Why is governor signalling early rate rise?

The Bank of England

When the governor of the Bank of England told the City at the Lord Mayor's Banquet tonight that an interest rate rise could happen "sooner than markets currently expect", he might equally have said, "sooner than I expected".

The point is that markets reflect signals on the timing of a rate rise emitted by Mark Carney and his colleagues on the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee.

And those signals have, till tonight, been pointing towards an interest rate rise in the first half of next year.

But as of Thursday evening, a small rise in the Bank rate of 0.5% (so close to zero as makes little difference) - a likely increment of 0.25% - seems probable some time this year.

Strong momentum

As I've said before, there would be huge political advantages to moving early, perhaps in the autumn, because the Bank would not be vulnerable to accusations that it was in some sense influencing the outcome of next May's general election - which would be an issue if it raised rates either just after or just before the election.

But although this governor has conspicuously sensitive political antennae, his avowed reason for saying that the "start of the journey" to increase the cost of money "is coming nearer" is that the momentum in the British economy shows no sign of slowing.

Growth is strong and employment creation is strong - which means that the spare capacity in the economy, which the Bank estimates at 1% to 1.5% of GDP, may be used up sooner than the Bank had been anticipating.

And that would in turn mean that inflation might start to accelerate, because companies would have to pay more to hire people, and would have to pass on those higher costs in the form of rising prices.

That would necessitate interest rate rises to slow the economy and suppress the inflation.

That said, the Bank had been taking the view that towards the end of the year, growth would slow and productivity would rise.

That would dampen inflationary pressures even without an interest rate increase - when productivity or output per worker improves, companies can pay their people more, without feeling under pressure to increase the selling price of their goods and services.

But as Mark Carney concedes, what we can observe right now is a buoyant economy - and the automatic corrective action, of a slowdown and improved productivity, is hypothetical.

So he says that the Bank may feel obliged to take out insurance against the economy overheating by imposing the dampening influence of a small interest-rate rise.

Change of view

But there is something slightly curious about this change of tune by the governor, in that the economy is performing broadly in line with the Bank's forecasts.

A cynic might, therefore, observe that if Mr Carney is saying that interest rates should rise sooner rather than later, what has probably changed is the balance of opinion on the MPC, rather than the economic fundamentals.

Mr Carney may be positioning himself at the vanguard of a hawkish consensus to raise rates early, having hitherto been more of a dove, perhaps because he doesn't wish to be seen to be a defeated dove.

Even so, in other respects he is sticking to his old tune, by insisting that rate rises will be small and gradual.

And although he says markets may be wrong that the first interest rate increase is some time away, he implies markets are right to believe that the policy rate will rise to only 2.25% over the next three years - because it is on that path for interest rates that the Bank believes the economy will become more balanced and the output gap will almost be closed.

In other words, for those of you with big debts who have been made anxious that the era of free money is drawing to a close, there is some comfort to be had that there should be no return to penally priced money for many years.

Due to technical problems this blog had to be published twice. Some reader comments are on the earlier publication below.

Robert Peston Article written by Robert Peston Robert Peston Economics editor

Living standards not quite back to peak

Living standards for a typical family are back to where they were before the recession, says the IFS, although not for those 30 and under.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Robert


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 109.

    Rate-setting democratic deficit?

    Even with the AIM, with the INFORMED & AGREED aim, of INCOME EQUALITY, we WILL fall 'short' (for such reasons as before alluded to, AND many more), but ONLY with that aim will we ever come 'close enough' to shared security, the vital basis for 
EQUAL FREEDOM of speech, and EQUAL FREEDOM to spend politically, the guarantors of democracy as meaningful & on-going.

  • rate this

    Comment number 108.

    The Bank of england forward guidance used indicators of unemployemt being below 7.1% there would be a change of rate rise, so allegedly its seems that the forward guidance has been manufactured to make a change as we all know that the unemployment is going down due to zero contracts, discriminative actions on long term people on beneifts being removed.

  • rate this

    Comment number 107.

    Like many out there, I haven't had any increase in pay for more than 5 years whilst many of my employment benefits have been removed and inflation adds further insult to injury. There is now no slack in the system and any interest rate rise might be the straw that breaks the camels back for many unless we see an associated increase in pay.

  • rate this

    Comment number 106.

    100.mog499 "The average British punter is up to his ears in debt "

    Not true at all

    The average British punter is a saver (There are several times more savers than borrowers)

    You are promoting a gross misinterpretation of reality.

    A very few (unwise) people have far too much debt and they will suffer badly - but you can't say they haven't been warned.

    Savers have been crucified for a decade.

  • rate this

    Comment number 105.

    plotinus @99
    of economy'

    Holy Grail?

    Rather than search for perfect summary statistic (for pundits to pull to pieces), punters distressed at their primary abuse only more enraged by 'statistical overlooking', why not allow monitoring of 'the economy' its rightfully humble place, guiding our choices in resource allocation towards 'what seems right', in trust, in equal partnership?


Comments 5 of 109



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.