taught for many years and experienced many lunatic schemes foisted on teachers and pupils.Some loony ideas seem to pop up,then disappear when discredited,only to return in a modified form a few years later.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 248.

    Of course they are. We have finite resources, so the huge amounts going into tbese schools means less somewhere else. The best provider of education should provide all education, whoever that is. Anything else breeds division and elitism. No postcode lottery in education please.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 244.

    Mr Gove is sadly ignorant of what the mechanics of education are actually like. As with all things, there are peaks and troughs- a century after compulsory free education, the state machine is understandably gobbling funds due to its size- the same as the NHS - ideals cost money and a world-beating anything costs money - free schools are just manoeuvring the same cash. They won't help; may hinder.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.