Schools minister cracks down on league table 'incentives'
The new figures will highlight how students fared from age 11 to 16
Schools minister Nick Gibb has said he wants to stop schools prioritising their rankings in exam league tables over ensuring a good education for all their pupils.
New league tables for England, out next week, show which schools boost pupils' progress from ages 11 and 16.
Mr Gibb said the old system allowed schools to exploit tables, and some used it to help boost their rankings.
Labour gave the move a cautious welcome.
'Incentivise schools'Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Mr Gibb explained: "The purpose of performance tables must be to incentivise schools to raise standards and to enable parents to make informed decisions when choosing a school."
But he added: "The way school league tables have evolved over the past two decades can encourage a degree of 'gaming' by some weaker schools, desperate to keep above the standard that would trigger intervention by Ofsted or the Department for Education."
Mr Gibb says some schools have been able to abuse the system
Mr Gibb said that, since 1997, the number of C grades awarded had increased because weaker schools had been incentivised to focus on them.
He said this meant students who could have gained As were getting Bs, and E-grade students who were capable of achieving Ds had been neglected.
"We intend to make available data formerly kept secret in the Department for Education," Mr Gibb wrote.
"For example, we want to show how well secondary schools educate those children who left primary school still struggling in the 3Rs.
"The new tables will have a column showing the proportion of such children who went on to achieve five or more GCSEs at grades A* to C. We can then compare schools to see which are better at helping children who started from this low base."
“Start Quote
End Quote Stephen Twigg Shadow education secretaryIt remains to be seen whether this will amount to real reform”
The figures will also highlight how well a secondary school educates those students who joined them as high achievers and will show how well schools improve the chances of pupils who have come from poorer backgrounds, Mr Gibb said.
Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg said: "Labour introduced value added measures in league tables to measure how schools helped children improve, which the Tory government scrapped. It is good that they have changed their minds so we can measure the progress pupils make not just the raw exam results.
"Labour has been saying for some time that the Tory-led government needs to take stock of research evidence and advice from experts carefully and deal with coasting schools and poor teaching. Although today's news makes a good headline, it remains to be seen whether this will amount to real reform."
Last year the league tables were overhauled to show results in the English Baccalaureate - or EBacc - which records achievement in five core subjects.
Last year the government said it would consider the value of vocational qualifications in performance measures.
Known as equivalent qualifications, some of these count for as much as four or even six GCSEs. The government said there were "perverse incentives" for schools to offer them and thereby boost their league table position.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~05~RS~)


Degree courses 'cut by a quarter'
Obama apology for Koran burnings
La vida simple
Render unto Caesar
Race to the bottom
Fight for freedom
Living in...Boston
Fast Track
Comment number 166.
ShrimpinaKilt21st January 2012 - 18:21
My daughter wanted to take a vocational path but this was blocked at every turn by her school. When it then became clear that her results were unlikely to reach the required A-C, they stopped taking any interest in her, and were pleased as punch when she left after Christmas.
League Tables are a wholly useless way of judging how well a school is serving ALL its pupils.
Link to this (Comment number 166)
Comment number 141.
mathsman21st January 2012 - 17:08
I've long argued that 'success' should be measured not by the end result but by the progress made made each and every pupil. Counting the number of A*-Cs is pointless. A pupil who doesn't not gain the 'required'grade C or above is NOT a failure if he/she started Secondary school from a low base but made fantastic progress. There needs to be a systematic method of measuring progress.
Link to this (Comment number 141)
Comment number 77.
Bradford21st January 2012 - 14:04
League tables were introduced to raise standards but by focussing on exam results gears schools to turn out lots of children who are reasonably good at passing exams. This cannot be right.
The simple truth is schools do not turn out children who are prepared for responsible citizenship or useful to the workplace.
The balance is wrong, children expect & have rights, it needs redressing.
Link to this (Comment number 77)
Comment number 27.
Saint_In_Staffordshire21st January 2012 - 12:42
As a teacher I've a vested interest but I'll say this, as long as schools are judged on their A*-C results the focus will remain solely on how the system can be worked to produced the best results.
The huge downsides to this is teaching to assessment, only entering kids who will pass at the expense of others and choosing poor courses due to their weighted value.
Link to this (Comment number 27)
Comment number 21.
madhatter21st January 2012 - 12:35
Schools are damed if they do well in league tables and damded if they don't.
Of course teachers teach to the tests, schools who don't do well in the league tables are seen as "satisfactory" which now means badly.
Now when pupils fail we can sack teachers within a term.
Link to this (Comment number 21)
Comments 5 of 6