Bankers 'must swear oath' after scandals, says report

sterling cash notes An oath would prioritise the needs of bankers' customers

Related Stories

An oath for bankers should be introduced to raise accountability and standards in banking, said the think tank ResPublica.

It said the lack of public trust in banking after numerous scandals was an "ongoing concern" for the industry and the government.

In a new report, ResPublica called for an oath for bankers to "fulfil their proper moral and economic purpose".

Small businesses should also be treated as consumers, said the report.

'Road to absolution'

The think tank said this could ensure banks treated struggling firms fairly.

Director at ResPublica, Philip Blond, said: "As countless scandals demonstrate, virtue is distinctly absent from our banking institutions.

"Britain's bankers lack a sense of ethos and the institutions they work for lack a clearly defined social purpose."

He said an oath would "finally place bankers on the road to absolution".

The think tank said the British Bankers' Association, Building Societies Association and the new Banking Standards Review Council should adopt the oath for their members.

An extract from the oath says: "I will do my utmost to behave in a manner that prioritises the needs of customers.

"It is my first duty to provide an exemplary quality of service to my customers and to exhibit a duty of care above and beyond what is required by law."

'Part of answer'

Another part adds: "I will confront profligacy and impropriety wherever I encounter it, for the conduct of bankers can have dramatic consequence for society."

BBA executive director for financial policy and operations, Paul Chisnall, said: "Restoring trust and confidence is the banking industry's number one priority.

"But meaningful cultural change in an industry as complex and diverse as banking takes time."

He said a banking oath "very well could be part of the answer".

ResPublica also said bank shareholders should have more responsibility to make sure banks are held to account.

The full report, Virtuous Banking: Placing ethos and purpose at the heart of banking, was launched on Tuesday by the chairman of the Banking Standards Review Council, Sir Richard Lambert.

Speaking to the BBC, Mr Lambert said: "Over the last ten or 15 years ... the norms of behaviour in bits of the banking sector have slipped out to a way which is unacceptable".

"I am strongly in favour or robust regulation, but the law can only go so far.

"Banks should decide what is the purpose of banking.

"Why are they in business? Are they there just to maximise profits, are they a utility, are they there to serve the public and not make profits? What are they for?"

'Client wellbeing'

On Monday Lloyds Banking Group was fined £218m for "serious misconduct" over a key interest rate set in London, Libor.

Part of the fine, from the Financial Conduct Authority, was for abusing a scheme set up by the Bank of England to help the financial industry during the crisis.

Richard Jeffrey from Cazenove Capital Management told the BBC that it was "shocking that Lloyds was biting or, at least trying to bite, the hand that was feeding it.

He said: "A lot has changed in the banking industry. I think ethics have changed but a lot needs to be done.

"Banks were far more inwardly focussed on the money they were generating ... One of the key changes we have got to see in ethics within banking is that every decision [banks take have] to be focussed on the wellbeing of your clients".


More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 826.

    The banks are one of our biggest employers - many are normal people with average salaries and families.
    The banks are one of our biggest exporters
    The banks were one of our biggest tax payers.

    Bash them if it makes you feel good. But I think it's time to move on.

  • rate this

    Comment number 527.

    People who break the law justify themselves by saying that everyone else is also doing so. Making a promise to be honest in public is a small step, but might help to re-build a culture of honesty, where dishonest practices can be challenged more easily. It's worth trying.

  • rate this

    Comment number 217.

    Or people could quit whinging and do something about their own lives to improve them rather than always looking for someone to blame

    Just because someone has worked hard and got into a top banker job does not mean they are instantly bad.U have some bad apples, as u do in ALL proffessions

    Huge blame culture in this country now, just get up and better yourself then u wont be so green with envy

  • rate this

    Comment number 207.

    Worked 25 years as a financial advisor. The cowboys were promoted (and are still there right up to the top), the honest were managed out. They would not understand the meaning or seriousness of an oath. I'm not even sure the threat of jail would put them off, they have been lying for so long!

  • rate this

    Comment number 174.

    The government needs to shift focus from making a few rich people richer, to helping improve things for everyone.

    Oaths are pointless, we need to change the systems and laws that allow these people to make so much money, while doing nothing of any value.

    Money should represent actual work done or real resources or goods. Playing with imaginary numbers leads to suffering on a global scale.


Comments 5 of 10


More Business stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.