Parents 'wrongly blamed for speech problems'
Long-term speech and language problems are wrongly being blamed on parents not talking to their children and too much television, research suggests.
A survey for the Communication Trust reveals common misconceptions about the cause of serious communication difficulties.
The charity says the exact cause of such problems is often unknown.
Parents know more about milestones in the development of walking than of talking, it adds.
The poll of 6,000 people, including 3,000 parents, was carried out to explore perceptions about children's speech and language development.
Speech and language problems
- 90% of children with identified speech and language needs have long term difficulties
- Problems understanding language are most likely to persist
- Children whose language difficulties are unresolved by the time they start school are more likely to have academic difficulties later
- 50-90% of children with persistent communication difficulties go on to have reading difficulties
- SOURCE: ICAN
It suggested half of parents thought serious communication difficulties were caused by parents not talking to their children enough.
One in six blamed excessive TV-watching or computer use.
However, one in five of those polled considered biological or genetic reasons as a possible cause of problems.
The research for government-backed charitable group the Communication Trust also suggested that one in three parents have had concerns about their children's speech and language development.
It is being published to launch the group's year-long "Hello" campaign to improve services for children with speech and language problems. The group of 40 bodies involved in tackling communication problems is working to improve access to specialist help and support.
“Start Quote
End Quote Jean Gross Communication championThe automatic response seems to be to blame parents or technology”
The survey also revealed that many people know little about the talking milestones a child should reach.
Just one in four parents (25%) knew that on average, babies say their first word at between 12 and 18 months, while almost a third (31%) expected it to be at six to eight months.
England's communication tsar Jean Gross said the public understanding of children's communication difficulties remained worryingly low.
"The automatic response seems to be to blame parents or technology.
"This just isn't right. We need to clear up the confusion and myths that exist around the subject."
"Ten per cent of children, that's two to three in every classroom, have some form of long term communication difficulty that can affect them early, severely and for life.
"Their brains don't process language in quite the same way that other children's brains do."
She added: "For every child it is great for parents to talk to them and for the TV to be turned off for part of the time, but we should not be blaming parents for this big group of children's problems - these are based on biological difficulties."
There were two groups of children, she explained, those with communication problems based on the way they had been nurtured and those based on nature.
The survey was carried out for the Communication Trust on 19 and 20 January online by polling organisation One Poll.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~19~RS~)


Minister heckled by head teachers
Thousands rally to oppose Italy cuts
Patience of Job
Tweets of the week
Clocking out
Most wanted
Story of the S-Class
Fast Track
Comment number 7.
DDoot27th February 2013 - 7:22
My children both said their first 'words' at 10 months, but then neither of them ever had a dummy.
Link to this (Comment number 7)
Comment number 6.
Trevor Martin26th February 2013 - 14:16
Yeah no the overall standard of language is falling anyway, so why worry.
Link to this (Comment number 6)
Comment number 5.
jeffrey26th February 2013 - 12:56
"common misconceptions" is not a nice way to speak of creating babies.
Link to this (Comment number 5)
Comment number 4.
KickAssAndGiggle26th February 2013 - 12:29
What evidence are they using to prove it ISN'T parents not talking to kids enough?
My empirical evidence tells me it IS, so I am curious?
Rather worrying that the people "tasked" with looking at this seem to come to a conclusion that a few weeks of volunteering in a school (as my wife does) would tell them is shaky...
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 3.
Mandy26th February 2013 - 8:47
There is often an inability in adults to recognise infants' speech as such. This ranges from the simplest level of failing to respond to "Pee-pee, Mum-mum!" to denouncing the child's fully-articulated sentence such as "I dus dot bit by a wed back pider" as "babbling". When this occurs, the failure of the adult to respond appropriately to the toddler's communication can cause real grief.
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comments 5 of 7