An intriguing set of responses from opposition parties in the Holyrood chamber this afternoon to John Swinney's final budget proposals - intriguing not because of their similarity but because of their mutual differences.
Mr Swinney is adamant that he has done the best with limited resources, emphasising capital expenditure, providing extra money to limit the cuts in housing and reversing to some degree the extent of the cuts faced by colleges.
She was there, she said, "to discuss an RBS banker who enjoyed huge success but whose arrogance drove him to over-reach himself and lead Scotland to disaster".
Cue wry grin from Johann Lamont. Her intention, she clarified, was not to focus upon the former Royal Bank economist before her (Salmond, A., FM) but rather the former boss of the bank (Goodwin, F., ex knight.)
These are different times, are they not? Dundee United are still the finest team on the planet but, otherwise, things are not as they were.
En passant, forgive me but writing that opening phrase has suddenly recalled for me a lyric by Lou Reed. From Sweet Jane, I think? An instant memory of university days - distinctly different times.
An interesting speech from Ed Miliband in Glasgow today - and one in which he attempts to engage with the fundamental core of the constitutional debate in Scotland.
He could have talked about the currency. He could have talked about defence. These topics have formed the core of the Unionist campaign against independence over the past couple of weeks - and, it seems likely, will feature predominantly up to the autumn of 2014.
We do not yet have the rules and regulations which will govern the independence referendum, but it would appear that we have a pretty fair indication of the shape of the campaign.
Indeed, both sides were rehearsing their arguments at Holyrood today.
A remarkable day. Do forgive me for being a mite tardy with the blog. Things to do, people to see - including the First Minister, both at Holyrood and later at Edinburgh Castle.
So where are we now? We have Alex Salmond's proposed question - "do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?"
Down the decades, there have been sundry attempts to define "Britishness". Many foundered from being too imprecise, too inchoate.
For example, they were based upon common concepts such as "justice" and "fair play" as if these were, in some way, uniquely British and not to be found in, say, France or New Zealand.
A disparate display of tone in the Holyrood debate on the independence referendum: both conciliatory and crushing at one and the same time.
The conciliation came in repeated emphasis from the first minister that he would involve other parties - and, of course, the people of Scotland - in his consultation document, due to be unleashed within a fortnight.
To every thing its season - and tonight the First Minister has named the season for his planned independence referendum.
Alex Salmond wants the ballot to take place in the autumn of 2014. (This news, incidentally, was first broadcast on BBC Scotland. Thought you should know.)
As billed on this blog yesterday, there would appear to be at least a degree of internal tension sussurating below the surface of the UK coalition with regard to the proposed independence referendum.
Equally, as billed yesterday, I would not seek to over-emphasise this.
So where were we? On the verge of an independence referendum in Scotland? And has that verge narrowed or widened as a result of developments over the weekend and today?
For any sake, where are my manners? A guid New Year to all regular and new readers of this blog. May 2012 bring prosperity, good times and a Dundee United cup victory.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.