School odds stacked against summer babies, says IFS

Summer skies Summer skies - but the long-term outlook at school is less favourable for children born in August

Related Stories

Children born in the summer in England are at an academic disadvantage throughout school, says a report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

The study says that among seven-year-olds, August-born children are more than three times as likely to be "below average" as September-born children.

August children are also 20% less likely to attend a top university.

The IFS says the economic consequences facing summer babies will last "throughout their working lives".

The report from the independent financial researchers shows the sharp difference in outcomes between the youngest children in a year group - those born in August - and the oldest, born in September.

Less confidence

Researchers say that August-born seven-year-olds are between 2.5 and 3.5 times "more likely to be regarded as below average by their teachers in reading, writing and maths".

They are also 2.5 times more likely to be unhappy at school at the age of seven and at an increased risk of being bullied.

Start Quote

This suggests that August-born children may end up doing worse than September-born children throughout their working lives”

End Quote Claire Crawford IFS report co-author

This reflects that these August children can be almost a year younger than their September-born classmates.

This achievement gap has not been closed by the time youngsters are ready to leave secondary schools - with August-born teenagers 20% more likely to be in vocational rather than academic study after school.

They are also 20% less likely to be at a leading Russell Group university compared with a September-born teenager.

These August children are likely to have lower confidence and less likely to feel they "control their own destiny".

This accident of birth can have far-reaching economic significance, says the IFS, as underachievement in qualifications at school will be likely to reduce employment opportunities in adulthood.

"This suggests that August-born children may end up doing worse than September-born children throughout their working lives, simply because of the month in which they were born," says IFS programme director Claire Crawford.

This research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, is intended as a step towards finding a way of tackling the disadvantages of being the youngest in a year group.

The rules for beginning school mean that a child reaches compulsory school age at the beginning of the term following their fifth birthday.

However it is usual to start school in the September after a child's fourth birthday, which means that August babies would only just have reached the age of four when they enter the reception class.

But parents should have a choice about whether a child is full-time or part-time and there should be the option to defer entry until later in the school year.

"Parents now have the choice of a place in reception classes from the September following a child's fourth birthday, so that their child is ready to start school," said a Department for Education spokesman.

"If parents choose to defer entry, they can continue to access their entitlement to 15 hours of free early education in a setting of their choice."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 473.

    My summer born child was only just out of nappies when he started school. He'd only just learnt to walk. He wasn't disabled, just not ready. He was academically ready, already starting to write and reading simple words. You cannot rush a child physically no matter how hard you try.

  • rate this

    Comment number 395.

    I think that this is rubbish. My daughter is 17 and was born in August. She started school in the September after her fourth birthday because she was ready, she could read and write because we had taken the time to teach her. She is an only child and welcomed the stimulation of the school enviroment. Her educational standing is far above her peers who are almost a year older than her.

  • rate this

    Comment number 385.

    I am late summer and was always young in my year. I don't think it impacted academically but it did in terms of social and emotional challenge especially at those key moments of change. I was a year younger than some yet facing the same things. I have never thought about it before today but some things suddenly make a lot of sense.

  • rate this

    Comment number 361.

    I was born in August - I took some O level's / GCSE's a year early at 14 - I did not think anything of it - I now see my own daughter born in the summer months- a year younger than some in her class both academically / and emotionally I wonder - will she catch up like I did ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 359.

    My birthday is in June and, yes, I did feel a sense of inadequacy at primary school. I also was bullied, but that was due to others’ jealousy of not being as bright as me. Now I am one of a few of my old schoolmates to have a degree from a top university, and the only one to have his own flat in London and own Mercedes before reaching 30. Success is due to your character, not when you were born.


Comments 5 of 18


More Education & Family stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.