Academies could give priority on places to poorest

Secondary school pupils One in seven pupils failed to get a place at their first choice of secondary school this year

Related Stories

Academies and free schools in England may be allowed to give priority to the poorest pupils when allocating places, under a new proposed admissions code.

The rules, published for consultation, also allow all schools to give priority to teachers' children.

The government said it wanted a simpler, fairer code and it would let good schools expand more easily.

But teaching unions warned the changes would "create another generation of haves and have-nots".

The admissions code covers entry to all state schools, most controversially, the basis on which places are allocated in popular, oversubscribed schools.

School admissions remain highly competitive in some areas, with one in seven pupils failing to get a place at their first choice of secondary school this year.

There are also concerns about a shortage of primary school places in the next few years in some areas, with London predicting a shortfall of about 70,000 over the next four years.

'Sharp-elbowed parents'

Education Secretary Michael Gove said the old code, which was 130 pages long, was "bureaucratic and unfair".

The new version is just 50 pages, and includes a range of changes he said would help "give all children the chance of world-class schools".

The proposals include:

  • Allow free schools set up by parents and community groups, and academies - state schools outside local authority control - to give priority to children eligible for free schools meals (those whose parents earn less than £16,000 a year)
  • Allow schools to give priority to the children of their own teachers and other staff, something which was stopped under Labour
  • Allow popular schools to expand without permission from local authorities or the education secretary
  • Allow primary schools to increase infant class sizes beyond 30 pupils in order to take in twins and children whose parents are serving in the armed forces
  • Remove the explicit ban on admissions authorities drawing catchment areas and selecting feeder schools in such as way as to disadvantage children from deprived areas
  • Ban local authorities from using area-wide lotteries
  • Alter the appeals process to make it "cheaper and less burdensome"
  • Improve the way places are allocated to children who move area in the middle of an academic year

Mr Gove says the existing system needed to change because it "rationed good schools" and with wealthier families able to go private or move house, "the poorest are often left with the worst schools".

"Good schools should be able to grow and we need more of them," he said, having argued earlier in the week that allowing popular schools to expand more easily would increase the amount of good school places.

Journalist Toby Young, who is setting up one of the first free schools, said he would want his governors to take advantage of the proposal to allow schools to set aside places for pupils on free school meals, if it is implemented.

He said the idea was welcome for free schools and academies that were "worried about places being monopolised by middle class children".

'Spiral of decline'

The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) said the proposals would not improve social mobility and would have a "damaging effect" on pupils from the most deprived areas.

In April, the coalition's "pupil premium" came into effect, under which schools receive an extra £430 per year for every pupil on free school meals that they teach.

ASCL general secretary Brian Lightman said this would "hardly be enough of an incentive or a supplement for schools to provide the additional support that these pupils so often need".

And allowing popular schools to expand would "create another generation of haves and have-nots".

"Those schools left with the most challenging pupils, who need the most intensive support, will suffer a slow spiral of decline and their pupils will lose out on life chances," he said.

And the NASUWT teaching union pointed out that the rules would allow grammar schools to expand without having to run local consultations.

"Forget about selection by the back door. This is selection by the front door," said general secretary Chris Keates.

Separately, the government said that it would, on a case by case basis, consider allowing free schools set up by parents to give priority to the children of those who founded them.

This is not included in the new code, but would be written into each school's funding agreement with the government.

'Reducing complexity'

Coalition ministers have long said they wanted to shorten and simplify the existing code.

Outgoing chief schools adjudicator, Ian Craig, said he was "pleased" at the publication of the new code.

"Reducing the complexity and making it easier for parents to understand without removing the safeguards for vulnerable groups is essential to our admissions system," he said.

He had warned in November that slimming down the code could risk "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" and reducing it to "a useless document".

The government is also altering the school admissions appeals process in the Education Bill currently before Parliament.

The Bill would limit the Office of the Schools Adjudicator to investigating specific complaints, rather than wider issues where it suspects there may be a problem.

The body would, however, be able to accept complaints from a wider range of people and its remit would be expanded to cover academies.

The government says this will reduce bureaucracy without affecting fairness, but Labour has warned that such changes could result in reduced scrutiny and an increase in "selection by the back door".


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 110.

    I was Chair of Govenors in a school which performed badly and we began to talk about improving standards and other measures. Many of the parents objected claiming that we were trying to turn it into a private school! Sadly many poorly educated parents do not value education and that is why they and they kids continue to suffer. I have moved my children to a high performing 'middle class' school.

  • rate this

    Comment number 103.

    As someone who works in the school system, seeing the effect that differing backgrounds & levels of parental interest have on a child's education, we do need to do more to encourage children who lack support at home, and to improve poor schools. However, no school that needs to improve will take on poor students if it affects them negatively. Change how we judge schools first.

  • rate this

    Comment number 73.

    It irks me when I hear things like this. Not because I think poorer pupils shouldn't get a chance but that the great middle class are always assumed to be doing well. The reality is that while poorer families get lots of help with benefit payments etc, for unemployement, rent and the like the middle classes have increasingly expensive mortgages to pay etc. These are not luxuries.

  • rate this

    Comment number 58.

    I don't really like the idea of pupils being given priority on a basis that isn't ability. Shouldn't the system be that rich or poor there are equal opportunities?

    Having recently been through a selective system, I don't understand why grammar schools aren't used all over the country. I had friends from all backgrounds, who were there on merit, all being challenged to perform to their potential.

  • rate this

    Comment number 51.

    I work in a difficult school with the majority of them from poor backgrounds, the school is in a cycle. The middle class families who have good support networks dont want to send their kids to our school (yet there is some of the best teaching going on i have ever seen - it needs to be). This then doesnt help riase the aspirations of the other kids who could do with it.
    I say make it a lottery


Comments 5 of 9


More Education & Family stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.