Ofsted plans to scrap 'satisfactory' label for schools

 

Sir Michael Wilshaw: "This is about sending the message out that we want all our schools to be good schools"

Related Stories

Education watchdog Ofsted wants to toughen the language of inspections in England - changing the "satisfactory" rating to "requires improvement".

Ofsted's chief inspector, Sir Michael Wilshaw, wants to send a message that "satisfactory" is now unsatisfactory and that more schools should be pushing for the higher rating of "good".

This is the latest attempt to improve schools which are seen as "coasting".

The National Union of Teachers criticised such labels as "insulting".

But Prime Minister David Cameron said: "This is not some small bureaucratic change. It marks a massive shift in attitude. I don't want the word 'satisfactory' to exist in our education system. 'Just good enough' is frankly not good enough."

Sir Michael wants to see more schools progressing beyond the current category of "satisfactory", with the change in description intended to emphasise that these schools need to make improvements.

At present, inspectors can judge schools to be "inadequate", "satisfactory", "good" or "outstanding". Subject to consultation, the satisfactory grade will become "requires improvement".

'Coasting' schools

Schools will only be allowed to stay at the "requires improvement" level for three years - and there will be earlier re-inspections, after 12 to 18 months rather than three years, says Ofsted.

Start Quote

Of particular concern are the 3,000 schools educating a million children that have been 'satisfactory' two inspections in a row. This is not good enough”

End Quote Sir Michael Wilshaw Ofsted chief inspector

Sir Michael was speaking ahead of a Downing Street summit on so-called "coasting" schools - where performance, often in well-off areas, is not necessarily inadequate but has failed to impress.

"There are too many coasting schools not providing an acceptable standard of education," says Sir Michael.

"Of particular concern are the 3,000 schools educating a million children that have been 'satisfactory' two inspections in a row.

"This is not good enough. That is why I am determined to look again at the judgements we award, not only so we are accurately reporting what we see, but so that those schools that most need help are identified and can properly begin the process of improvement.

"I make no apology for making even greater demands of an education system which has to respond with greater urgency to increasingly difficult and competitive economic circumstances."

Prime Minister David Cameron, who hosted the summit, said: "To those who say that this will alienate some schools, I say we've got to stop making excuses and start doing what is best for our children: demanding excellence and confronting complacency wherever we find it."

'Derogatory'

But teachers' unions criticised the changes - with the NUT claiming that the re-labelled category would be used as a way of pressuring more schools into becoming academies.

Start Quote

The seemingly tough talk we have heard from the government today, may have popular appeal but the reality is that it has nothing to do with raising standards”

End Quote Chris Keates NASUWT teachers' union

"First we had 'underperforming' schools, now we have 'coasting' schools. Labelling schools in this way is derogatory and insulting to pupils, teachers, school leaders and governors," said NUT leader, Christine Blower.

"The government's real agenda behind this change is of course inventing yet another category of schools that it will then seek to force into academy status."

Chris Keates, head of the NASUWT teachers' union, attacked the proposals as "another crude ruse to enable the secretary of state to push more schools into the hands of profit making, private companies".

"The seemingly tough talk we have heard from the government today, may have popular appeal but the reality is that it has nothing to do with raising standards," she said.

"Instead, it is about ratcheting up pressure on schools, without providing the support and resources they need to assist them in securing further improvements.

"This announcement will encourage a culture of vicious management practices within schools which will have a profoundly negative effect on the workforce and children and young people alike."

Labour's shadow education secretary, Stephen Twigg, said coasting schools "need more than just a new label" and criticised the removal of routine inspections of outstanding schools.

"Outstanding schools can quickly slip back, so this measure could undermine confidence in the system and mean parents only get out of date information."

The change to the "satisfactory" category was welcomed by the RSA think tank, which warned about such schools "performing inconsistently".

"What needs to be addressed in particular is the variable quality of teaching. We need to find ways to incentivise the best teachers to join these schools and new ways of helping schools to improve," said the RSA's director of education, Becky Francis.

But head teachers warned that when it came to inconsistency it was Ofsted that needed to get "its own house in order".

"Inspections are too often at the whim of inspectors with little experience in the field they are inspecting and who have already made up their minds before they enter the school," said Russell Hobby, general secretary of the NAHT head teachers' union.

"Heads feel the results can be the luck of the draw. If inspections are getting more severe, then they need to be more consistent and of higher quality or there will be no justice in the findings."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +18

    Comment number 534.

    Once again the goalposts are moved.I taught for 35 years.In that time I was inspected several times, but the process and criteria were never the same in successive inspections, so comparisons from one to the next were virtually impossible.Add in changes to the curriculum, syllabuses and the structure of the exams and it is virtually impossible to make comparisons. Inspections are a costly farce.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 514.

    No other workers are subjected to as much observation, inspection, criticism, assessment or interference as teachers are. Every politcian newly appointed to the educuation portfolio,
    and ill informed pundit think they know more about teaching/learning than the professionals and feel free to take a swipe at them. Takes the pressure off them, I suspect.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 513.

    Ofsted as an organisation is largely counter productive. Schools are stigmatised for 3 years by a poor ofsted which starts a downward spiral of intake and funding which is difficult to stop. Ofsted should be drastically scaled down and only serve as a moderating body for the existing LA schools inspectorate who have a much closer knowledge of individual schools. This would be cheaper too!

  • rate this
    +14

    Comment number 494.

    Surveys have shown that many teachers are demoralised. Clearly, as any competent general knows, demoralised troops can not fight well. Simply beating them with a big stick may get them performing a bit harder in the short-term but causes a longer term loss of morale and more loss of performance. I believe that Wilshaw's approach may have some temporary gains, but will cause longer-term damage.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 484.

    I am a teacher in the South East and I work hard and plan lessons both thoroughly and in advance. I work in a good school and my students are generally good to work with. I would say that there are a number of teachers at the school who take their jobs far less seriously. I've witnessed some terrible lesson planning and a lot of video watching. I agree that standards need to rise dramatically!

 

Comments 5 of 21

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

  • Man with typewriterLove to Patrick

    The official whose over-familiar letters infuriated his boss


  • Man's hands putting ring on woman's fingerName changer

    Why do wives take a man's name after marriage?


  • Person scratching their arm10 things

    Scratching really does make things itch, and other nuggets


  • Corsican flagCorsican mafia

    Are Corsica's days of mafia and militants over?


  • Mobil canopies on the A6 at Red Hill, LeicestershireEnglish heritage

    Zebra crossings to bus stations: unusual listed buildings


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.