Heads vote for industrial action ballot over pensions

 
Primary school The NAHT union is strongest in primary schools

Related Stories

Head teachers have voted overwhelmingly to stage a ballot on whether to strike over planned changes to their pensions.

The move was backed by 99.6% of 350 delegates at the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) at their annual conference in Brighton.

Thousands of schools in England and Wales could be affected in what would be the union's first national strike.

The government is talking to unions and urging them not to pre-empt the release of its firm plans on state pensions.

That announcement is due in the autumn.

A review led by Lord Hutton called for final salary schemes to be replaced by those based on the average salary in a career and said public sector workers should retire later, in line with a rising state pension age.

The vote came shortly before Education Secretary Michael Gove addressed delegates at the conference.

He told heads that reform to pensions was necessary but that in government he would be a "champion and voice for education professionals".

He said tough decisions needed to made but he wanted to work with heads to get the best possible outcome.

'Real betrayal'

The NAHT is the third teaching union to vote to ballot its members on pensions.

The National Union of Teachers and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers passed similar resolutions in the past few weeks.

The heads plan to ballot in the autumn and any action would quickly follow but the teachers are likely to ballot this term.

Like other public sector workers, heads and teachers will pay increased pensions contributions from next April.

They say changes being proposed will mean they will have to work longer for less money and that, on average, a head teacher will lose about £100,000 from their pension.

Start Quote

They rightly see the proposals as an attack on the fair rewards from a lifetime of public service”

End Quote Russell Hobby General secretary, NAHT

Gail Larkin, the head of Auriol Junior School, in Epsom, Surrey, said: "We are already struggling trying to recruit good people and if they are not going to be rewarded with a really good pension, then I don't think they will want to do the job."

Other delegates told the conference the pension proposals would be "disastrous".

NAHT member Brian McNutt said the government's approach was "disaster politics" and that Chancellor George Osborne was from the "Arthur Daley school of economics".

David Fann, a member of the NAHT's national executive, said: "We're going to pay more, work longer and get less."

And Jan Williams, the head of a school for children with autism, said making heads work longer would put their health at risk.

She said teaching was a physically demanding role.

"What happens when we are 65? We will be putting ourselves at risk of serious injury because we should be retired?" she said.

The government has said it is considering the Hutton review findings and will bring out firm proposals for all public sector pensions in the autumn.

It aims to set out "general principles" for changes to teachers' pensions in England and Wales by the end of June.

Teachers' pensions in Scotland and Northern Ireland are decided by the national administrations and no plans to change them have been announced.

'Unspoken contract'

Mr Gove's speech to the heads came a short while after their vote and he began by thanking them for "doing so much to give children the best start in life".

He said they embodied the "spirit of public service" and that he appreciated the "huge pressures" they faced and the long hours they worked.

Start Quote

I will be a champion and voice for educational professions”

End Quote Michael Gove Education Secretary

But he said the government accepted the need to reform public sector pensions and difficult decisions would need to be taken.

However, he said there was an "unspoken contract" between the government and head teachers - who might have earned more with their skills in the private sector - and that their pensions were an acknowledgement and reward.

"In government, I will be a champion and voice for educational professions," he said, suggesting he would call on the Treasury to look at the specific situation of teachers and heads in making decisions on pensions .

Ahead of the vote Russell Hobby, general secretary of the NAHT - which has members in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - said heads felt angry and betrayed.

"They rightly see the proposals as an attack on the fair rewards from a lifetime of public service," he said.

"We are seeing a loss of about £100,000 from an average head teachers' pension. That feels like a real betrayal to the profession."

Afterwards, Mr Hobby said he had been encouraged by some of the comments Mr Gove had made.

"We welcomed the Secretary of State's engagement with the issues we have been fighting for - from Sats to pensions to salaries," he said.

"He walked into a heated debate on pensions but responded well."

The NAHT is strongest in primary schools - where it says it represents 85% of heads in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It says it represents 40% of secondary heads.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 57.

    The long holidays teachers get in a year make up for the 80 hours a week they work term time (at school and home marking)
    I'd have still aspired to be a teacher with the new pension proposals. What the government should not do is take away from people who have spent years relying on what they think they will have in old age. I'd be happy if the money saved went back into education, but it won't.

  • Comment number 54.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 52.

    I'd love for public sector workers to get better and better pensions. I just don't want to pay for them, as I'm struggling to pay for my own. They need to put their hands in their own pockets, the same as the rest of us do.

    If the perks are needed to retain them, I'd guess they have alternatives lined up. If they don't, they just need to accept the change we had to.

  • Comment number 39.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 35.

    @ Caledonia67

    We are not all bashing those in public service but having been in both camps I know which is most stressful and it is not the public service. In private industry you are only as good as your last figures and can be sacked anytime the firm want and you have to keep performing better and better. Having to meet sales targets each month is a lot harder and no guaranteed pension

 

Comments 5 of 12

 

More Education & Family stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.